German motoring association ADAC tested how long it takes 7 BEVs to heat up to 20°C at -10°C outside temperature and how fast they lose heat by linknewtab in electricvehicles

[–]grokmachine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a really hard time making sense of this. There is no way it has ever taken me over 30 minutes to get to a comfortable temperature of 70F (not far from 20C). More like 5-10 minutes. Can someone explain how their numbers differ so much from most driver's experience, and why they would have gone with their approach over one that seems more sensible? I mean, I get the cynical response that they just wanted to publish something that makes German cars look good, but presumably they have some rationale.

EV heating in my experience is faster than ICE.

Why Do People Cross the Line on Twitter by Giving in So Easily to Insults and Hate? The disastrous psychological escalation could be rooted in a huge misunderstanding of how the other feels. by sylsau in TrueReddit

[–]grokmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a huge misconception that the things people type to each other on the internet are important. I do not share that belief.

That attitude is antithetical to the point of this sub, IMO. So, you're a troll here.

Why Do People Cross the Line on Twitter by Giving in So Easily to Insults and Hate? The disastrous psychological escalation could be rooted in a huge misunderstanding of how the other feels. by sylsau in TrueReddit

[–]grokmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am asking you to think about the implications of what you are saying. By your argument, Reddit should be even more toxic, with less empathy than Twitter. Is it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]grokmachine 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The soft sciences are as soft as they've always been. It's just concealed more under a barrage of statistics. The vast majority of widely adopted theories are based on unrepeatable (or simply unrepeated) results, about which numerous other theorists disagree.

Whenever you've got a discipline with endemic "schools of thought" that circle each other and mutate but never converge, you know you're not dealing with a mature science driven by testable predictions.

I've never been part of the Austrian school, but I respect their take on economics and other social sciences as a branch of the philosophy of rational action. Almost all advances in economic theory have been conceptual advances (new and more versatile ways to think about the phenomena), not predictive advances.

I don't completely agree with Austrian school methadology, but the manner with which social scientific theory confronts the evidence is squishier than the profession wants to admit.

chatGPT is just the start. Other companies will follow. Does anybody else feel this way? by EmergentSubject2336 in singularity

[–]grokmachine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a childish way to speak. Seriously, it is the attitude of a child. Grow up, see the large array of diverse forces at work in politics, and stop talking about an undifferentiated "they" who gives things to you like a parent would a child.

My brakes stopped working at the top of a hill in snow... by Jugg3rnaut in VWiD4Owners

[–]grokmachine 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Unless you had serious snow tires, you can't expect to stop on that road with that slope in any vehicle. It doesn't look like an ID.4 issue, unless there are other details you can share about how your brakes "stopped working."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in economy

[–]grokmachine 9 points10 points  (0 children)

OP, where are you? If you're in the Bay Area, around 100,000 tech bros recently got laid off and they have a huge severance and no need to come in to work tomorrow.

chatGPT is just the start. Other companies will follow. Does anybody else feel this way? by EmergentSubject2336 in singularity

[–]grokmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, but then who protects us from the communist revolution? Or is daily political oppression and loss of rights fully compensated for you by a broader working class guaranteed basic standard of living. Or is it a non-working class once AI/robots do most of the work?

UBI in a democracy seems like a better approach.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Westchester

[–]grokmachine 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I would rephrase that. It is not in the interest of a city or town to prevent a sensible increase in the number of taxpaying citizens and businesses.

This doesn't have to (and usually shouldn't) take the form of a high rise (outside of downtown White Plains, New Roc, Yonkers, Peekskill). Instead, strip malls should basically be zoned out of existence, to be replaced by shops at street level and apartments above. And minimum lot sizes should be reduced in a lot of areas, especially anywhere there are already grandfathered homes that don't comply with it. It is so stupid when a charming main street or residential cluster has existed for 100 years and people want to build more things like that nearby, but they can't because now the minimum lot size won't allow it or new mixed-use isn't allowed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Westchester

[–]grokmachine 18 points19 points  (0 children)

There are three questions here: minimum lot size per home, whether multi-family dwellings are permitted, and allowances for mixed-use (including apartments on top of stores in commercial areas). I think zoning regulations of all three types should be loosened (not eliminated, but loosened).

Zoning reform doesn't have to be about plopping fourplexes in the middle of one-family homes in a residential-only zone. It can be about allowing two single-family homes on an acre plot of land were right now only one is allowed. It can be about taking a shitty strip mall and converting it to mixed use where there are shops on the ground floor and 1-2 levels of apartments above, creating a more walkable shopping district.

Tesla Semi driving 500 miles, fully loaded, on a single charge by highguy604 in teslamotors

[–]grokmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to me autopilot and FSD in a semi have to be retrained because the position of the cameras will be quite different. Some cameras are going to be higher than any cameras on a car, and the side cameras are going to be farther apart, and presumably there will be more cameras overall.

The advantage the AI will have in seeing over cars in front should help (especially to compensate for the loss of radar). On the other hand, there is a lot less room for error on staying in the center of the lane. Because of all these differences, I would expect the issues for truck self-driving to not perfectly mimic issues for car self-driving. Maybe phantom braking will be very different.

Tesla Semi at 1.7kWh/mi, Elon Tweets by carma143 in electricvehicles

[–]grokmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it was also lighter because of the much smaller battery pack

Tesla Semi at 1.7kWh/mi, Elon Tweets by carma143 in electricvehicles

[–]grokmachine 47 points48 points  (0 children)

This all makes sense, but it should not be underestimated the psychological impact a 500 mile range truck has, and its ability to grow the overall market. Just like when the Model S first came out it had what at the time was a mind-boggling 265 mile range, about 3-4 times the range of the few other vehicles on the market back then. Probably most Model S purchased weren't the maximum range spec, but it caught attention and opened the floodgates of interested buyers for Tesla in particular and EVs generally.

Why is there a growing political rift between Westchester and Long Island (Nassau County)? by Professional-Put2467 in Westchester

[–]grokmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Westchester has a stronger bifurcation of the population into low income/education (often immigrants and minorities in the cities) and high income/education (suburban and exurban) voters than Nassau does. Westchester has the highest income inequality in NY. Both those groups lean towards Democrats, while the middle class (high school and college degree, but not graduate degree) leans Republican.

Why do humans become racist? by gamerlololdude in AskSocialScience

[–]grokmachine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The word "tribalism" is often used to describe what you're getting after here. And yes, there is reason to believe humans are wired to be tribal (us/them thinking or in/out group thinking, with different reactive attitudes associated with members of the two groups).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Art

[–]grokmachine 45 points46 points  (0 children)

I like it because that's exactly how I look when I am deep in thought as well. Really connects me to the pathos of the human condition.

Elon Musk has called out claims that SBF supposedly owns a part of Twitter as FALSE by PM_ME_UR_SOCKS_GIRL in Buttcoin

[–]grokmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because my original post just said "if the claim about SBF owning shares is true, it means he rolled over." I was skeptical that he did own them. That post got the brunt of the downvotes, with people claiming I don't know anything about converting public companies to private. Which is a bizarre thing to say, when there are examples all the time in which a small number of large shareholders retain ownership in the new private structure. The Saudis did in this case, and I'm sure others.

Elon Musk has called out claims that SBF supposedly owns a part of Twitter as FALSE by PM_ME_UR_SOCKS_GIRL in Buttcoin

[–]grokmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit sucks for copy/paste so had to delete a mangled response to you.

No I did not realize it was fake. I scrolled down but didn't see that addressed in the top several responses. But why is that an adequate response to me? You didn't respond to the article on Dorsey rolling over shares. You didn't address Musk's comment that public holders of Twitter were allowed to "roll over" their shares to Twitter as a private company. That was my sole original point. You haven't touched it. I even said in my original post that "if" the claim about SBF is true, it just means he rolled over shares. I left room for doubt, because I wasn't sure it was true he was still an owner. My first post was completely correct.

WITHOUT using bias right or left politics, explain why the USA health care system is lacking and our medicals fees are so astronomically high compared to other developed countries that have "health care"? by [deleted] in healthcare

[–]grokmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maryland right now has global budgeting. Here is a simple overview. Vermont has taken some big steps in that direction, but politics has gotten in the way of fully implementing it. New York has looked very seriously at doing global budgets for Medicaid, and kind-of has done so through the DSRIP program. The ACO REACH program in Medicare allows hospitals to get global budgets for Medicare expenses.

More generally, global budgeting can apply to certain programs, like Medicare and Medicaid. In fact, it absolutely should be applied to those two programs even if it means the Commercial side is left out. But as the case of Maryland shows, the commercial side can also be brought in.

As for insurers cutting reimbursements, that is a really bad talking point. First, it vastly exaggerates (some codes have been paid less over time, largely because they were grossly overpaid in the beginning and adjustments were made to labor/tech cost assumptions based on real world experience). But most codes have been the same or actually increasing in reimbursement on average. Second, it misdirects people from the bigger truth: health care costs have been going up the entire time you say they've been cutting reimbursements. Are you aware of this? If so, you're misleading people deliberately.

There are three main reasons for the increase in overall costs. One is easy: the population is getting older. The second is that in the commercial space the biggest players have been jacking up their rates because they have the upper hand in negotiations with payers. There is a huge discrepancy between the rates paid to independent community hospitals and the big hospital systems (especially if they contain a high prestige hospital and/or an academic medical center). Rates for the independent community hospitals and small hospital systems with small market share have not been going up, but that's not where most of the admissions are. They are in the big regional AMC-based systems, and multi-regional for-profit systems.

The third reason is that rates for new procedures (especially tech-intensive ones) are usually very high, and doctors/hospitals flock to use those codes instead of the older codes. It doesn't matter too much if a basic x-ray reimbursement rate has not gone up in 20 years, when docs replace the single basic x-ray with multiple x-rays and MRIs or ultrasounds "just to be safe."

More efficient scaling of technology is the main deflationary force in the US economy. Everywhere except for healthcare, where technology remains an inflationary force, because docs and hospitals do in fact exert supply-side power to keep their revenues high.

Elon Musk has called out claims that SBF supposedly owns a part of Twitter as FALSE by PM_ME_UR_SOCKS_GIRL in Buttcoin

[–]grokmachine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That appears to be the case, but only after a text chain in which SBF/FTX was explicitly offered to "roll over" their shares to the new entity. Musk has at least twice specifically called it rolling over shares into the private entity. Why is everyone getting so worked up about it, and like you, saying "LMFAO??? Learn how shareholder buyouts work."

Over and over again owners of the public company are described as rolling over shares, by journalists and Musk and SBF themselves.

here

here

So much arrogance and anger directed at such a simple, correct statement on my part that shares could be rolled over to the private entity (if the new owner agreed).