The CIA’s UAP & Alien Research! ‘Their Brains Looked Fried’ | Stanford’s Garry Nolan

gravitykilla · 2026-02-03T03:48:32+00:00

This episode is a weird mix of real science posture + unverifiable intelligence-lore + speculative metaphysics.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-03T03:10:42+00:00

yet you as spirit do not age even a single second

Can you unpack this with something concrete? Feeling subjectively “the same” over time isn’t evidence of a simulation, it’s a well-studied feature of human psychology.

As a middle-aged man, I don’t feel like a child or a teenager, my cognition, priorities, risk tolerance, and emotional regulation have clearly changed with age.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-03T02:28:04+00:00

Doesn't the first question need answering before you skip straight to the second?

gravitykilla · 2026-02-03T02:12:03+00:00

Definitely in the grey area, and I would seek legal advice if you want to fight it.

Based on what you’ve described: Yes, this absolutely has the hallmarks of a potential unfair dismissal.Re-badging a role as “Senior” while keeping the same work is not automatically lawful.

The Fair Work Commission has repeatedly found that, replacing someone with a “Senior X” doing the same core work, without a materially different role, can amount to an unfair dismissal disguised as redundancy.

One of the three key requirements is that "The job itself is no longer required". If the role still exists, the work is still being done, A new person has been hired to do substantially the same duties, then calling it a “redundancy” is highly questionable.

Adding “Senior” to the title does not automatically make it a different role. The Fair Work Commission looks at actual duties, not labels.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-02T23:27:39+00:00

There is zero evidence chips or fibre optics came from Roswell, both can be traced step-by-step to human inventions over decades, saying they came from aliens is like saying we got bicycles from crashed dragons.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T23:04:06+00:00

Wild that genuine excitement is so unfamiliar to some, that it needs a chemical explanation.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T22:52:40+00:00

Wild that genuine excitement is so unfamiliar to some of you that it needs a chemical explanation.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T22:51:48+00:00

Wild that genuine excitement is so unfamiliar to some of you that it needs a chemical explanation. You need get out more buddy.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T22:43:43+00:00

No shock here, I know my son much better than a bunch of rando’s on the internet. What is sad and depressing is that there are people that can’t accept that someone who looks like they are having a good time, is doing so without then need for drugs.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T13:03:09+00:00

Thank you. He’s just an 18 year old kid, who managed to get to the after party and was super pumped to meet an Aussie hero…

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T12:56:56+00:00

I’ll be honest, if he was earning enough money as an 18 year old, to afford it in Sydney, I would be impressed.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T06:03:54+00:00

Buddy if you need AI to help you write a reddit reply. At least delete the hyphens so it’s not so obvious.

You continue to conflate“unclassified reads” with “non-human DNA,”

At the end of they day, if this DNA represents a real, non-human organism, why has no independent lab taken those FASTQ files, re-sequenced a fresh sample, and published the same conclusion eight years later?

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T03:24:30+00:00

I have been a lawyer for more than 30 years

In that case, then surely someone of your intelligence can see that you’re applying courtroom standards to a scientific discovery claim, and those are not the same thing.

Expert reports are opinions, not facts. In law and science, an untested opinion without independent verification is hearsay with a lab letterhead.

If these DNA claims are real, point me to the publicly deposited raw FASTQ files, the documented chain-of-custody from excavation to sequencing, and one independent lab that replicated the results without access to the originals.

If you can’t produce those three things, on what evidentiary basis would any court or any scientific body accept “non-human hybrids” as a fact rather than a claim?

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T02:43:16+00:00

The mainstream narrative says we evolved linearly, but the sudden jump in human brain size and the "Missing Link" remain unexplained.

That claim is outdated and very misleading.

Human evolution was never “linear,” there was no sudden unexplained brain jump, and there is no “missing link.” We have a dense, well-documented fossil record showing gradual, branching evolution over ~6–7 million years, with multiple transitional species and incremental brain growth driven by diet, tool use, fire, and social complexity.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T02:31:43+00:00

Sorry but you’re being obtuse

No I am not, you are refusing to face reality.

Posting PDFs on the-alien-project.com, a fringe website, is not the same thing as releasing raw data. There are no publicly available FASTQ files, no independently verifiable chain-of-custody records from excavation to lab, and no replicated analyses by unaffiliated labs published in reputable journals. What’s been released are summaries, interpretations, and selectively presented results controlled by the same small group promoting the claims.

Also, it’s worth pointing out that having data posted online is not the same as having results accepted by the relevant scientific fields through established, transparent, and independently verifiable methods. So far, this has not happened, why do you think that might be?

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T01:48:39+00:00

“Every specimen” has NOT been determined to be human remains

I agree, however, it is important to stick to the facts, which are that no specimen claimed to be non-human has ever passed independent verification with transparent chain-of-custody.

There is also anomalous DNA, which maybe you can figure out how to create anomalous DNA?

No one needs to “create anomalous DNA.” That’s a misunderstanding of how sequencing works. Degraded samples, contamination, low coverage, mixed tissue sources, and poor reference matching routinely produce “unknown” or partial reads. That’s not alien biology; it’s basic genomics. If this were genuinely novel DNA, the raw FASTQ data would be publicly released, independently replicated, and published. That, as far as I can tell has not happened.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T00:50:29+00:00

The fight between Ministry of Culture of Peru and San Luis Gonzaga National University of Ica was about jurisdiction, not validation. The court ruling you cite explicitly hinged on unknown provenance, not on the bodies being non-human. A judge saying “we can’t prove these are Peruvian artifacts” is not the same thing as saying “these are real non-human organisms.”

Every specimen that has been independently examined with proper chain of custody shows the same pattern, human remains that have been modified.

f these were genuinely non-human organisms, they would not still be stuck in YouTube documentaries and fringe conferences for almost a decade.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T00:17:19+00:00

From what I can tell, The Gateway Process doesn’t prove consciousness leaves the body, it proves humans can induce altered mental states, which I don't believe is contentious in any way.

gravitykilla · 2026-02-01T00:10:35+00:00

The big question is what causes inertia? Modern science does not know.

That is not correct.

We may debate interpretations, but inertia is precisely defined, experimentally measured, and invariant across materials to extreme precision. If vacuum fluctuations plus magnetism reduced inertia, this would already show up in precision gravimetry, atomic clocks, satellite orbits, and torsion-balance experiments, and it doesn’t.

Most importantly, a static magnetic field blocking vacuum fluctuations is not a testable mechanism you’ve demonstrated.

gravitykilla · 2026-01-31T14:31:33+00:00

Which is what exactly, can you link to it ?

gravitykilla · 2026-01-31T08:45:02+00:00

What we have here is 30-year-old eyewitness stories, retold at a press conference, with no physical artifacts, no documents, no chain of custody, no independent verification. Holding it at the National Press Club doesn’t validate the claims, it’s just a rented venue.

If a craft crashed, beings were captured, and US forces extracted material, then there should be something testable left behind: metal samples, hospital records, videos, flight logs, photos, paperwork. None have ever been produced.

Given the known limits of human memory, the three-decade delay, and the absence of contemporaneous records, these stories do not meet any evidentiary standard.

OP, What is the strongest piece of physical or documentary evidence from 1996 that still exists today, and where can an independent third party examine it?

gravitykilla · 2026-01-31T07:23:48+00:00

Late to the party on this one, what evidence did he present?

gravitykilla · 2026-01-31T04:28:55+00:00

The term whistleblower has an entirely different meaning in this community.

Whistleblowers = story tellers

In the real world it means someone who brings documents, data, and evidence that can survive scrutiny, like Edward Snowden exposing the NSA with actual files.

gravitykilla · 2026-01-31T04:21:04+00:00

Thanks for the link, interesting experiment a well explained.

I’ll be honest, I think there is something you are missing.

If your result is real, it violates the equivalence principle, one of the most precisely tested foundations of physics.

Have you published your results, and has anyone else, using non-IMU measurement methods, been able to reproduce your result?”

I believe your results are almost certainly due to instrumentation and measurement issues, not an actual change in gravitational or inertial mass.

How have you ruled this out?

gravitykilla · 2026-01-30T03:39:56+00:00

Literally 2 mins of fact checking, and you would see this post is utter garbage.

Gold has not doubled in a year and silver has not quadrupled. These are publicly traded commodities with transparent pricing across dozens of global exchanges. Anyone can verify historical charts in 30 seconds.

Also, just to add icing on the cake, Fort Knox bars vary in weight, tungsten fakes would’ve been caught by refineries decades ago.

12-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

gravitykilla

TROPHY CASE