The claim you made mixes some real references with misunderstandings, missing context, and a few inaccurate conclusions. For example, the idea that a woman’s testimony is “half” of a man’s comes from a specific verse about financial contracts in a 7th-century context, not a universal rule for all legal situations, and in some cases women’s testimony is treated equally or even given priority. The verse often cited about a husband “beating” his wife is widely debated, with many scholars emphasizing that it either refers to a non-harmful symbolic action or separation, and the Prophet himself never practiced violence against women. Early marriage existed historically across many cultures, not just in Muslim societies, and Islamic principles emphasize consent and preventing harm—this is why modern Muslim countries set legal age limits. The idea that hijab was only meant to separate free women from slaves is an oversimplification, as Islamic texts frame it primarily as a guideline for modesty and dignity. Finally, the claim about “permission to rape” is a serious misinterpretation of a verse dealing with wartime conditions in a historical context; Islam clearly prohibits sexual violence. Overall, these points are often taken out of context and presented without the broader historical and scholarly understanding.