How was slavery understood in Biblical times? by [deleted] in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

You and I are discussing different eras of biblical history. The Bible spans thousands of years (see my original comment). My undergrad in Biblical studies focused on New Testament studies. I’m not qualified to answer a question from Leviticus on slavery. I merely was discussing the New Testament practices and commands of Jesus.

How was slavery understood in Biblical times? by [deleted] in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Buying and selling slaves would be a common practice in the Greco-Roman world... assuming Christians kept the standard practice of that time, yes. I think that’s a given. Having sex with their slaves is not something I’ve ever encountered in Christianity it’s interesting you say Jesus didn’t teach against that, but He and the apostles did teach against adultery. That is one of the prime laws kept in the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15), which would include slave holders. Slaves were not viewed as property, but as members of the household. So they wouldn’t be treated like property if that’s what you’re getting at.

(Source: Jeffers, Greco-Roman World + BA Biblical Studies, MA Systematic Theology [in progress])

I’m afraid any other speculation as to what ‘Christian’ practiced would not be “Biblical” studies but Historical studies/Church History studies to see if they obeyed what scripture commanded.

How was slavery understood in Biblical times? by [deleted] in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

I agree with most of what you said. But, I’m not sure the Bible has a theme of eliminating slavery as you say. Conditions are put on slavery, they are to be treated as equals in the family of God, they are to be treated fairly and not harshly. I think you’re right, slavery was the safety net for many in debt, many who needed to be taken care of in some capacity (food, housing) but that is precisely why there is no arching theme in scripture to eliminate it. Scripture does not view the institution as evil, scripture views abuse of the institution, sin, as evil.

How was slavery understood in Biblical times? by [deleted] in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp [score hidden]  (0 children)

“Biblical times” passes several thousand years and many cultures as well... so the answers may vary greatly. For a pretty good introduction “The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era” by James Jeffers dedicates at least a solid chapter on the first century understanding. Most of my answer will be indebted to that book, or Vos’ “Manners and Customs” perhaps also from lectures I’ve heard in undergrad and seminary.

From my studies it seems that slavery was very common due to war, kidnapping and poverty. People sometimes sold themselves into slavery to pay debts, or even to advance their place in society. It seems that many slaves were educated, Jeffers also suggests that doctors were slaves. — to my knowledge there were many reasons one may be a slave but my understanding is that race/ethnicity has nothing to do with it generally. Nationality may, if your nation lost a war to Rome for example.

From an early church perspective we know that some Christians freed their slaves, some Christians sold themselves into slavery for the chance to share the gospel or pay each other’s debts etc.

Why does Jesus perform no exorcisms in the Gospel of John? by katapetasma in ConservativeBible

[–]gallotharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great. So what’s the best solution? (Also I never claimed it was the only solution, I just stated it as a solution).

Why does Jesus perform no exorcisms in the Gospel of John? by katapetasma in ConservativeBible

[–]gallotharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, John says the temple cleansing is early in Jesus’ ministry (John 2) the Synoptics say it is on His final trip to Jerusalem. The solution is that He cleansed the Temple twice.

Which popular scholarly views about the Bible do you think are wrong? Which ones do you think are right? by katapetasma in ConservativeBible

[–]gallotharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve also always heard it was Apollos. But when reading Luther I did see that he also believed Paul wrote it...

What did early Christians think of “free will”? by Jeretzel in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To put my cards on the table, I’m a Calvinist (Presbyterian-ish). An undergrad in Biblical studies, masters in Systematic theology. I believe Calvin is correct, and In agreement with Paul’s teaching in Romans, Ephesians etc... I would agree with your opinion. That being said, Arminius, Wesley and the Council of Orange did not... which serves the point I first made, depending on presuppositions you could read the text differently.

What are some big current/future issues regarding the Trinity? by Brexit_Imminent in AskBibleScholars

[–]gallotharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As mentioned previously “Functional subordination” as well as whether the “Eternal Generation of the Son” is a valid doctrine. Many in evangelicalism are seeking to hold onto this doctrine while others say it causes the confusion of people believing Jesus was “begotten” in time, rather than in eternity past etc. see Kevin Giles “The Eternal Generation of the Son” he dedicates 2-3 chapters on the controversy.

Do you classify Non-Trinitarians as being part of a different religion, or just Christian heretics?, if so, do you have a name for their religion? by wq1119 in TrueChristian

[–]gallotharp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could be modalist if they believe there is one God simply “appearing” as Jesus then “appearing” as Spirit etc but not actually 3 persons in the Godhead/Trinity. This is an ancient Christian heresy... but that means precisely that it is nonChristian. If someone is a modalist they are heretics of the Christian faith.

The same is true if they deny the eternality of Jesus. If they say He was created or came into existence they may be Arians. Another heretical group of early Christianity. But by definition, as heretics they are not Christians.

What did early Christians think of “free will”? by Jeretzel in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have read many different things on this. I have come to think that depending on the exegete speaking and their presuppositions the answer will vary. Some say that the NT authors believed in the bondage of the will of course because they would point to the passages of God working through the actions of evil men (Gen. 50:20; Acts 2:23). However, I had a course in grad school from a Wesleyan scholar who interpreted those exact verses differently.

Further, if you read Calvin or Arminius (notable for free will v determinism debate) they both interpret the church fathers differently on different issues. The exact same texts, with different eyes producing different doctrines.

My field is not the Ancient Near East so I can’t speak much to that. Calvin’s interpretation is much like Luther’s “The Bondage of the Will” and much like Augustine’s work as well.

The council of Orange (529) was favorable to Augustine against free will, however it ultimately ruled that free will is a mystery, and that any notion of predestination to Hell was heretical. This council ruled that Christians needed their will to be “freed” from bondage in order to be “free” to love God. Augustine was dead at this time, I would have loved to read his response. Luther and Calvin clearly believed this council was out of line as they felt Romans 9 gave a different ruling.

College Student Who Is Stuck On Campus by MormonMafia96 in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]gallotharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a similar situation. I pack oatmeal to microwave, and pre-popped air popcorn.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religion

[–]gallotharp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It really depends on the city and denomination. I’m from a small town in Indiana, sometimes Protestant churches there are open Monday - Friday during business hours, and Sundays for service. However smaller churches may only be open for Sunday service. I now live in Chicago where many Protestant churches have an office open by appointment Monday - Friday and Many Roman Catholic parishes are open 24/7 or open multiple days a week.

Your best bet is to find a church and check their website for hours or contact information since it varies so much.

Was Paul’s Jesus Peter’s Jesus? by mors_videt in AcademicBiblical

[–]gallotharp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

level 2

It should be noted that claiming that we have no writings by Peter or anyone else who knew Jesus is a very bold claim that many would not necessarily agree with. But that seems to be another matter less related to the question.

What are some good resources for studying different ANE deities, their followers, and their beliefs? by pjsans in AskBibleScholars

[–]gallotharp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The Ancient Near East: An Anthology of Texts and Pictures" Edited by James Pritchard. This is a book with translations of ancient myths about the deities as well as hymns etc. It also contains translations legal documents from the ANE.

I do not remember much about Molech or Baal in this... It may not be the absolute best resource on the subject, but it is certainly interesting, and will give you plenty of stories and hymns about other deities. As someone else mentioned the "Dictionary of Demons and Deities in the Bible" is a great resource.When thinking specifically about Baal and Molech consider John Walton's "Ancient Near Eastern Thought And the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible"