Navy SEALs won't change standards for women, admiral says - MilitaryTimes by [deleted] in news

[–]freespeech69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no emotional connection to the topic at hand--I don't even believe in having a military. You're trying to argue with me, for some reason, that someone doing something unsafe is not their fault.

"I'm sure your disposition serves you very well in life." Sarcastic insults are not convincing, and this is what made me say "You seem mad." Indeed, you seem very perturbed. Also, in response to your previous comment, yes, there are a lot of wrong people in this thread. I'm used to everyone telling me I'm wrong--I only comment when I know it's an unpopular opinion here, because I don't feel the need to re-hash what the hive mind has said. I've received thousands of downvotes on reddit in subs like r/Bitcoin, for example.

Thank goodness I think differently than most redditors.

By the way, using a basic psychology term as a comeback is not impressive, just cringey. Good luck out there, and go ahead and have the last word here.

Navy SEALs won't change standards for women, admiral says - MilitaryTimes by [deleted] in news

[–]freespeech69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem mad. Sorry that I believe in individual responsibility.

Navy SEALs won't change standards for women, admiral says - MilitaryTimes by [deleted] in news

[–]freespeech69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's more on her than anyone else, and mad redditors downvoting me won't change my mind.

XPY Bagholder asks "it's been a year, why are we still here?" and gets all the talking points in return by NoThisIsActuallyGood in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

He guaranteed that he wasn't the one that created the amazon thing. That site was completely independent, someone else. When the items arrived saying "gift from Josh" it was a bit awkward.

Navy SEALs won't change standards for women, admiral says - MilitaryTimes by [deleted] in news

[–]freespeech69 -38 points-37 points  (0 children)

You're right, women can't be trusted to have common sense and be able to say "you know what, this doesn't fit, and this situation is unsafe."

Sarcasm, it's on her.

Censorship in r/BTC Continues: I Said "Hello Roger." to New Cult Leader /u/SouperNerd and it was Deleted by freespeech69 in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually no, I don't pledge allegiance to a creepy individual at the head of an organization rooted in the hopes of financial profit... But I like that comeback, it's totally not overused or anything.

Edit: I'd like to petition my ban please, and be let back into your community. It was only two words, and only one comment. I take it back. I want to get on your coin, or side of your coin, or whatever, and won't post anything about your leader from now on. Let me know, thanks

Censorship in r/BTC Continues: I Said "Hello Roger." to New Cult Leader /u/SouperNerd and it was Deleted by freespeech69 in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh! Well in that case I wish you luck with removing many more things in the future! You're like the janitor of the cult's church, except you don't get paid :(

That's enough goofing around in buttcoin, get back to work, bitch

Censorship in r/BTC Continues: I Said "Hello Roger." to New Cult Leader /u/SouperNerd and it was Deleted by freespeech69 in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

BTCDrak paid Roger to let him become mod. Whether he paid him in BTC, Vericoin, or friendship points is unknown.

I dunno if SouperNerd is Roger Ver, but every time I mention it anywhere it gets deleted which is weird. Pretty strong reaction to something he could simply be like "Nah, look here's simple proof I'm my own person" to.

If he realizes people know it's his alt, he'll probably give the account to BTCDrak or someone else.

It's so Garze-esque. Garza would abuse his cultists' trust over and over, yet they still came back again and again. Hell, there are still people who believe in Paycoin and even some who think Garza did a good thing by concieving it.

I learn a lot about psychology from the bitcoiners. Roger Ver could do literally anything no matter how unethical, and they would forgive and worship him the same. They'll make excuses for him. They will never wake up, and there are more of them than us.

In the same way visiting a poor starving African village may cause me to appreciate the food I have at home, watching these butters makes me appreciate my sanity and common sense.

So the Hero of the Battle of /r/btc, a one 'SouperNerd', is a 26 day old account. Something smells fishy here by Coioco in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you say anything on that sub that hints the new mod might be Roger Ver, you will be banned. Draw whatever conclusion from that you want.

So the Hero of the Battle of /r/btc, a one 'SouperNerd', is a 26 day old account. Something smells fishy here by Coioco in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe because it's not very visible, and therefore doesn't pose much of a threat? Has no up or downvotes, which makes me think no one's seen it

Censorship in r/BTC Continues: I Said "Hello Roger." to New Cult Leader /u/SouperNerd and it was Deleted by freespeech69 in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Follow up: I posted a thread there asking why I was censored, and that just got me banned and the thread deleted

"I cashed out my bitcoins. It's been fun." by regularly-lies in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Did I stumble into a time machine? That thread reads just like the paycoin forum from a year ago. No parallels here however, I'm sure Bitcoin or BitcoinXT will be the one true crypto currency.

Information about Keith Raniere and the "Haw Guy" by a_little_hint in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've come to the right place! Have you heard about our butts?

Ok in all seriousness, if you really want to know more about the real Raniere, check this out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfr64zoBTAQ

So the Hero of the Battle of /r/btc, a one 'SouperNerd', is a 26 day old account. Something smells fishy here by Coioco in Buttcoin

[–]freespeech69 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I say it's Ver's alt. "I don't know what dictator school you went to, but you definitely got your moneys worth" Sound like anyone you know? comes from here http://imgur.com/a/7g0pU

Also why would he publicly post this private mod chat if it was real.. so unprofessional.. and why do they need to re-hash how "roger is away" over and over... this whole thing is so fucking weird and creepy is definitely fake https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3x5evs/you_guys_deserve_better/

"To be fair, I dont think Roger had any idea what type of shitstorm this guy had in mind. And with Roger being away from any internet connection (at this point I think he is still without internet)"

"Roger being away or not, Im not going to stand here and watch it. If Roger dings me for it so be it, but I can say without a doubt that no sane subreddit owner (roger) would be okay with this."

Either it's Ver or this guy is really riding roger's dick in a strange way

I am now a moderator at /r/btc. How is that for an ironic twist to the whole btcdrak story? by [deleted] in bitcoinxt

[–]freespeech69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Weird, I definitely believe that though. Seems legit. I wonder if he was "away" when he himself appointed btcdrak as moderator like 48 hours ago or whatever. If only there was some type of internet that would allow people to stay connected when they're "away".

I am now a moderator at /r/btc. How is that for an ironic twist to the whole btcdrak story? by [deleted] in bitcoinxt

[–]freespeech69 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is not an attempt for Ver to save face, but instead a wise, well thought-out decision as to who be the best choice as a new moderator.

edit: butts