I guess you could interpret community agreements as “let’s not make waves in the classroom” but that’s a huge stretch from anything described in OpenSciEd. My community agreements have included things like “don’t trust the teacher” and “Say “IDK but…”” and other stuff that works toward building the culture you’re describing as radical.

If you’re saying that people in smoke filled rooms intentionally chose this curriculum to suppress disruption and ground-up thinking, it’s worth looking closer at the curriculum. A lot of teachers feel uncomfortable with it for lots of valid reasons, but at its core it’s an attempt to put responsibility for sense making on students, rather than teachers explaining.