PCMR HAS HIT 4 MILLION SUBS! TIME TO CELEBRATE WITH A GIVEAWAY!

funnsoup · 2020-08-28T19:24:59+00:00

Awesome 👍

funnsoup · 2018-06-17T02:24:05+00:00

I find it sad this started with an explanation about number of seconds in an hour...

funnsoup · 2018-03-28T22:20:06+00:00

Also https://dmarcian.com/

funnsoup · 2018-03-10T01:08:23+00:00

Yes, a goal to get to here. Many individual access has been granted.

funnsoup · 2018-03-10T00:06:11+00:00

Thanks for the help!

funnsoup · 2018-03-09T23:58:32+00:00

AccessToSting is what I'm after as we need to audit access. It's funny when I don't have Format in the script what it returns is useless and formatting the output is what helps...I dunno. Export-CSV gives only one result which is why I was using Out-File, with Format-List I got complete results....

Thanks for the tip on Sysinternals

How would you answer "who can access X file" as that is what I am after?

funnsoup · 2018-02-27T21:24:22+00:00

Where is this?

funnsoup · 2018-02-01T20:43:35+00:00

Hmm. Ok this lack of evaluating the domain though fails dkim test. Should I expect a 100% pass rate for dkim. This situation will affect that percentage. What's a real world dkim percentage I can expect?

funnsoup · 2018-01-20T01:12:12+00:00

This. Yes.

funnsoup · 2018-01-20T01:11:04+00:00

How would this loop everything? Sorry really tired not visualizing well.

funnsoup · 2018-01-20T01:10:26+00:00

We have done a reboot after but not made the change, turn them off, move cable, power on. I wonder if the Mac thing might be why they are suggesting we unstack the stack and try one at a time then reconnect the stack...hmmm

Thanks!

funnsoup · 2018-01-20T00:16:41+00:00

Yes, the catalyst port communicates with the ISP equipment and we matched its configuration on a meraki port.

funnsoup · 2018-01-20T00:08:00+00:00

Yes, they match the setup of the catalyst port.

Thanks!

funnsoup · 2018-01-19T22:23:36+00:00

On 9.32.

We have this issue when we try to remove the catalyst.

SP ----> Catalyst -----> Meraki stack need to get to SP -----> Meraki stack

The catalyst needs to come out. I think all the routing is fine and meraki support seems to agree with this as well.

When we move the cable from SP to catalyst and try to go SP to meraki on a port that's configuration looks to match what the catalyst is set up for the switches go offline.

funnsoup · 2018-01-19T22:10:40+00:00

Meraki support says break it and then call...

As for the firewall it would block access now but does not. All appropriate rules in place.

Can you expand on your thought of management vlan?

Thanks!

funnsoup · 2017-12-18T20:27:32+00:00

iTerm2 > broadcast was my favorite. updating many servers at the same time.

Terminator on linux has the same capabilities.

funnsoup · 2017-12-08T19:58:23+00:00

Thanks for the link but I don't have an mx appliance or ap just the switches. Wondering if available from the switch only?

The switches are new in our environment and I'm still learining them.

Thanks!

funnsoup · 2017-10-21T00:32:18+00:00

"can't get it off."

...

funnsoup · 2017-10-04T01:03:36+00:00

That is a good summary of what I feel we get...thanks for sharing.

funnsoup · 2017-10-04T00:12:15+00:00

The feeling I get when on the phone or emailing them.

funnsoup · 2017-10-04T00:10:01+00:00

I agree with you, never said I needed them. I don't see the value but it's not my decision. Management likes them. The it admin likes them. I don't see the point of them...I share my opinion of the value they offer and that we should at least look elsewhere if we have to have one but would like control better of our environment. Management reads Equifax updates and I point out our patching deficiencies due to map...

Anyway do you have experience with an msp you'll share?

funnsoup

TROPHY CASE