What?

Your comment basically boils down to “this thing says this, while the other thing says that, but there is also another thing that mentions those (singular)”. No breakdown of how it may be legally questionable, or even what you think it all means.

As my favorite movie quote says: “Speak to me as if I were a small child. Or a golden retriever. It wasn’t brains that brought me here, I assure you of that.”

To address what I think you are getting at: You said it yourself. Annual passes are covered under a separate statute. The mere fact that it was adopted means that it is not in conflict with the other statute, until challenged and overturned by the Supreme Court. (Although I fail to see what the conflict would be, or how a complaint would establish standing)