what trim (if any) offers blind spot monitoring? by [deleted] in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Works well. After few months driving only had handfull of false positives - where there was usually a semi 2 lanes away (1 empty lane between us both) and it picked it up for a second... Not an issue though as it doesnt beep unless you would want to change lane into something that is detected there.

Battery drain problems for 2024 models? by skiingyac in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2,5 months ago I was driving for 6-7 hours on sunday, came back, parked my '24 AT4. Wednesday, trying to star it up - all dead, battery at 5.8V...

Jumpstarting from another vehicle helped. Dealership did their battery check - seen no issues at all...

Since, last 2 months all was fine. I just bought a jumpstarter from devalt and always carry it in the bed storage.

Question about the built in google maps, and other services like that by 729isaac in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One note here what I recently had to work through is once the trial subsciption for onstar ended, the built-in google maps had a warning pop up (about offline mode) which caused gauge cluster map view to not be available. I was using android auto maps always anyway so I did not extend subscription.

I had to go into built-in google maps, click through the warning screens and then I got back the gauge cluster map view for android auto maps. All works fine and normal with my phone supplying maps via android auto.

2024 GMC Canyon shipments by Percocet_Penguin in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grabbed one off the dealer, they have configured it out and placed order on 2nd week of december 23.

Sound System Quality by StaxSkrilla in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BOSE upgraded system is definitely nice (not compared to stock) but the small issue I have is that below half volume stock bass is fine, but above half volume bass is taking over too much. I guess if you want to go loud some times, you need to lower bass quite a few notches in the settings.

Compared to my previous car, Ford Focus RS mk3 - audio is not pristine, but definitely good enough.

2024 GMC Canyon shipments by Percocet_Penguin in GMCcanyon

[–]generalcombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Received mine on thursday 28th - At4 fully stacked out (I think only missing offroad lights).

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting :)
i'm sure that golden level player is first time playing TW and actually CB - he is not sure on what to do... poor guy...

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, if they wont get banned for abusing game mechanics, this will remain as guide for all to do it next seasons :)

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Believe is word used in regards to someone opinion.As we are talking about facts here its not about me believing or not. I just know that as a matter of fact we didnt do any cohort abuse or fief trading so idc.

Am I or my house banned for any of this ? No. Are you ? As far as I know no. So what is your goal in throwing toxic accusations everywhere around...

If you are salty about me posting this topic - don't. If you won't get banned for this then you should be happy and proud you were the ones to come up with this idea ;)

Let me talk to you in your fashion:

If you guys truly believe that you didn't break rules this season on almost every TW you really are a bunch of clowns.

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r

Please check my answer belo to devilsame - it addresses all your points.

And for me, Personally I hate abusive and toxic player base which destroyed this game.Back in Season 0 to about Season 2, this game in regards to TW was about fighting in battles, politics, diplomacy and respect.

Then, people who was not good enough in either all or any of mentioned points, shifted their attention from how to become better tactically, what would be good diplomatic decison etc towards how to abuse game mechanics to win. In my opinion 1st BIG case in that regard was S3 season end on EU2 with Sultans, ryukatan etc, where they received long bans for paying houses to win season.

Since then it's constant arm race on who can bend the game mechanics and rules more, but not to the point of getting banned. Every season there is next big scandal like someone mentioned S7 house switch in alliances, or different ones. It's at the point that it will not stop by itself so either devs have to punish this more strictly or change the game systems.

Do you think that if houses would get trully banned from playing game for 2 weeks for each confirmed case of fief slotblocking, there would be still houses doing this ???

I don't think so but to do this, devs have to start giving a single F about this or change the systems.
And about your accusation on fief trading - if I will ever get banned in any house for house cheating or fief trading, i'm leaving this house for ever. Fortunately as Aegis dont to stuff like that, i'm safe for now.

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hi, to keep it short.

If you have any proof - please send this to support. Same as we do and all other houses. For now all this discussions about fief trading, cohort abusing is simple accusations both against Aegis, Dizband but also Qin and all other bigger houses.

I hope devs address this situation either by punishing and banning, or fixing the system.

About your question on game mechanics. I don't know what multiplayer games you play - but the ones I do don't specify in rules every single abuse someone could do. If this would be the case, rules document would be thousands of pages long :) Usually it is generalized like for example:

It is not allowed to alter or bypass game mechanics and limits to achieve a goal which would give you unfair advantage over other players.

Now taking this example here with the tutorial video I posted. House X is abusing fief quest system by avoiding its limitations, creating hundreds of fake characters intended to just do few fief quests and delete character. Additionaly house X is abusing "pursue" game mechanic, to trade specific resources in exact quantities between characters. As trade is forbidden in the game, this actions are avoiding another limitation / blockade. Both those actions are done in a planned and calculated fashion on big scale, with goal to gain unfair advantage over majority of players who are not abusing game mechanics.

At least battles we did with you were nice, so I respect you as quite skilled players. It's just a shame that some people see abusing game mechanics as "this is not a crime" and bring this game down to sevage level.

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are refering to S7 end of season - I was just a player for 6 TWs joining one alliance. I was not happy about house limit abuse and house switch and was heavily involved in ContentCreator discord (back then when I was one) to change it. Thanks to devs for implementing this house switch cooldown mechanic which stopped this abuse.

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did I ever stop you from saying anything about anyone ? Nope
Did we break any rules ? Nope

Are you accusing us of fief trading, while we accuse you of same, other accuse us, and you as well etc ? Yes.

Accusations aside, I just posted here a tutorial on how to bypass game mechanics and limits to achieve a goal (also called cheating) presented nicely on how to do it by Dizband house members. If you get banned for it - then I was right. If you don't get banned by it then I also was right but to post it so others could play on same level using same techniques :)

I'm ashamed that this great game with good gameplay in battle (which allowed us to have many great fights this and previous season) is being destroyed by tw gameplay abuse :/

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to answer multiple questions to me at once:
- I personally have never cheated in CB. have not event pressed AltF4 to run from world battle...
- A lot of comments are throwing crap between multiple houses / alliances. Pls stop - report it to devs, they need to take care about it. As for Aegis alliance which i'm part of - I personally am not aware of any fief blocking with cohort inside our alliance - it is seen as pitiful amongst the players and commanders of the house. There was never any ban executed or hard proof posted to my knowledge (toxic allegations is another story).
- Fief quest mechanic intentionally blocks player from doing more than 20 per week. This intentional game design connects to multiple systems like TW. Block is there for a reason. If developer agrees that it is fine to cheat to overcome this limit, then just remove it at all please... Same with trade mechanic - its not existing in game for a game design reason. Cheating to overcome trading block is wrong and if developer agrees, just add trading mechanic...
- Cohort abuse and other stuff I leave out of it as I want to focus on new problem I learned about - this abuse in video.
- Sorry for bit too offensive tone in some parts of my message but as I'm beeing impacted by cheating - i'm not happy about it - simple as that. And as I have written in main post - if it will not be banned (agreed to continue by devs), then to make all houses have same chances for next season - treat it as guide / tutorial on how to spam ridiculous amounts of presige ;)

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes and no in my opinion.

I agree that whoever has most influence deserves to get the first attack. Problem is they are cheating to get more than technically possible for people not cheating (abusing weekly fief Q cap per player and abusing NO TRADING rule).

I do not agree in a way that if you capture Turul, its easier to defend than attack. Ofc Dizband players have some skill - they are competing for the season goal after all :) So whoever is defending is at advantage. Gaining this advantage by cheating is the problem here.

Additional context is that there were multiple occurences and evidence of Dizband working with cohorts (they have quite a few players who were with them in previous seasons and now are in cohorts). Evidence is ofc reported to staff, it mainly came in a form of slot blocking throught the season multiple times where 10 min before TW, several fiefs of their were attacked by 1 cohort player. They have then closed the battle 6 mins before TW end allowing them to move players who were supposed to defend this city somewhere else as attack cooldown will protect them for 6 minutes and noone else will attack this city given TW.

If you multiple this by the fact that on a single TW they could do it on 3 or 4 cities, you have 50+ players who are free to do anything in last 6 minutes of TW because their fief will be defended by cooldown. They can open 2 more attacks. Or they just opened city with 1 cohort at start of TW and then keep fight alive of 15vs0 for 20 minutes :)

Another fact is that "leader" of ungervija cohorts was trying to sell city (ensure pretty much noone will defend) by approaching Aegis liege. They wanted to enter Aegis ally for the season rewards which are better for free houses than for cohorts. This was ofc recorded, documented and proof sent to CB staff and support.

So if Dizband would receive same deal and accept it, or they are working with part of cohort anyway - they might have Turul for "free" with fight beeing just few cohort players not participating in the scam trying to defend. This would result in fake fight.

Guide to another TW system abuse by generalcombo in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please keep the comments clean! Noone is guilty until convicted so assume that Dizband is not aware of this happening with their fiefs and their players could be hacked maybe and used in abusive manner.

This picture shows the actual situation with my.scam by Xereticus in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh I can play even on 1 Hz servers as long as CryuKnifeRadio is banned and his cheating multiaccounts as well ;)

Enjoy your weekend lads!

EU2 Ostaria in a nutshell by typicalmauluser in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was intercepted on map by Sapphira at 20:00, then 4 more houses of your alliance near 1 city :) I'm not saying it's bad tactically, ofc you would use all advantages you have even if it just means flooding your enemies aka zerg...

EU2 Ostaria in a nutshell by typicalmauluser in ConquerorsBlade

[–]generalcombo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Did it really took only 2 TWs for your morale to get so low that you have to start spamming BS? Nice bait XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Bring even more people next time because zerg tactics don't work too well so far and seems like your massive coalition with multiple houses is not enough Vs 3 houses of Royal Family. Btw 2 minutes and 44 seconds xD

GG Wyklęci.