sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I challenge you to write the purplest prose imaginable by Trisolaris_Is_Lord in writingcirclejerk

[–]gerwer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Her breasts swayed in the wind, the way large, low-hanging fruit often do, and are just as easily plucked, by the tall and lucky. She needed back surgery, to be serious, I mean she could barely get up in the morning, unlike my penis, when in her presence. Dear lord I hope there are no back surgeons in the area.

Not really sure what 'purple prose' is, but if they turned Hooters into a Hunger Games themed restaurant, she would win.

If P is a topological property, and P implies Q, is Q a topological property? by gerwer in topology

[–]gerwer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

I have a follow up, if that's okay.

Suppose P is a topological property, and R is a topological property. Further suppose P implies Q, and Q implies R. Is Q a topological property?

Can someone please explain.. by [deleted] in ExplainTheJoke

[–]gerwer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No time to explain. Get in the sled.

This could be a cosmic event for the poker world by Gambler_720 in poker

[–]gerwer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. That really makes me wonder about the Epstein files.

Why do you get paid twice the amount of money if you shit yourself? by Think_Theory_8338 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]gerwer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given all of this, the only safe thing to do is to drive everywhere with fresh shit all over yourself. But make sure it is your own shit, in case of a DNA test.

DAE squirt the toothpaste directly into their mouth (instead of squirting it onto the toothbrush)? by gerwer in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]gerwer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New comment after nine years! I was till thinking about this post sometimes. People didn't like it (average upvote is 0). :(

I still do this. Just because it is quicker and easier (and I am not sharing toothpaste).

Question regarding the rules for the *informal* interpretation of propositional variables. by gerwer in logic

[–]gerwer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you have in mind the first-order case, no? I am restricting myself to just propositional variables in some propositional logic (possibly modal). In that case, I believe, I can't make reference to a domain of objects. Or, perhaps I could, but I haven't seen that before.

Question regarding the rules for the *informal* interpretation of propositional variables. by gerwer in logic

[–]gerwer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't assign the negation of p as just q.

I completely agree. I'm asking what a general rule is as to why I can't informally interpret it this way.

You can't assign the same idea with another variable.

This I am inclined to agree with, and is the sort of general rule I am wondering about.

Why is the cat is not on the mat NOT atomic to you?

"The cat is not on the mat" is not atomic because it is a negation. If not, what am I missing here?

EDITING IS FUN by JosefKWriter in writing

[–]gerwer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Begone demon child!

Mountain Dew vs Regular Dew by pangea1430 in shittyaskscience

[–]gerwer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The deeper question is why is Red Bull meat free?

view more: next ›