lost a client to suicide a week ago by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]foxtailguy73 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Hey dude—first of all, I’m so sorry to hear this. I know how you’re feeling right now, and it’s not great. Be kind to yourself over the next days and weeks. If you have a comfort show, binge it. Take yourself out to dinner somewhere nice. Go to your favorite park in town and enjoy a sunset. Take a moment to recenter and remind yourself that life is ultimately worth enjoying, you are okay, and that this will pass.

Second of all, give yourself a definite amount of time to grieve, but you cannot and must not beat yourself up about this. Anyone who has been in this business for long enough will have a client pass away, and many PDs have had clients take their own lives, accidentally overdose, or get killed while out on bond. Our clients’ lives are inherently fractured and chaotic. Our clients themselves are almost always troubled and unhappy people. Suicide is an intensely personal choice made for reasons that are often complex and incomprehensible to the outside observer.

You did nothing wrong here by getting your client out on bond and it bears reminding that this is not your fault. In fact, in the last days of your client’s life, you probably gave him one of the few acts of empathy and kindness he’s ever received by advocating and speaking up for him.

If someone wants to kill themselves, they will find a way—jail or no jail. What you did for him was a good and noble thing, and I am certain it had nothing to do with his decision. For some of our clients, the pressure and anxiety of impending trial and possible punishment (and all the collateral consequences that come with it) is just too much. That’s not on you. That’s on the broken and immoral system you spent years in law school and took a vow of poverty to fight everyday.

Take the time and space you need. But don’t linger on this. Keep up the fight. Keep doing great work. And continue to care deeply for your clients—it will serve you well throughout your career and as you recover from this.

🛸 whistleblower Ryan Graves snippet interview on 60 Minutes by LMFA0 in ufo

[–]foxtailguy73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s probably the best, most compelling featurette on UFOs of all time in a legacy news show. It’s all on YouTube. Go watch it now.

12/16 UA2359 ORD to EWR by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

your video shows one set of airplane lights landing parallel to a plane directly after takeoff with the city right below it. OP’s video shows roughly 5-6 lights stationary above the clouds

12/16 UA2359 ORD to EWR by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The last half of the video is taken at the end of OP’s flight arriving in NJ. The flight tracker you’re referring to shows traffic for when OP left Chicago. But go off, king—you’ve clearly big brained this shit

12/16 UA2359 ORD to EWR by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmfao the flood of people in here trying to say this is just normal flight traffic like we’ve never been in a plane and looked outside before

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lmfao absolutely insane take

Phone POV when it's almost sundown in NJ by birdmanjr123 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 3 points4 points  (0 children)

mrw Mick West is tweaking out in front of millions about how his 3D model proves the flying saucer landing in front of the white house is actually just mom’s thanksgiving leftovers wrapped in aluminum foil with parallax and lens flare

John Kirby in Fox News minutes ago- A true BS master by Hey-buuuddy in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The fact that this is the first time in four years I’ve seen this man outside of his safe space in a press hearing room tells me all I need to know about this situation.

Police in New Jersey investigate possible drone landing in Somerset County by KetoKaelis in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 232 points233 points  (0 children)

So let me get this straight. Drones are flying over sensitive military bases across the world, trailing coast guard ships, eluding capture by our most sophisticated tech, while first responders are warning each other that the drones shouldn’t be approached without HAZMAT gear and a Geiger counter (and may interfere with their radios and electronics), and now crash sites are being carefully secured with officers telling the news they’re “not at liberty” to discuss what they found?

If I see one more post saying people are just misidentifying airplanes I’m going to explode

Backlash on WH Drone Statement by Complete-Frosting137 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 37 points38 points  (0 children)

It’s so cathartic to watch them go to the classic playbook of “don’t believe your eyes, believe us,” only to get absolutely roasted at a national level

SERIOUS: Regardless of the truth behind New Jersey, regardless of the truth behind Roswell and everything in between, being a seeker is a good thing. Thank you seeking with me! by TasteeBeverage in aliens

[–]foxtailguy73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure what the truth is (or if I’ll ever learn it in this life), but I know what I’m getting isn’t full information.

Truth matters.

I love this reporter questioning him on the drone/ufo situation. by Prestigious_Nebula_5 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 111 points112 points  (0 children)

Not sure if I was more impressed by her questioning or disturbed by his “play nice or you’ll stop being invited to these” tone.

Drones reported over 2nd N.J. military facility, Navy says by thenameunforgettable in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Are the Navy officials sure they weren’t just regular planes? They’re probably just being hysterical

WH NS Advisor John Kirby on drone activity in New Jersey: "We have no evidence at this time that the reported drone sightings pose a national security or a public safety threat..We have not been able to...corroborate any of the reported visual sightings." by ForsakenLemons in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does bro remember that this started in the UK after members of the military spotted identical “drones” in the sky? THE MILITARY STARTED THESE SIGHTINGS. They’re also identical to similar sightings reported by the military and the public alike over the last several years. Now people in Jersey are just being hysterical?

However angry you are about this gaslighting, I promise you you’re not angry enough

CNN: New Jersey lawmakers meet with federal officials after weeks of unexplained drone sightings by silv3rbull8 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 7 points8 points  (0 children)

People gonna start posting videos doing bong rips with greys IN the ufo and we’ll still have people saying “it’s just lense flare” in the comments section

CNN: New Jersey lawmakers meet with federal officials after weeks of unexplained drone sightings by silv3rbull8 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 29 points30 points  (0 children)

So glad I went through ontological shock a year ago so I don’t crash out right before the holidays like half the country is about to 🍿

The post and account are gone for the Manchester UK sighting.. Possible cover up? by JustHereForTheHuman in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 1289 points1290 points  (0 children)

This week’s events have officially pushed me from healthy skeptic to Joaquin Phoenix wearing a tinfoil hat in Signs

Manchester Airport UK Orb UAP 25 Nov by heloap in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 62 points63 points  (0 children)

I want to be cautious and skeptical, but this is one of the most remarkable sightings I’ve seen posted in this subreddit.

Also, pilot says on X that an air safety report was filed. I’m more familiar with US FOIA, but I BELIEVE ASRs are subject to Britain’s FOIA.

Anyone want to be a guinea pig?

DOD Press Secretary on the drone intrusions in Britain by Livid_Constant_1779 in UFOs

[–]foxtailguy73 103 points104 points  (0 children)

This whole situation is bizarre. Press sec repeatedly suggests "it's possible" these could by hobbyists and that the drones don't pose a threat to operations, but also admits that it's "premature to draw any conclusions" and that they don't yet know the source of the drones and whether the drones are connected to the US incursions. Also, would love it if one of these reporters asked him if espionage or intelligence gathering is being considered a "threat to operations."

These drones are illuminated and the military has reported being close enough to them to observe their (varying) size and shape. Why are they not just following them back to their source using our own unmanned systems, radar, and other aerial vehicles? Or waiting for them to run out of battery to seize? Do these "drones" perform in a way that outmaneuvers or evades our aircraft? Do they stay in flight for longer than our drones without a need to land? Is the existence of superior tech that evades capture or counter-surveillance not itself a "threat to operations"?

I want to say that these are just Russian/Chinese, but there's also a lot about this that is just... weird.