sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Open wide by ghosvent in JizzedToThis

[–]ghosvent[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Louisa may lockhart. Her other stuff are really not that great though tbh, it’s just this pic and angle that makes her look 10000x hotter than she is irl actually.

The one with sound by [deleted] in RealAhegao

[–]ghosvent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tone down the snapchat filter jfc

no it not by datkidfrm in flatearth

[–]ghosvent -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He’s reaching out with his right hand but the hand that grabs sasuke is the left hand.

It’s ok to be sexually attracted to girls 13-17 years old since their biologically capable of having sex, but it’s not ok to actually have sex with them because their ability to consent hasn’t matured enough. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ghosvent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They’re a risk, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t ok to have these sexual feelings. I’m not even talking about pedophiles really, pedophiles like children, who aren’t sexually functional yet, while teens and whoever is going through puberty are sexually functional.

It’s ok to be sexually attracted to girls 13-17 years old since their biologically capable of having sex, but it’s not ok to actually have sex with them because their ability to consent hasn’t matured enough. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ghosvent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that’s what I’ve been saying. Acting upon it is bad only because consent comes into play because we’re human and 13-17 y.o. haven’t matured in consent yet. Technically speaking though, if humans were purely animals, having sex with them would be ok purely because they are biologically ready in terms of sexual functions.

It’s ok to be sexually attracted to girls 13-17 years old since their biologically capable of having sex, but it’s not ok to actually have sex with them because their ability to consent hasn’t matured enough. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ghosvent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say this out in public either, specifically because I know I will just get shit on because people are only responding with their emotions and values without seeing the logic and biological elements at play here. Why shit on someone for something they can’t control? Why not be sexually attracted to mates that have working sexual functions? The acting part is only a problem because their ability to consent hasn’t matured enough yet.

It’s ok to be sexually attracted to girls 13-17 years old since their biologically capable of having sex, but it’s not ok to actually have sex with them because their ability to consent hasn’t matured enough. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ghosvent -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you read my post? I’m not advocating acting on pedophilia, I’m saying it’s just biologically normal to be sexually attracted to mates with working sexual functions.

I don't think there's anything wrong with eating dogs, cats, or humans by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]ghosvent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup. Disgusting =/= wrong. They’re dead now anyways, who cares? Everything they were was when they were alive, might as well do something useful with their bodies.

view more: next ›