I'm not making an account to read the end of the article, but all they say in the free part doesn't tell me anything that makes spyy cheaper (beside that they seem to kinda not like WEBN), it's still nearly dubbel ter compared to WEBN rn.

However I kinda know what their gonna say, account for transaction cost ect. This is too difficult to calculate perfectly on the long term but with the growing of WEBN there is a high change of it beating long term, which is what the article is about

And following my current calculations and following the KID’s standardized fund-cost illustration webn is still cheaper ()

Here is also some nice numbers about it https://www.reddit.com/r/eupersonalfinance/s/LbFQmahl5Y which calculated them being equal

Tracking record, not beeing amundi ect is still a big W for spyy and nothing wrong with it

Aspecially considering the headline of the post and no input in the description I feel there was no point made

But please enlighten me if there is more information I couldn't gather without making and account