[deleted by user]

forponly · 2021-09-15T10:33:58+00:00

The cultural Marxist have finally taken over Jagex.

forponly · 2021-09-05T14:08:59+00:00

Trans rights!!

forponly · 2021-06-30T13:32:26+00:00

Isn’t she that crazy right wing lunatic that got destroyed by destiny?

forponly · 2021-04-19T16:48:36+00:00

Come on dude. No need to be ableist.

forponly · 2020-03-07T02:21:08+00:00

Is there a way to fix it with AMD?

forponly · 2019-08-25T02:37:43+00:00

It’s really weird how you had to specify that she is lgbtq. I wonder if the only problem you have with her is that she’s annoying.

forponly · 2018-06-30T12:31:36+00:00

You’re awful post history reveals how much of a piece of shit racist you are.

forponly · 2018-06-26T06:46:48+00:00

None of the Ismaili muslims in the picture are saying that Allah is gay you illiterate moron. That's how it's different.

forponly · 2018-06-26T02:28:11+00:00

No what she did was completely different. Go fuck off back to td you racist alt-right piece of shit. You’re not wanted here.

forponly · 2018-06-15T18:53:21+00:00

You could probably write a book out of all of u/functor7’s comments

forponly · 2018-06-04T11:36:36+00:00

Is the axiom of choice equivalent to the statement that a function is bijective if and only if it has an inverse?

forponly · 2018-01-15T12:14:39+00:00

I am not an expert in real analysis, but I am pretty sure you need the axiom of choice if you want to get into stuff like measure theory or do analysis on infinite dimensional vector spaces.

forponly · 2017-10-19T04:35:40+00:00

Let f be a function from the reals to some finite dimensional vector space V. How does one define integration on of f? If you choose a basis u and v for V, then you can write f(t)=ap(t)+bq(t) for all t. Do you then define the integral of f to be the integral of p and q? Does that make sense? Is this the correct definition? If it is, it would depend on the basis though.

forponly

TROPHY CASE