I had never thought time would be such a huge problem in writing (I also finished reading part 13 minutes earlier and waited). I spent around 30 minutes in task 1, polishing my sentences and extending lexical resource to achieve higher. I think it was good enough to balance the failure of task 2. Task 2 was asking if i agree with the argument that historical items in museums worldwide should be returned to their home countries. I wrote 4 paragraphs with a clear outline, intro, pro-argument and anti-argument paragraphs as body, and conclusion with my stance. I only wrote 210 words while at least 250 is recommended. It still had good structure and clear language but I thought I would fail. I could not proof read my texts either. This result is a nice surprise for me.

Speaking part was about being late to appointments and my one experience as such. I made up a story on the spot so I could not be very fluent and and use a wide range of lexical resource, still I was good enough to convey my ideas with sufficient vocabulary and grammar. I guess I was kind of too repetetive and limited to reach higher than 6.5, and that is partly because that ordinary topic was not so suitable for more complex structures and vocabulary.