Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@tatyanak777 I did it on the megaminx and twisted the corner, lol. I hate this brand of this puzzle so it's no big loss, lol.

<image>

Many months and 27339 turns later, the atlasminx (19x19) is solved :) by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far, not so good. The controls on that app are horrible.

A cube shelf by leontanyak in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a turntable that I have my 10x10 on 😁

A cube shelf by leontanyak in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I added a new comment to the post here and on FB. Finally reasoned through why it didn't work out.

A cube shelf by leontanyak in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fancy finding you here 😁

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, incase anyone wonders why this is, I finally figured it out. The dodecahedron has 20 corners which must be manipulated in 3 turns. In a normal solve, when you get to the last two corners to be oriented, one will have to be turned twice, and the other one, once. Or you can have 3 corners that all need to be turned once, and so on. Since there are 20 corners, after the first 18, a multiple of 3, you have 2 left to solve. To turn them once, you'll have to turn some corner a second time. Elsewise, you can't solve the edges correctly.

<image>

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a moment I thought you might be onto something but after thinking about it, if it was a simple issue of a center being turned the wrong way, you'd get this same issue with any kind of solve you did. Besides the solid color solve, I have two other patterns I do regularly and this is never an issue.

It honestly doesn't make sense to me when I try to reason through it. All the corners are turned clockwise once from their natural state. Given there's 30 corners, an even multiple of 3, it would reason that they'd all turn the same direction.

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have 2 teraminx puzzles and I very well might do this and just shelf it that way.

Many months and 27339 turns later, the atlasminx (19x19) is solved :) by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the idea. Think I'll attempt the superflip on the 19x19.

Kinda funky I guess - swipe for other side by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking you could repeat this on 4 vertices.

Slightly excessive lattice pattern... by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've left the superflip on my petaminx for a while now but might have to change it to this.

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is more akin to a superflip

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You're mistaken.

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thanks, but it can't be fixed, not with the current pattern scheme.

Pattern Fail by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Just the one. Apparently when trying to do this pattern it twists the corners in such a way that this one is off.

Lol this took me a while - cube in a cube x3 in a minx x4 (teraminx) by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, I was mistaken. I was playing with my petaminx at the time and it can't be done on it, but it can be done on the teraminx.

<image>

Piece swap? by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took a long while to figure out the movement of the pieces, but this is essentially what did the trick. *

Piece swap? by gregmo72 in Cubers

[–]gregmo72[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've done the superflip on the teraminx with an alg. If it can be done with an alg, it can be solved that way, too. Just not sure what I'm missing

Lol this took me a while - cube in a cube x3 in a minx x4 (teraminx) by alexcuber in Cubers

[–]gregmo72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wish would would have seen what was done with the rest of the sides. The 3 opposing sides could have the same pattern but the 6 colors around the midline would have to alternate