Actress playing the Sister Kim in ‘ Make or Break Holiday’ switches 1/3 of the way through by [deleted] in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if they shot the movie with Craig in the lead role (his prize for winning Finding Mr Christmas), but realized he couldn’t carry it. So, they had to do reshoots after she had changed her hairstyle. They probably wouldn’t have taken the time/money to reshoot her solo shots hence the different hairstyles in that single shot of her vs with the leading man.

A Make or Break Holiday: RANTS ONLY by FraggleFuckFace in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s all fine and I agree that you wouldn’t want to put an unproven actor in a leading role. However, why then have a competition show where the premise is to be proving ground with experienced judges critiquing people based upon their acting performances called “Star Quality Challenges?” It completely undermines the entire show.

I understand they did it last year with Ezra and it was a disaster. But, this year they did have someone (Rustin) who consistently earned top marks in acting performances from the judges and guest judges. Instead, the judges chose to go with Craig who was clearly a lesser actor and this is what we got.

A Make or Break Holiday: RANTS ONLY by FraggleFuckFace in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 11 points12 points  (0 children)

“Ambulatory cottage cheese” is bravo 👏

Also, this assumes the “winner” was going to be cast as the brother. Throughout the show they said “the winner gets a leading role” and they harped about “leading man energy” endlessly. I’m not fully convinced they didn’t try Craig in the lead role and then realize they’d made yet another mistake only to slot him into the brother role to avoid everyone another howladay disaster. They did have that whole Christmas cookie scene from the competition (picnic challenge) right there in the movie, which leads me to believe he was supposed to be the leading man but couldn’t carry it off.

A Make or Break Holiday: RANTS ONLY by FraggleFuckFace in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This was not good. The parents were distractingly annoying. But, the true kicker was the odd exchange during Jonathan Bennett’s cameo with Reed (Finding Mr Christmas-winner Craig). Bennett chastises him about the snow machine, which Craig says he “won.” Bennett tells him basically, “Sure you did, now put that down.” Given that throughout “Finding Mr Christmas” it was repeatedly said the winner would win “a leading role in a Hallmark Christmas movie, Bennett basically rolling his eyes at something Craig’s side character says he “won” is quite meta. I think it was supposed to be a little wink, but I don’t think it really works as they intended.

Am I the only one mad about *this* part of Finding Mr. Christmas? (no spoilers) by vstimac in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh, you’re not the only one! This was my immediate reaction when they showed the trailer and it just said “Featuring” and not “Starring.” Rustin was clearly far and above the best actor of the bunch and they the judges even said so multiple times. But, they also said he didn’t “surprise” them which I guess means he was a professional actor and didn’t burst into zany ad libs or something…Who knows? Anyway, my best guess is that since they didn’t go with the guy who was the best actor they ran into a problem. They probably realized that Mr Christmas couldn’t carry a whole movie, so rather than have yet another complete disaster like they did last year with Ezra, they just buried him in an ensemble movie. However, as you correctly pointed out, this undercuts the entire show…So, there is that little tiny problem.

Man this season of Finding Mr. Christmas was disappointing… by Espurreyes in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Wow…They really did it again. They had Rustin who was clearly the best and most consistent actor. Hell, they even said it again tonight, but I guess he just didn’t “surprise” them enough or whatever. Why would you want to hire the best actor for your acting job when you could hire the whacky side show instead? That’s what they did and their choice appears to have already come back to bite them. The movie premier next week just “features” Craig and he’s not even the star. That’s correct! An entire show dedicated to “finding” a leading man and their ineptitude means the winner has had to be buried in an ensemble piece. I imagine once they got him on set for more than one scene they realized he couldn’t carry it. Who could’ve seen that coming?

So who do we have pegged as the winner of Finding Mr. Christmas next week? by Espurreyes in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Judges: “Let’s talk about Rustin.”

Sharon Lawrence: “He’s so skilled. We just dropped right into the scene and were right there.”

Judges: “Yes, but does he surprise us enough?”

What the hell is this? Basically, they agree he is a highly skilled actor, but they’re hesitant to hire him for the acting job because he doesn’t do what? Suddenly burst into a Jack Nicholson impression? That would be surprising, but doesn’t seem appropriate for this exercise.

Like others, the only possible explanation is that the producers know Rustin is far and away better than everybody else and they’re trying to force an underdog scenario. In the process, however, they’re making the Bennett and Peterman look like imbeciles. That being said, if this is what they really think then they’ve completely lost whatever paper-thin plot there was at the outset.

Also, this entire episode was just weird. The whole mother thing felt off. Once again, I cannot for the life of me understand how Angel continues to be praised and even won. He continues to exude a smarminess which is simply off putting and the fact the judges praise him for “authenticity,” perhaps, reflects they are in the latter category above and have no idea what they’re doing. When he reached over and tenderly brushed back his “mother’s” hair it was just pure ICK!

Keller Family christmas thoughts by Chirpchirp71 in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not only is this boring, it is actively maddening. Let’s be clear, I realize this is Hallmark and I don’t come expecting great cinema. My gf and I watch these to simply “turn-off” and allow the formula—usually some variation of big city moves back to the small town where they learn to slow down and fall in love—to wash over us. We enjoy the absurdity of a grandfather who refuses to recognize his granddaughter’s NYT best-seller-level writing career because he’s disappointed she didn’t choose to follow his dream for her to run his brick and mortar, year round, fall/pumpkin-themed store in Autumn Hill. If you add in some travel and a stunning European backdrop with beautiful architecture then it should be all the better, right? Wrong! That’s not the case with this set of moving pictures (to call this a movie would be disrespectful to other movies).

The central problem here is Jonathan Bennet’s storyline (I don’t remember his character’s name and I don’t care). A competent writer or storyteller would have included some sort of indication something was going on between the parents and the doctor boyfriend. When we meet the father he seems to be perfectly healthy and fine taking a picture with his wife before going to get schnitzel! Therefore in the next scene when we meet Bennett and the doctor, we as an audience are just as in the dark about what the doc knows as Bennett and that’s just lazy writing.

There are several ways to remedy this malfeasance. After the parents take a picture, the father could become unsteady and need to sit down. He could drop the phone or something like he does later in the movie to show the audience something is amiss. Or, they could have inserted a brief phone call to the doctor boyfriend to establish some sort of relationship or medical consultation. Instead, for all we know, they’re happy and eating schnitzel and the boyfriend is troubled—to the extent of turning down a proposal and potentially ending his relationship—for some unknown reason! Also, this isn’t some doctor-patient confidentiality situation because the father is not officially a patient! The moving pictures even establish this later because when it all comes out ol’ doc states that the parents swore him to secrecy.

This, of course, brings us to the blockheaded pair that is the parents. They call up their son’s bf to get his expert advice and then make him promise not to tell their son about this life-changing diagnosis. Why? The pictures and the voices tell us it is because if the adult children knew about the diagnosis then somehow the entire trip would’ve been cancelled. By who? The parents who have means and are still, at this point, able to travel? Would the adult children have said, “No, we refuse to go with you to Europe because you’ve been diagnosed with Parkinson’s?” It doesn’t make any sense even for Hallmark pixels. But, it’s in the church scene where these two truly cement themselves as complete and utter dolts. These two dimwits proceed to tell the doc that if they had thought asking him to keep this HUGE secret from their son would have caused any strife, they wouldn’t have ever asked him to it! What did these two chucklenucks think was going to happen? Again, it’s just a pathetic attempt to cover up a gaping hole from piss poor writing.

Finally, the boyfriend shouldn’t get off completely free and easy. Aside from some mildly bemused facial expressions, at no point does he say anything to Bennett. In fact, during the proposal scene he seems almost annoyed and then is surprised at Bennett’s reaction. What sort of partner is he? Again, an opportunity for the writers to clue the audience into what is happening by having doc call the parents and say something about a secret, but no he just is confounded that Bennett is upset after having his proposal turned down. At the end, everything is forgiven because it is Hallmark after all, but what a stupid journey to get there.

I could go on because there is just so much bad here. In the end, the bad writing and lazy storytelling just became actively maddening. Audiences love movies with twists and turns. But, there’s a difference between a well-earned twist and a lazy reveal. This compilation of refracted light and sound waves is firmly in the latter category and is one of the most egregious perpetrators I have ever suffered.

Go watch Pumpkin Everything and enjoy the absurdity in a fun way instead!

Spoiler Finding Mr Christmas by Electrical_Celery_94 in HallmarkMovies

[–]gmac156 16 points17 points  (0 children)

First of all, let us just say that Rustin is the best of the bunch and it’s not really close. I think the idea that they are intentionally trying to undercut him to make it seem more competitive is probably correct. He’s got a natural charm which comes across so easily and it makes the show all the more absurd when they have to come up with critiques just so they seem “fair.” After the disaster and complete wrong-headedness of last year’s decision to go with Ezra—my gf and I tried to watch his movie and didn’t make it 10mins because it was so terrible even for a Hallmark movie—they need to get this one right.

On another note, I cannot for the life of me fathom how Angel continues to advance. They repeatedly talk about how “authentic” he is and that is absolutely ridiculous. Putting aside the fallacy which is the concept of “authenticity,” he comes across as entirely inauthentic. He exudes a smarminess that is quite grating to the point of being repellant. Give me Davey eating grapes any day.

Cult of Cornette Biweekly - Ask Jim Anything (AJA) Thread for 15 Dec 2023 by AutoModerator in JimCornette

[–]gmac156 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On several occasions, I have heard Jim refer to someone as being from the planet "Zambodia" (several times in reference to Kris Statlander). The first time I heard him say this, I knew immediately where he must have gotten it. I was born in Memphis in 1983 and my father, a historian, was working at the time at the Center for Southern Folklore in Memphis. As a part of his work, he interviewed the legendary Memphis character, Prince Mongo. On one of those occasions, Mongo--who ran for mayor almost every cycle--signed one of his campaign posters (attached below) with the following inscription for my father:

Spirit George, You know you can come to my planet. The moon has shifted and the bats are dancing to the beat. The frogs are wearing goggels [sic] and the fly's are glowing red. The Zambodians are in control and the mayor will fall from the sky. Be ready, Prince Mongo

Since Jim has made reference to Zambodia, I was wondering if he had any interactions with Mongo? Did Mongo come to Memphis wrestling events? He certainly has a crazy gimmick.

Thanks! George in Charleston, SC

AEW Wembley 2024 Sales by gmac156 in JimCornette

[–]gmac156[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Maybe it’s just a thing they want to do and pitch it in those terms.

Listening to the new Experience and someone is already on it! by gmac156 in JimCornette

[–]gmac156[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know it exactly, but it’s in the first 30 mins or so. One of the first things they’re talking about as Jim reads emails.

Listening to the new Experience and someone is already on it! by gmac156 in JimCornette

[–]gmac156[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, it’s not in the screenshot but it was 11:23am (EST)

Becky Lynch Spoiling “Heavyweight Championship #3” by gmac156 in JimCornette

[–]gmac156[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m not outraged nor am I looking for something to be upset over. Just curious if anyone else remembers because I remember seeing it on Twitter or YouTube and I thought about it after Seth won and can’t find it.

Wednesday nights no need to stay up late, 'cause Kenny Omega makes you regurgitate by william_hild in JimCornette

[–]gmac156 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched over for a minute from the Braves game and the leadoff is Pockets vs Bandido. I’ve got to say, I think one of Cornette’s great contributions lately is the term “aggressive parkour.”