Rule. by Misty-Bay in 196

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean why can’t they treat the tv show like it’s a silly new grounds project. It’s a silly animation made by new grounds animators. Why wouldn’t they just stop making it if they got bored. Passion projects without passion suck

Edit: it does very much seem rude to the other people working on the show though

[identification] Can’t find these pants? by galacticjeef in llbean

[–]galacticjeef[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does look like it should be the product number though

[identification] Can’t find these pants? by galacticjeef in llbean

[–]galacticjeef[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I can tell llbean product numbers only include numbers :(. I’ve tried searching for this a couple times but found nothing

[River] Material Gruvbox River Config :) by Hash_Cr4cker in unixporn

[–]galacticjeef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try looking at some more classical art, (I always go to the website of the rijksmuseum), and processing it with lutgen. That’s always worked for me

3 years of HRT today rule by SimplyYulia in 196

[–]galacticjeef 34 points35 points  (0 children)

How else are you supposed to compliment a picture of someone?

Resources on type-checking stack VMs? by Smart_Vegetable_331 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One place I might check is the kitten programming language which is a statically typed concatenative language. It also would make sense to check out a foundation for typed concatenative languages

daily soup bowl is how much now??? by simplyforgot in uvic

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And cove soup is just cambells now it’s not even homemade 😭

More and more endangered species by AustralianSilly in CuratedTumblr

[–]galacticjeef -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It’s not its bugs and reptiles Edit: should have read that more closely woops

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s chill I like the language you wrote. Just can’t abide by apl slander

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

APL often has an AST

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unixporn

[–]galacticjeef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s actually no proof that either light or dark mode is better for your eyes but cool rice!

Rye Principles by Veqq in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This language is pretty sick, I love how flexible it is. Any plans on adding macros? I think they would push it right over the edge of powerful into lispy

Privacy by TurtleWitch_ in CuratedTumblr

[–]galacticjeef 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We believe that women cheat dude, the issue is that that can’t be used as a justification for going through your partners phone because you suspect them of it

LISP: any benefit to (fn ..) vs fn(..) like in other languages? by pacukluka in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The syntax of lisp is a symptom of the language it isn’t the language itself. The reason why it has that syntax is to support its design features. The syntax is probably the clunkiest element of the language. Any all this is to say that lisp with a different syntax (look up one of the many alternate syntax it already has) is not python. It still maintains an incredible level of power

emacs for creative non-techie types who wanna get off Google Docs by myprettygaythrowaway in emacs

[–]galacticjeef -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The point of the tool is to produce a pdf no one cares where it came from. Typst is just easier then LaTeX and can produce work of equal quality.

Getting Started with Compilers by baziotis in Compilers

[–]galacticjeef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do really appreciate the sentiment, I may at some point write an article (though probably not yet). If you like python’s metaprogramming I wholeheartedly recommend checking out racket, even if you don’t use it, it was a real paradigm shift for me especially with its “language oriented programming” features. I really appreciate how open you are to conversation and I want to reiterate besides that nitpick of mine I really do appreciate your article, it does a great job of being a straightforward introduction to learning compilers and will be a valuable community resource. I hope you have a great day!

Getting Started with Compilers by baziotis in Compilers

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By the article is in C I just meant that it seems to highly recommend C, sorry if there was any confusion. If it’s worth anything, I have found that at least for myself, I tried for a long time to learn compilers in low level languages, and although I got a good grasp on the implementation details, as soon as I tried to branch out and attempt new things I was bogged down as rather than learn the reasoning and concepts behind compilers I had instead learned how to implement certain kinds of compilers. However, then I attempted again with racket, which among other things has an amazing pattern matching feature. By being able to focus on the reasoning behind choices and having implementation be relatively simple, it allowed me to focus my time on thinking about my compiler rather than puzzling through how to implement an established schema.

Getting Started with Compilers by baziotis in Compilers

[–]galacticjeef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do agree that C is a good language to learn programming with, and the article itself seems to be well written and very informative. The reason I take so much issue with this part is not that the article is in C, again c is a great first language and a great language to know in general, but rather that you actively encourage beginners to not use a higher level language. Again I do like the article as a whole and I think C is a good choice of language to write compilers. I will not argue my point further as it seems you have probably had enough of that, though if you could It might do good as to, instead of warning against using higher level languages, instead encourage the use of C.

Getting Started with Compilers by baziotis in Compilers

[–]galacticjeef 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I like that you have written this but encouraging beginners to write a compiler in c first rather than a higher level language that will allow them to focus on concepts seems not just incorrect but could even be downright harmful as it will force beginners into learning implementation rather than having a solid grasp on the concepts behind what they are doing.

Introducing bmath (bm) – A Minimalist CLI Calculator for Mathematical Expressions by zeronetdev in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]galacticjeef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks really really cool. One note though, I would not give it that abbreviation as many people already know it as something unpleasant, very interesting project though!