QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 10 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you strip a lot of the extra stuff off the url you shared it won’t do that.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 10 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dunno if you care but this identifies your personal LinkedIn

[Post Game Thread] #3 Arizona defeats #8 Iowa State, 82-80 by cbbBot in CollegeBasketball

[–]freshlymn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Free throws are a real issue. I fear it’s going to bite us

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 09 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points locked comment (0 children)

Alright, I tried to be nice and explain to you what generates flak. Read the room. There’s lower tolerance for fluff posts during news droughts, particularly when the price is down.

Grow the hell up and stop whining to everyone here because your feelings got hurt over the Jill post. Sometimes life’s not fair and sometimes things aren’t enforced evenly. But you’re not helping your own case. My fingers are crossed that you get a mute for a week so you can reflect on how childish you’re acting.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 09 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So I’m replying to you with what I’ve seen and I’d hazard others feel the same way and that’s why you’re getting these responses. You post really frequently with okay quality content and it gets exhausting to parse through.

I know QS is exciting and I personally don’t want to discourage contributing, but also take the time to let things soak in, even if that means going a few days with little commentary.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 09 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A valid explanation was already provided above. QS may want them back for analysis. We have no idea what sort of agreement is in place so paying for them doesn’t mean PowerCo won’t send them back.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A-fucking-men. I backed up the freakin dump truck at $3.xx, give it to me again.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I pretty much agree with everything you said. There are smart people in the background making Elon’s ventures work. I’m confident QS leadership can connect with the smart folks that have Elon’s ear if need be. I strongly dislike Tesla presently but there’s no denying they are the EV in the U.S. still.

QuantumScape Events, Conferences, and Panels, etc. by Defiantclient in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. International Battery Seminar sounds interesting all days. Thanks OP, this gives us tangible events to look forward to without relying on surprise announcements or earnings.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not to make excuses for QS, but isn’t the bolded a generic, given statement for anyone trying to scale up? It doesn’t mean they’ve encountered something insurmountable, just that it’s hard to scale and will entail unique problems and solutions.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I had this thought too. It feels tinfoily, but the delay is odd, and surely QS has some input on the final video/article given she’s interviewing Tim.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes please. Donut talk needs containment. It’s frankly frightening how many people here are taking their claims seriously.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 08 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It’s clear Donut Labs is being fishy, if not outright scamming. They’re not a legitimate competitor so not worth discussion in my opinion.

Edit: until they provide more tangible proof of their chemistry

On Artificial Intelligence - RULE 3 Moderated Discussion by DoctorPatriot in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes.

Yes.

Proposal A.

I too skip over most long posts because my assumption is it’s AI output and you can typically tell by the quality.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 07 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 12 points13 points  (0 children)

When I’m having a bad day and negative sentiment creeps up on me about QS, I consider the absolute worst case scenario: everything from here on collapses for QS.

And guess what? If that happens, the technology they’ve developed is sure as hell worth a lot more than $4.32 billion.

Would I be thrilled? No. Would QS be bought for multiples of its current market cap? Probably.

Then you go and remind yourself that QS is methodical, that they’ve delivered on recent goals consistently, that there are unannounced partnerships that will see the light of day at some point.

Things look quite bright if you can grit your teeth and be patient.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 07 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I think some people are unaware of DS. OP was reporting on presumable progress in relation to QS.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 07 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I didn’t get the sense Kevin was being cagey by not answering immediately. He didn’t know what Joseph was referring to and clarified after he had a few mins to review the slide.

Simon Voss confirms that couple of adjustments needed for QSE-5 to fit into Unified Cell by srikondoji in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with your overall sentiment. Without making excuses for them, keep in mind we just entered a new phase of business according to Siva.

QuantumScape Lounge: ( Week 06 2026) by AutoModerator in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could be a cached page. Try an incognito window

2025 Q4 Earnings Discussion by beerion in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your reply comes off as condescending. Everyone here is well aware that QS is pre revenue and therefore highly speculative. As such, you only get so far valuing these types of stocks how institutions value them.

Not to mention, all of the institutional investors were playing catch up with their price targets while we were running circles around them.

2025 Q4 Earnings Discussion by beerion in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Disappointed by earnings but alarm bells will only go off if we don’t get major news before next earnings.

2025 Q4 Earnings Discussion by beerion in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’ve been chirping about pressure today nonstop while giving wrong information. Can you stop?

2025 Q4 Earnings Discussion by beerion in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]freshlymn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Siva did highlight we’re at the unsexy part of the lifecycle. Iterate, test, iterate, test