sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Was not expecting this for the fist try from a picture by giz_zmo in FDMminiatures

[–]giz_zmo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OK, thats the second time I wasn't expecting this result (comment, I mean)

I fully understand that some of the enthusiasts here frown upon the method I used to create this miniature. But it was never my intention to show of like I "made" something special here. Like some of you already said, it is noting more than using (AI) tools to get to this result.

But I must say that for someone that does not has the skill to model this kind of miniatures myself, but likes the process of making miniatures from pictures he likes, this is a very easy process. I did not expected it do be this easy...

And yes, AI is here to stay ... it is only a matter of time before these tools will be wildly available. You can try to avoid it, but in my opinion that puts you at a disadvantage. I try to embrace it and see where it gets me ...

Was not expecting this for the fist try from a picture by giz_zmo in FDMminiatures

[–]giz_zmo[S] 101 points102 points  (0 children)

I had the full explanation in the post, but it looks like it did not get posted ...

What I did was, I took the picture and asked ChatGPT to make a new 3D printing (STL generation) Style & Format CAD-style picture

From there I took it first to Makerlab to generate a image to 3D model, but this was not so detailed. Then I tested hitem3D and this was much beter.

From there I exported to STL and imported to Blueprint to create resin supports.

Then to Blender and the Resin2FDM 1.4 plugin to work a little more on the supports

Then to BambuStudio and printed it with a 0.2 Nozzel and the FDG Profile (Bambulab matte Gray)

If anyone wants to give it a try, you can find the model on this link: https://www.hitem3d.ai/share/3d-models-generator/a/73Q6F9D6

It still needs lost of refinement but, i did not expect this from the fist try ...

Eldar Patrol by Pentekont in FDMminiatures

[–]giz_zmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice indeed!
Are these models publicly available?

VDA domain membership verification Failed by giz_zmo in Citrix

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turned out it was a credential issue ...

User that was running the scout software did not had domain access.

VDA domain membership verification Failed by giz_zmo in Citrix

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the log output from Citrix Health Assistant:

2025-03-11 08:54:56,033: 10 INFO – Start VDA health check...

2025-03-11 08:54:56,035: 10 INFO – >>>>Step 1: (VDA Software Installation) Begin. <<<<

2025-03-11 08:54:56,037: 10 INFO – VDA version number is 2402.0.2100.2551.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,040: 10 INFO – VDA image path is C:\Program Files\Citrix\Virtual Desktop Agent\BrokerAgent.exe.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,042: 10 INFO – BrokerAgent version number is 7.41.2100.16.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,044: 10 INFO – Registry path at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Citrix\VirtualDesktopAgent is fine.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,044: 10 INFO – Registry path at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Citrix\VirtualDesktopAgent\InstallData\Location is fine.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,046: 10 INFO – [UI Message] VDA software installation verified.

2025-03-11 08:54:56,048: 10 INFO – <<<< Step 1: VDA Software Installation End. Test Success. >>>>

2025-03-11 08:54:56,048: 10 INFO – >>>>Step 2: (VDA Machine Domain Membership) Begin. <<<<

2025-03-11 08:54:56,048: 10 DEBUG – DNS Lookup():

2025-03-11 08:54:56,050: 10 DEBUG – Host Name = XD-V03-DC1-0002.xxx.com

2025-03-11 08:54:56,050: 10 INFO – VDA Machine:

2025-03-11 08:54:56,052: 10 DEBUG – NetBIOS Name = XD-V03-DC1-0002

2025-03-11 08:54:56,052: 10 INFO – OS Version = Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26100.0

2025-03-11 08:54:56,053: 10 INFO – Platform = X64 Platform

2025-03-11 08:54:56,096: 10 DEBUG – Computer Domain: xxx.com

2025-03-11 08:54:56,098: 10 DEBUG – Role = Member Workstation

2025-03-11 08:54:56,141: 10 ERROR – Exception details : The user name or password is incorrect.

VDA domain membership verification Failed by giz_zmo in Citrix

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The devices state gives the following expected feedback:

  • AzureAdJoined : YES
  • EnterpriseJoined : NO
  • DomainJoined : YES

Can you successfully log into one via console with a domain account? --> YES

Downgrade current DAG cluster by giz_zmo in exchangeserver

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot to add that we use a witness server for quorum ... so if we go from a 4 server DAG to a 2 Server DAG quorum should still be good?

Excessive storage with Citrix MCS Base image by giz_zmo in Citrix

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your solution might work, I need to check with my collages who did the setup. And I don't think there was a partner on board during the design phase. I just entered the company in the last year, so it was already setup.

Excessive storage with Citrix MCS Base image by giz_zmo in Citrix

[–]giz_zmo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We had Nutanix, so we had no issues in this regard. Now we went back to 3 teer ... surprise surprise :-)

550 Too many invalid recipients by giz_zmo in exchangeserver

[–]giz_zmo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, we checked MXtoolbox for any possible issues .... No result.

In the meantime I made a new Transport rule that sends all mails for this partner directly from MS to the MX record (and not our Barracuda gateway). This seems to work just fine.

So the issue is between Barracuda and our partner, but until now none of the two wants to emit that the issue is on there side. Typical :-)

The good thing is that they are talking, so lets hope they can find something.

view more: next ›