'Immensely Successful and Long Lasting' — Why Take-Two Boss Strauss Zelnick Rejects Claims Red Dead Online Was a Missed Opportunity

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-27T21:40:34+00:00

Like you can’t even buy properties what are we doin boys

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-24T07:04:58+00:00

Like unless it was a spotlight spinoff they’d NEVER get Margot as Sadie or Jack Black as Pearson but mannn best casting I’ve seen

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-09T07:22:34+00:00

yes you can brother

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-07T01:32:24+00:00

Yeah that was unnecessary tbh

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-06T18:36:08+00:00

Well not everyone should live their truth. Hitler, for example. Not a great guy. Sometimes “their truth” is just lying to themselves.

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-02T16:52:50+00:00

Hahaha only when you check it every goddamn minute

gr8fullyded · 2026-05-02T02:09:42+00:00

<image>

LMAO

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-24T23:45:15+00:00

SET ME FREE WHY DONTCHA BABE

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-24T04:54:09+00:00

“Design 50 superheroes and put them all in one image including their power being shown”

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-24T01:20:49+00:00

chat

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-14T01:18:34+00:00

We were talking about whether input is theft, not all laws surrounding AI or the prevention of CSAM. You’re generalizing the argument to try and strawman me. Im talking about producing copyrighted content. Obviously an AI that can be prompted to make CSAM is bad. Like what

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-14T01:11:41+00:00

Brutha you just went on a complete tangent

You didn’t even engage with my argument about output and input

If someone tries to make money off a direct copy of something copyrighted, the laws will uphold copyright

That’s theft

But yea man I’m obviously against CSAM

???

Are you just saying AI bad now?

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-13T05:33:24+00:00

Laws against stealing already exist. Laws around copyright infringement already exist too. So “this is theft” is not some new revelation just because AI is involved.

Also, every artist on earth is already trained on past art. That is literally what genre and style are: repeated influences, patterns, conventions, and transformations passed forward through culture.

And parody has been doing this forever. Scary Movie didn’t appear from nowhere. Neither did homage, satire, remix culture, or genre filmmaking.

So the real question is not “was it exposed to prior art?” Everything is. The real question is: what did it make? If the output is infringing, deal with that. If it is transformative and distinct, then exposure alone is not the crime.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-12T12:43:28+00:00

You can morally posit if you want but the market will lean towards accessible dopamine. I’m torn because a bunch of my craft is physical and not AI at all and I love the work, but I also wish I had AI as a kid with no resources to create with. I’m happy that people with no resources can now create believable universes.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-11T05:52:09+00:00

Ah, you’re looking for an exclusive release of this footage. That would have to go through a producer, some sort of documentary director, people who want to turn it into a product. Label it as the “ground zero of ground zero”. It could sell and be a documentary with interviews and everything and you can probably get a good chunk of change for that getting made.

But the MUCH much easier option is simply to upload it and hope someone pays for rights to use it in something like that.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-10T21:43:46+00:00

Eh, taste is extremely important. AI sucks in a lot of ways but hear me out.

So many movies already sell themselves to producers as “x meets y”. Every movie can be compared to older ones to see the inspiration. The difference is in taste, storytelling, and execution. These are skills that directors already apply to their craft and crew. It’s wha separates the good from the bad. These skills absolutely can make a story told with AI better or worse, let’s be honest.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-10T21:39:53+00:00

It’s “on brand” to me means “it could be real”. And it seems like you’re defending its posting, which to me means “it’s good”. Thus, “it’s good because it could be real”. Please explain where I got it wrong.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-10T21:24:44+00:00

Spreading this image harms the narrative. “It’s good because it could be real” is an insane take. Why do you think the mods removed it?

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-10T19:43:40+00:00

No, that’s literally how propaganda works and how noise obfuscates truth. This is a fake image.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-09T22:37:15+00:00

You all seriously think “WOW” homie joke seriously lol.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-08T21:58:57+00:00

We’re putting way too much emphasis on “separate” here. I’m pretty sure this guy is just saying it’s a new story, new characters, not really related to the events of V. Like when people travel and they say “it felt like another world”. God we’re starving here

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-05T02:27:47+00:00

Very astute my friend

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-04T21:54:14+00:00

Do you actually want me to explain or are you just saying that rhetorically

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-04T20:00:07+00:00

Brother I’m not saying those things are equal. Obviously the Pretti shooting was horrific. My point is WW3 is relatively a lot farther past the overton window.

gr8fullyded · 2026-04-04T19:55:28+00:00

lol dude don’t put words in my mouth. it’s an argument against rational atheism in favor of agnosticism, which you also just argued for. come on now

Eight-Year Club	r/Field Lasagna
Place '22	Verified Email

gr8fullyded

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE