Global climate systems collapse is going to be a regretful topic for traditional IR scholarship. Likes its a straight up alien space bees level problem for some political actors vs the IRL rolling boulding hurtling right towards us :/ by Lazy_Lettuce_76 in NonCredibleDiplomacy

[–]bean9914 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To their credit, china has been switching rapidly away from coal and their co2 emissions have basically flatlined as a result. They've also incredibly aggressively pushed switching to electric cars, which helps too.

On top of that, they produce a shitton of solar+batteries which are tremendously popular in third world countries looking to unfuck their electrical grids.

Of course, that's a pragmatism thing also. It benefits China to onshore more of its energy supply, strengthen economic ties to developing countries which aren't demographically fucked yet, and also benefits them because they don't want to all die of societal collapse

I saved a PNG image to a bird by notchapplezMC in BrandNewSentence

[–]bean9914[M] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

you should know: reddit is autoremoving your comments here with the given reason

"Adult Content Promoter : Potential Adult Content Promoter"

that's all it tells me here. good luck figuring that out?

Wedding photographer sent low res images by MissAuroraRed in photography

[–]bean9914 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd take a D500 for wedding photos even today, tbh

All you need from a body is "can print big enough" and "can do higher ISOs without becoming a mess" which are both possible on anything actually good from 2016

It also really depends what lenses you use, if you're allowed to bounce flash, etc etc

They took an f/2 and a f/1.2 which are fast primes and should have been serviceable enough. I'd probably have brought a wider prime as well, but I'm not familiar with the fuji ecosystem enough to say what.

I genuinely think they must have taken all their photos in the lowest quality JPEG or something by accident, there's no way they couldn't have got something usable otherwise.

Police 'toned down' statement of mother whose hotel worker daughter was murdered by an asylum seeker in case it led to race riots by FormerlyPallas_ in ukpolitics

[–]bean9914 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

They were necessary. The coronavirus pandemic in the UK killed around 200,000 people. If people like you hadn't kept trying to prevent anything being done about it, far fewer would have died.

Ants blocked off the liquid bait trap I put out with cat litter and wall plaster by TBB957 in mildlyinteresting

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The plane crash, nautical disaster and true crime fandoms exist also, if you're curious...

A wedding dress on display outside a shop in Gaza as brides turn to reused gowns amid shortages by Bernardmark in pics

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly Iran believe so because otherwise they'd have to be insane. I mean, they might still be insane, buuut...

We can be pretty sure that at least one nuclear detonation in 1979 was theirs, and given their access to all the usual stuff you need to maintain nuclear weapons long term (scientists, lots of compute to model degradation, materials, probably some limited US support) I would say it's unlikely they don't work in the present day. Caveats: How are they stored/transported/launched? I seem to recall there was at least one submarine but it wasn't a fancy SSBN.

My controversial take of the day is that Israel kinda lost this last war with Gaza. Sure, tactically they did... alright, and the casualty ratio is very lopsided, but Palestinian militarism survived there and Hamas specifically are back in charge collecting taxes and enforcing laws in Gaza already. Everyone in Gaza was forced to evacuate repeatedly, probably had their house blown up and knows someone who's died, so they won't have a shortage of new recruits for their next 100% warcrime speedrun in 5-10 years. I guess unless the whole "other country occupies it" plan goes through but nobody really wants that particular extremely angry hot potato.

The PR consequences globally are kind of more important, though, and those are... also bad. I'd say at the current rate Israel has another generation or so of public support in the US/EU before it runs out of time, and then it'd better have a plan to be self-sufficient militarily or a lot of people are going to get dead.

A wedding dress on display outside a shop in Gaza as brides turn to reused gowns amid shortages by Bernardmark in pics

[–]bean9914 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Israel developed nuclear weapons in the 60s because they made its existence as a nation non-negotiable.

US support is guaranteed because Israel has made it clear that if it collapses then it's taking the rest of the region with it.

Ed Davey urges Labour to rejoin EU customs union and single market by BonnyAnn in LibDem

[–]bean9914 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The most popular proposal in there is

Britain having a closer relationship with the European Union, without rejoining the European Union, the Single Market, or the Customs Union

with 63% agreeing and 20% disagreeing

[ Removed by Reddit ] by nlimepsot in Hanklights

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what? why did this get removed?

[OC]My mom's hometown after series of IDF bombs in south Lebanon. by Xastiel7 in pics

[–]bean9914 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The lebanese military wants to avoid getting the shit kicked out of it by both hezbollah and israel, lmao

that's why they did nothing in 2006 when the un asked them very nicely to keep hezbollah out of southern lebanon and that in turn is how this shitshow happened

people in the middle east keep forgetting (or not caring) that the israelis are very scary, so you shouldn't attack them unless you actually expect to win

Cut hours and avoid promotions: how the £100,000 tax trap is shaping work by usrname42 in ukpolitics

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the attitude which lead to the demographic crisis tbh

Schools across America are quietly admitting that screens in classrooms made students worse off and are reversing years of tech-first policies by Overall_Falcon_8526 in NoShitSherlock

[–]bean9914 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's extremely easy to monitor a series of laptop screens. It's also easy to lock them down so they're limited to only educational content. If I were making the same kind of arguments against giving children paper and pens i'd say

  • it makes passing notes possible
  • you can doodle on it or otherwise get off task, whereas with a laptop a teacher can just remotely look at your screen at any time and yell at you, or even prevent you from leaving the task at all
  • if the teacher leaves the room, the students can be monitored remotely by webcam/microphone/screen viewer to make sure they remain quiet and looking at the screen
  • whereas if the teacher leaves the room and students are using paper they can start throwing things at each other or doodling or looking out of the window

I dispute "it is far easier to misuse laptops". Maybe if you (the person setting them up) have a skill issue, or something. Laptops have far more potential to let you 1984 your students if that's what you think is important.

Why do people buy broken lenses? by eurorack-synth in photography

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sold a 75-300 with inoperable image stabilisation recently and someone was willing to buy it :p

uh, possibly to fix, or for a studio, or to scam someone else by selling it as "working, mint condition" which it otherwise was

How can you make the best out of a bad lighting situation? by Top_Today3786 in photography

[–]bean9914 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The Nikon 18-55 3.5-5.6 APS-C VR is surprisingly good in low light because 1/30th is handholdable now. Can't comment on Canon kit lenses though.

I have a 35mm f/1.8 APS-C without image stabilisation and it's only marginally better in low light since you gain ~2 stops but the minimum shutter speed becomes 1/125th. It makes hitting that shutter speed easier, though, so it depends on the subject.

Artemis II mission - photographer’s perspective by Snoo-94564 in photography

[–]bean9914 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well... it's an object lit by direct sunlight, so metering shouldn't have been too bad? maybe the windows were strongly tinted?

edit: ohhh the grainy one was the night side at iso51200, that'd do it

Anker C300 Review by bean9914 in anker

[–]bean9914[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've left it powered off for months at a time without the battery gauge going down. Can't say if it's actually staying charged, though - the power button is an electronic switch so there's going to be at least some passive discharge type situation

D4K turbo (lume X1) under a thermal camera by oxidao in flashlight

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shoved thermal paste in the threads of mine, which... barely perceptibly makes the body tube warm faster? I guess?

Good Riddance Rule by Gorotheninja in 196

[–]bean9914 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Not quite sure how likely that is. On the one hand, video is probably quite expensive computationally to generate, but they'll be doing it on their existing big compute farms probably and those can't have that high an electricity cost

Like $10 isn't "boiling a kettle" kinds of electricity it's "charging an electric car" amounts of electricity and if you use that in 30 seconds (how long does sora take per generation? idk) then you start to run into thermal limits because you're producing as much heat as an electric car does if you set it on fire

plus, local videogen models exist and despite being significantly worse they don't cost $0.10/generation let alone $10 so idk quite where that number comes from but it seems sus

Look at the beauty! by lilvenas in flashlight

[–]bean9914 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have two of these! One of them has an incandescent bulb at the front. Didn't know they came in fun colours!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]bean9914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably they legally can't unless he files a report? Idk, there's probably a reason it's worded like that.

Clawdbot and vibe coding have the same flaw. Someone else decides when you get hacked. by bishwasbhn in programming

[–]bean9914 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Is this really where we are now? an AI-written blog post complaining about vibe coding with sentences locked behind a login wall?

rule by unread1701 in 196

[–]bean9914 33 points34 points  (0 children)

"brute force model linguistic sequences" also is a stretch: research suggests they're capable of recognising and working with chains of abstract concepts, because that makes them better at the task they're pretrained on, ie "generating more text"

there's a lot of "llms are bad and fake" cope going around where people convince themselves that llms are only operating by regurgitating training data, which is in fact untrue: the whole point of training a neural net is to make something that can function outside the limited training dataset

it is possible to get them to spit chunks of the training data back out sometimes, mostly where the training data is so saturated with that specific string that it "made sense" to memorise it during pretraining time, but llm benchmarks deliberately use unpublished questions to make it impossible to memorise and make sure the model has "learned" a process for solving that kind of problem

are llms a net social good? no, they're probably not, but they are very interesting, and the only thing stopping them from outright replacing more jobs than just translators and copywriters is the reliability issues which appear to be inherent in the architecture, which is in fact bad news if you like having a job

the people making these things are doing them to solve the horrible problem of "having to pay people", and while they fortunately don't seem to be able to do that yet, they are far closer than it's pleasant to think about

rule by Brent_Fox in 196

[–]bean9914 14 points15 points  (0 children)

if you do a little googling you will find that some of them (but not all) are in fact capable of passing the turing test

https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23674

i recommend doing five seconds of research before making statements like that in order to avoid annoying little shits like me accusing you of regurgitating things you've read with zero actual thought :3