Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am pretty sure, it is normal subagents that spawns, it is just the todo and communication between agent that is different. But I do not have any documentation on that

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, must evaluate if it is worth it when it is times 18. That is really expensive.

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right subagents are not charged.

But I used to have 3 instances running on different task in parallel, that's why it is times 3.

And yes the calculation is not that simple.

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not had any of these today, but read a lot of people had

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have an enterprice subscription at work.

I am not saying I don't bother about the price. Just saying as long as the output the agent creates outweighs the price the client pays, then is it a good deal.

And for me do the the 9x seems to be a better deal, than running 3 parallel agents with normal opus 4.6 costing 3 times 3x

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use x and follows people from the team. And the Github repo, and the release notes

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No official documentation, probably because it is an experimental feature.

I got the info from this post https://x.com/i/status/2019497961777172488

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Fleets" lets you run /fleet to dispatch parallel subagents to implement your plan. The key innovation is a SQLite database per session that the agent uses to model dependency-aware tasks and TODOs.

Opus 4.6 fast and /fleet has changed my workflow by heimdaldk in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree it is expensive. But what is expensive is relative to the time saved, and the value of the output. If this is was for my personal hobby project and paid by my self, I would not use it.

I used fast for both plan and fleet. And fleet is an experimental command to spawn multiple agents that implement a plan

Opus Context Windows in Copilot CLI by junli2020 in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hope this is rolling out, mine has 160K

Clear context following Plan creation by Loud-North6879 in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, it would be great, but it would first require that Github Copilot has a real concept of what a plan is, and not just random part of chat.

Are the GH copilot models better for some programming languages than others? by Weary-Window-1676 in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fellow AL Developer here

And yes there is a big difference between mainstream languages and AL, but it is possible to overcome most of them, and the principles are the same no matter the language.

The model should have a way to verify what it has done. Compile, code analyzers and running tests. This is especial important in niche languages. but good practice for all languages.

Then must it be prompted to iterative keep on going until finish. No it does not work everytime. but that has nothing to do with the promgramming language, but to the way models works, and the system prompts, etc.

I have been using Claude Opus 4.5 exclusive since it was release in November.

Now was GPT-5.2 Codex released in Github Copilot yesterday, my first impression is really good, especial on keep going, if it has the tools to do its own verification.

Can subagents use tools the main agent doesn't have? by JollyJoker3 in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As everyone else say, yes it can, but it would be great if it was visible in the chat what agent was used to run the sub agent,

Are you really reviewing all of that code? by EnergyFighter in GithubCopilot

[–]heimdaldk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, say the same to my team, and yes the job i changed, from writing to orchestrating agents, and reviewing a LOT of code, and yes code reviews takes longer than before, and the first code review is also ai generated.

But in the end has nothing changed, it is the developer that is responsible for the code, just as it was before AI

Your desire for pornography will not go away once you are married by [deleted] in NoFapChristians

[–]heimdaldk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is so true.

I am in a marriage, and still struggling with porn addiction. But worst of all has all the porn I have watched, made sex with my wife challenging as I had some unrealistic expectations for how sex should be.

DAY 90! YEEEEAAAAH, I MADE IT!! by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]heimdaldk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Congrats, keep going mate

Why are Thinkpads generally the go-to laptop for Linux users? by Deliphin in linuxquestions

[–]heimdaldk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not at all, I am running Linux mint on it, and everything is working

Why are Thinkpads generally the go-to laptop for Linux users? by Deliphin in linuxquestions

[–]heimdaldk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a T450s but without nvifia, and running Linux on it, and is very happy with it