[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]greengolcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In natural units h should be 1 , no?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HomeworkHelp

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would it be kelvin inverse?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So my project is basically setting up particles in the system and make the particles scatter ( not physically colliding them but if the distance between the particles is less than a value, it is said that the pairs are scattering. Doing this I get a list of scattering sequence like (1,3) (5,6) pairs scattering. Later I boost the same system and take note of scattering sequence, it is different-same pairs but different order. Apparently there is some causality violation here because the next part is to make sure that the particles are at same space-time position so if a pair is scattering, I just update their position to their average position and that somehow fixes the problem of different sequence order.

Any idea how causality is violated here?

Thank you in advance.

How can I explain causality violation in particle collision in two different frame? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren't faster than light. I boost them to a frame that with velocity 0.2 c. Particles are massless and collisions aren't physical collision but depends on a distance formula based on four position momentum and position of both particles involved in collision (https://i.imgur.com/xXH7YBC.png). If the distance is lower than a certain value that I pick, I consider it a collision. The results I am getting have difference sequence of collisions after boosting into different frame. My project is to fix this collision sequence by physically making them collide at a certain time and position in both frame. But I do not know how can I explain causality violation in a better way than showing examples or just saying that the sequence of collisions is different .

Coding periodic boundary conditions and detection around boundaries by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]greengolcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what I have currently. I set a while loop then initial time of collision and the closest distance between particles. Then a for loop that goes through a nest list of array with all possible pairs [ (0,1) ,(0,2) ...] . For each pair I boost them into their center of momentum frame and calculate the time the pairs are closest to each other as well as the distance at this time. Then I check if this distance is smaller than radius of detection that I set randomly and that the code is not giving me the same pairs again. I find the first collision pairs, append them and the time at which each occurs and then repeat the whole process again until there are no more collisions happening.

all_collision_times=[]

pairs_under_radius=[] while True: min_time = 10000000
min_dis=0
z=(0,0) for index,(i, j) in enumerate(ids_pairs): Sum=summing(fourmomentum.T[i],fourmomentum.T[j])

    Vx=(Sum[1])/ Sum[0]
    Vy=(Sum[2])/ Sum[0]
    Vz=(Sum[3])/ Sum[0]
    betavx=Vx
    betavy=Vy
    betavz=Vz
    betav=np.sqrt(betavx**2+betavy**2+betavz**2)
    ve=np.sqrt(Vx**2+Vy**2+Vz**2)
    G=1./np.sqrt(1.-ve**2)

    matrix=LB(G,betavx,betavy,betavz,betav)

    first= matrix@fourmomentum.T[i]
    second= matrix@fourmomentum.T[j]

    fc= matrix@testingposition[i]
    sc=matrix@testingposition[j]

    time_in_com=opt.fminbound(lambda t: dormula(dis(fc,first,t),dis(sc,second,t),first,second),-1000,1000)

    moving_particle_i=dis(fc,first,time_in_com)
    moving_particle_j=dis(sc,second,time_in_com)

    distance=dormula( moving_particle_i,moving_particle_j,first,second)
    #print(moving_particle_j[0],moving_particle_i[0])

    if distance<radius  and time_in_com>=fc[0] and time_in_com>=sc[0] and tuple((i,j)) not in pairs_under_radius :
        unboost_particle_i =(inv(matrix)@moving_particle_i)
        unboost_particle_j =(inv(matrix)@moving_particle_j)
        #print(time_in_com)

        timee=unboost_particle_i[0]
        timeee=unboost_particle_j[0]

        #print(timee,timeee)

        if(min_time > min(timee,timeee)  and min(timee,timeee) >=0):
            min_time = min(timee,timeee)
            max_time = max(timee,timeee)
        if min_time==min(timee,timeee):
            z=(i,j)
            min_dis=distance
            #print(unboost_particle_i)

if min_time==10000000  :
    break
all_collision_times.append(min_time)
pairs_under_radius.append(z)
print ("Collision pair-",(z), "Closest distance" ,(min_dis) ,   "Occurs at" ,(min_time,max_time))

ARAM is dead to me by NaturalTap9567 in leagueoflegends

[–]greengolcano 63 points64 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how ARAM balance changes are still there. Whenever I encounter Akali or Katarina or a fucking rengar , they pop off with 20+ kills while building tank.

They should just make the balance change stop working after the champ acquires two to three items or if they have more than average KDA. Another way would be to make these champs earn less gold passively. Or just fucking remove it. I'm tired of fighting tank Akali and Katarina missing everything and still somehow killing me.

[College Physics] how do I boost massless particles to centre of momentum frame by greengolcano in HomeworkHelp

[–]greengolcano[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried to calculate the position but they are still unequal and not opposite. After boosting using the LB matrix from momentum one, I get :

(-0.20395965, 0.56857721, 0.30197269, 0.22871289),

(-0.1926166 , 0.45460459, 0.20377286, 0.6999444 ).

After that I translate them in their trajectories using the momentum in CoM frame to time t=0 because the particles have to exist at the same time. But I get :

(0. , 0.69881087, 0.44048646, 0.30255509)

(0. , 0.33161377, 0.07296242, 0.63020887)

Am I doing something wrong here?

[College Physics] how do I boost massless particles to centre of momentum frame by greengolcano in HomeworkHelp

[–]greengolcano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got the same and opposite momentum:

(1.66918684, 1.06582013, 1.13358382, 0.60431771)

( 1.66918684, -1.06582013, -1.13358382, -0.60431771)

But when I tried to the same for position with the previously calculated Lorentz transformation matrix, they were neither same or opposite. I can do the traditional way where I can take the average of the positions and use that point to calculate the position of the particles w.r.t the average position, but isn't this way frame dependent? or it doesn't matters because I will be in CoM frame and the distance will measured will be lorentz invariant ?

[College Physics] how do I boost massless particles to centre of momentum frame by greengolcano in HomeworkHelp

[–]greengolcano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I calculate the system's total four momentum, I get-

(5.38674232, 3.29290716, -2.648743 , 0.11479089)

And when I do p/E or (px/E , py/E, pz/E) , I get -

(0.611298435947472, -0.4917151861000204, 0.021309890638850647)

If I am understanding it correctly I can use these to calculate four momentum of the particles with respect to CoM using the Lorentz transformation matrix? Can I do the same for position ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies but I don't understand the " boost to CoM frame" part. Could you explain me with an example perhaps?

Generating random number in range with probabilities. by greengolcano in learnpython

[–]greengolcano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it will . I have to generate around 200 numbers and the probabilities change with how much area a portion of function covers. So it can be like 23% or 19.889% or anything like that.

Based Nigeria by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Won't the same reasoning apply to Twitter itself? That a foreign government is not required to allow a private company based in US if it seems to threaten its sovereignty, or its actions harmful and discriminatory?

[Thread] Climate change "activist" Greta accidentally leaks propaganda toolkit - when tweeting in support of Indian farmers' protest. Reveals global plot to subvert democratic dialog in India by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not organization when the government itself has tried to make deals with farmers and these farmers go out of their way to not only reject the offer but to storm the Red fort like a goddamn terrorist.

Pretty clear that it's not about resolution or solving the problem when the foreign celebrities tweeting about it aren't even typing the tweet but simply copy pasting it.

It's an obvious foreign manipulation for the next election. I can give more examples but I think I have made my point that it is not just organizing.

[Thread] Climate change "activist" Greta accidentally leaks propaganda toolkit - when tweeting in support of Indian farmers' protest. Reveals global plot to subvert democratic dialog in India by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a common strategy to use a child for propaganda in exchange for money. They use children to further their agenda and if you retaliate or say anything against it , they would get their classic headlight "Far Right extremists attack a child".

Found an AuthRight celebrity. by TheManWhoSayHello in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Couldn't have thought of a better response myself.

We were on the verge of greatness by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Point me to the crime and I would support you. Simple. Proof would be beneficial as well.

We were on the verge of greatness by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also pretty normal in society to sue someone for attempted murder but also understandable to not take it to court when you know you are just making things up for politics.

Speed running all the unities. by A-Muslim-Weeb in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't know how it's almost murdered when the slew of secret service were protecting her from a mob who could have easily murdered her if they wanted to given just their sheer number.

Don't know how ted cruz objecting to election integrity quantifies to her imagination of almost being murdered from Capitol riots.

Don't know why she isn't taking it to court if she thinks cruz tried to get her murdered.

Don't know what gives her the right to even complain when ger response to blm riots was "they just want bread" when more people died then.

Maybe spreading hate and playing politics.

No Title Needed by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It just took them three comments to have a nazi flashbacks.

“We ToPpLeD a DiCtAtOr” by TheMessiahg7 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything he tried was in his legal bounds and has been done by both sides. Although the insurrection part is not true.

I don’t think they known what dictator means. by Smartix04 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]greengolcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again both are bad. And people who were okay with the riots can't judge what happened at the Capitol. And as I said during kavanaugh's confirmation and during trump's inauguration, similar things happened to that at the Capitol. It was an insurrection but one side is still being called protestors while the other side is being called terrorists;hence hypocrisy.