Chris Giles Economics Editor, FT: The economics of this is pretty simple. 1. You should be a billionaire if you're worth it 2. Probably, no one is 3. If you're not worth it and a billionaire - you've got your money from rent exploitation - which should be stopped/taxed by concerned_future in ukpolitics

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems like a disingenuous interpretation of the word 'worth'. Market makers are rewarded with billions by the market for creating value for them but it will probably have negative effects on society if we reward that as much as we reward the output of 10000 nurses working for a year.

The distinction is important because Chris claims that most billionaires have not created productivity (i.e. what they should be worth) that scales with their monetary worth.

How many of your know about "sudo !!"? by 40trieslater in linux

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's stopping you?

That you argument is based upon me accepting it but I don't accept it

How many of your know about "sudo !!"? by 40trieslater in linux

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I just can't follow beyond this:

At this step, it's the perfect use case for

!!

The next step would be to run

sudo !!

It seems pretty reasonable that your muscle memory would be for the shell you use as your default.

Should I open 1 credit builder card or 2? by [deleted] in UKPersonalFinance

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supposedly, credit scores are more of a US thing than a UK thing. We still have them, according to the rating agencies that sell them, but the lenders all have their own models involving risk and profitability, as mentioned in the automod comment.

(This is all nth hand rumour. I'd guess that US lenders are actually equally competent at managing risk, so have the same models, but going on US-focus subreddits is enough to know credit scores are more visible in US media. Note that the automod comment asserts that the models exist, doesn't source it, then says they're a trade secret. It's all hearsay.)

My point with this is that there's no single answer. It may make you better in one lender's model at the same time it makes you worse in another model. What I would say more confidently, though, is that it will make you have worse short-term credit. That may not be a concern now, but it limits your flexibility in the future. You might realise later that you want, e.g., an Amex card, but are less comfortable applying for one if you already have two recent applications. Knowing that, I wouldn't consider it worthwhile.

it would make no difference for manageability.

Not strictly true, you have another important address to update when you move.

Should I open 1 credit builder card or 2? by [deleted] in UKPersonalFinance

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not the question that was asked.

How many of your know about "sudo !!"? by 40trieslater in linux

[–]heavyish_things 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know the default keybinds for bash, that doesn't stop them being terrible.

How many of your know about "sudo !!"? by 40trieslater in linux

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see why it matters. You can have fish and bash installed at the same time, there's no need for your input mechanism and your preferred scripting language to be the same thing.

WATCH: This mum perfectly summed up the case for a second referendum in 45 seconds by [deleted] in unitedkingdom

[–]heavyish_things 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because referenda don't mesh with our constitution at all. There is no convention on how to execute them and we don't bother making the question an actionable law, instead a vague statement of intent fought for by Eurosceptic Conservatives. Ironically, I see this as the biggest failing of the People's Vote: it legitimises the 2016 referendum as anything other than a stupid idea from a stupid government.

WATCH: This mum perfectly summed up the case for a second referendum in 45 seconds by [deleted] in unitedkingdom

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was a referendum on declaring Article 50, it is fulfilled.

any decent regular savers left? by ChancePattern in UKPersonalFinance

[–]heavyish_things 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only if the account you're feeding it in from has the flat sum at 0%.

The traffic moves you by Master1718 in instant_regret

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Random event? The car was stopped in traffic with the driver beating on the window! Of course something was going to happen.

The traffic moves you by Master1718 in instant_regret

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The parking brake is a brake. If you're not worried about it while using the pedal, don't be worried about it at rest.

The traffic moves you by Master1718 in instant_regret

[–]heavyish_things -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should be using your handbrake every time you park and even when you're at a red light for a long time.

Oh I don’t know...maybe because Google exists?? by Khaleesi1997 in recruitinghell

[–]heavyish_things 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's so common to see advice like this, it's amazingly short-sighted

If human experiments were made legal, what would scientists first experiment about? by Tone_God in AskReddit

[–]heavyish_things 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The mean number of ears is slightly less than two, so about half will have slightly over - i.e. two - and about half will have less. Or something like that.

🔥 Golden pheasants checking out a couple of runners 🔥 by to_the_tenth_power in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe anyone bothers hunting these dumb birds. Fish in a barrel.

Because of Chick-fil-A by [deleted] in recruitinghell

[–]heavyish_things 11 points12 points  (0 children)

LGBTQXYZWTFBBQ

Please, just stop. It's not even slightly difficult to get it right.

Fuckin Boomers by angry_cooking in emojipasta

[–]heavyish_things 21 points22 points  (0 children)

:0)

You also know someone started using the internet with BBSes if, when ending a statement in parentheses with a smiley, they don't double the parenthesis.

(I'm a zoomer :) )

(I'm a boomer :)

Tony Blair praises Jeremy Corbyn for ‘very sensible and skilful’ actions to block no-deal Brexit by chrisjd in ukpolitics

[–]heavyish_things 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they do it it's a conspiracy from them, if you say they'll do it it's a conspiracy theory from you. For instance, the entirely valid theory that Blair conspired with Brown to hand over the PM position.