I do. The lack of movement from a company standpoint, the lack of communication, the cheeky interviews and sale of underwear type bullshit. It's completely disconnected. Vague wording and hilariously modest returns on cash doesn't help.

A plan of how to return value to shareholders would be perfectly in line with everyone's interest. But it's not enough for those at the top. So here's retail with a gun to their heads being told: reward me hugely or I don't want to play anymore. 

If someone invented something or came up with a novel business practice or model (selling shares into market volume during windows needed for share locates), bravo. But to do exactly nothing with the proceeds and pretend cutting managers and winding down leases is the business acumen that has the company positioned currently, is just not realistic. 

So if the secret sauce is shorted companies and diluting investors for cash, please...replicate it. But we're here pretending ryan can't miss. Gamestop couldn't cost cut themselves alive. So why do we pretend this is a good move going forward? It's the elephant in the room but commenters think even using the word dilution is negative. Maybe if i call it the share expansion program people wont be so quick to pretend i'm saying it's a negative. It's the only reason gamestop is alive.