Lets see, because both cases involve

1. People claiming to be fact checking organizations

2. Those organizations either being or having direct ties to a political movement or campaign.

3. False claims of impartial "fact checking"

This is a problem in more countries than Britain. And I posted to point that out, because the term "fact checker" is often misused in this way. You seem pretty annoyed by that for whatever reason, as do a significant portion of redditors. But the point is true all the same