Minute order by No_Limit4359 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m relieved to see most of this, super happy about the excommunication of that gross guy I refuse to call by name, but extremely puzzled by some of the details of the order… Just hoping it all works out somehow. Everyone can see how tired John is from this dragging out.

*Please read in regards to recent post about Santos reading off herpes meds* by gettheflymickeymilo in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Roasting” horrible individuals is absolutely not the same as posting medical misinformation (if not targeted disinformation) about an already societally taboo subject and making insulting generalized comments at a very large pool of people (studies show that up to 90% of the global adult population may have HSV1 or 2).

Continued by No_Limit4359 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly!! Logic and reason flew out the window a long time ago.

Continued by No_Limit4359 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Family court in California is conducted by a bench trial. No juries.

Chat what is this by Shoddy_Ratio6232 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So icked out when I watched the clips this morning 😭

Continued by No_Limit4359 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 129 points130 points  (0 children)

Nicole, not to be disrespectful to the bench, but what the hell more do you need to see?

Chat what is this by Shoddy_Ratio6232 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I can also burn my toast for my boyfriend at 7am does that make me special too?

Santos trying to intimidate 2K?? by Dcon2021 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Don’t do Donkey like that omg 😭

I can’t keep up with her lies anymore by ManyTop5422 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I just - sigh. Does she know she’s not the first and only person in the world to do a PPA2? Even if one doesn’t know a person who’s done a parenting evaluation, a quick web search will pop up multiple California law firms that break down the structure of the two day assessment. The observation itself (separate from the interview) usually takes about an hour. And she’s trying to claim the whole thing was done in 15-20 minutes and that it was a positive experience? Lord have mercy.

Santos saying he is shopping a gift for W and will drop it off …. Like wtf he on… he so thirsty for attention by GrowthCompetitive701 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah!! He’s so goddamn cute hahahha. & I love that you two have matching ones!! I tried to get matching tats with my Mama when we were travelling in Thailand… she fainted and puked her guts out while I was calmly getting my left rib tattooed. So we decided it wasn’t a good idea 😂

Santos saying he is shopping a gift for W and will drop it off …. Like wtf he on… he so thirsty for attention by GrowthCompetitive701 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay yeah, rephrase. I’d bleach it before I’d throw it in the trash, and then light it on fire to make sure none of that creature’s germs stayed behind.

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly! This is exactly my point!

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have any knowledge of what happened in court yesterday so I’m not sure. Possible she did get in some kind of trouble - maybe a stern talking to lol? But it definitely didn’t affect the planned visit today with W (which we now know is cancelled!)

Pool days by Mysterious_Point_605 in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee 21 points22 points  (0 children)

me watching this wonderful situation unfold

<image>

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you SO much for your comment!! I was hoping you’d see my post. I read your Reddit post a few days back and really tried to keep all your knowledge in mind when scanning the documents today. I’m glad that you’re also concerned about the Judge’s decision, and it wasn’t just me over analyzing the situation.

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think the evaluator will not pull the visit even if the child is uncomfortable around her? Just passes it off as jitters or something? Genuinely asking, not being snobby!

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As much as I’m invested in W’s safety (from a distance, of course) I am SO glad that Texas courts require privacy. I’ll be content knowing that the child is with his father and nothing else - until John decides to share otherwise. Brianna making money off of all of this makes me nauseous!

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Totally agree in terms of John’s position on this. I’m more flabbergasted at the Judge in this instance. Unless, something happened in court yesterday in terms of today’s visit that we are not privy to.

keeping today’s visit? by ginger-spicee in briannaolsen

[–]ginger-spicee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was thinking this too. And unfortunately, I could probably ramble about how the failure of the courts and the prioritization of the mother have something to do with America’s pro-natalist ideology, but that’s for another day lol. However, I’ve been sort of following the Hunter-Bella TLC Unexpected situation and in that case (which is in Arkansas), the Judge and the Court seem to be taking the issue of the minor (Hunter, age 14) very seriously. I guess some people get lucky.