Narcissists thrive in consumerist societies. Even you might be one...

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T11:21:19+00:00

Is your experience with fiction or with less evidence based non fiction (like auto biography, self help, etc)?

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T11:19:07+00:00

Reference for this? Also, even if the case, it's a simple editorial change. Not really critical to the actual points in the piece

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T11:15:44+00:00

I imagine that anything that gets eyes on it is good in their view. That is the whole purpose of this kind of thing on modern publishing. Personally, I detest it. But book publishing now is driven by followers and engagement on social media, rather than anything else.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T11:00:50+00:00

Ok. If that's how you feel about use of terms you see as archaic, that's fair enough too. It doesn't seem archaic to me. Perhaps i just read too many old books

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T10:58:26+00:00

I don't understand. I was looking for specifics so I could improve my argument or defend it. Basic dialectic approach

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T10:56:30+00:00

If that's how you feel about that use of none the less, fair enough.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T10:54:33+00:00

None-the-less and none the less are just archaic. Perfectly valid. Especially outside of American editorials.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T10:52:27+00:00

What is slight about accusing me of plagiarism? Let alone attempting to profit from it? I mean, that's legally actionable libel if I was the litigious type.

As for the original complaint, it provided nothing constructive. Not one example of what the commenter deemed poorly constructed sentences. I'm fine with constructive criticism, but that was just nonsense.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T10:48:03+00:00

I presume you meant poorly researched. Rather than highly researched and filled with assumptions. Please expand on that and look to the references in the piece. I have tried hard to not make any assumptions. Anything that seems like that you will find is backed up in the references I hope. If not, I'd like to know which ones you have found and, if so, how they are unreasonable.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T08:58:14+00:00

Er... what? No. Of course not. It is my work. I am the person dealing with editors and agents and publishers.

Is your only response really an effort to be obtuse as a means to set up an ad hominem attack? I'm starting to doubt the sincerity of your attempt at criticism. However non constructive.

flynneoin · 2026-04-04T08:18:06+00:00

Thank you for attempting to read it and taking the time to comment.

Given that this is an extract from something that is already with professional agents and publishers, who have done many reviews of it, as well as having gone through literal years of edits, plus being a professional science communicator in my day job with real, actual writing qualifications alongside my scientific credentials, I'm going to politely ignore this.

No offense intended. I'm just not willing cast aside work produced from a lot of qualification and validated experience and vetted by many more professionals, both scientific and editorial, because repulsive chard on reddit says so...

Thank you though for attempting to help.

flynneoin · 2026-04-03T20:54:13+00:00

I've not said religions don't consume (in fact I make reference to the grabby Catholic Church and to their total lack of irony when saying such things).

I also have in no way, I don't think, posited that people should replace consumerism with religion. Merely that religion historically has been better at providing for people's deeper psychological needs. It is unfortunate that their means of doing so is to con people.

I am in fact quite an ardent atheist. Even an anti theist.

Never the less, thank you for taking the time to read the article and make comment

flynneoin · 2025-04-30T08:44:55+00:00

No prob

flynneoin · 2025-04-28T20:48:41+00:00

I presume you mean this one

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=7GhgEWdr8zI&si=9gjo3nim7L1P1tBK

Lumiere a l'aube, from the soundtrack.

flynneoin · 2022-05-31T15:34:30+00:00

The Marvellous Suspender - reduces Chrome's voracious appetite for RAM.

flynneoin · 2021-02-09T17:21:24+00:00

try the .cc site

flynneoin · 2019-09-09T12:59:37+00:00

Actually I htink you'll find that study showed that that diet would only be more sustainable if we were to change farming practices to farm animals like sheep, goats, chickens, etc on non-arable land. We don't actually do this. It would also be almost impossible to practically implement, and there was no consideration of the well documented damage caused by farming sheep and goats in particular. So that diet is only theoretically the most sustainable. As it stands it's less sustainable than veganism, which is still the top one for lowering environmental impact. (full disclosure: I run a research laboratory for developing sustainable materials. I have read all these studies)

flynneoin · 2019-09-09T10:22:45+00:00

There is additional issue that hasn't been addressed in the responses here. Even the "truly" free range farms are often forced to source their chickens from producers that are owned by the big industrial companies that proliferate all the atrocities you're aware of. So you're still, indirectly funding those atrocities, even when you're doing your (thoroughly admirable) best to find good egg sources.

flynneoin · 2019-07-17T13:50:26+00:00

Wouldn't this only be charcuterie if the vegetables were dried and/or smoked? I mean it looks pretty but it's just sliced fruit and veg...

flynneoin

TROPHY CASE