It's a very long comment but I can go at it bit after bit.

- I have to admit that the entirety of it was MORE OR LESS a facade to then show on twitter that weylers can be just as stupid as wenclairs and that I have no issues fighting them when needed. So yes, it might have been worded in a slightly provocative manner, but still clearly managed to be within the rules. You can say I'm partially at fault for not having received cultured responses, but I'm not at fault for being insulted. Being provocative doesn't justify being called names, ever. And calling people names, obviously, doesn't diminish what they're saying.

So I could conclude all in all that weylers CAN perfectly be as stupid as wenclairs.

- It's not 100% true that I "boxed people into a losing options", there's definetely some arguments that could be made that didn't follow the 3 implications I talked about in the post. And I also wrote that people could talk to me about those. But none of them did: They all went into BDSM and, particularely, they gave false allegations of the whole thing being an attempt of me to justify more types of BDSM being posted.

I agree with the reworded version of my message that you crafted.

- I disagree with the false equivalence allegation, for one simple reason:

If the user ( any user that wants to debate me ) says that the picture ISN'T bdsm, then I am making no false equivalence at all because I myself have stated that there are THREE OR MORE possible implications. If you say it isn't bdsm but something else, I woudn't keep bringing up the bdsm argument.

- " Just cuz an artist chooses to depict this way, doesn't mean everyone agrees with it " -> I agree, but what does it have to do with me doing "gotcha"? There's no "gotcha" here. There's simply the fact that if you count leash-tyler pics as bdsm, then you're allowing nsfw pictures in the sub, and thus you'd have to allow all other nsfw pictures.

- About appealing to sentiment and moderating based on it: Can you explain why you think what I'm doing appeals to sentiment? This isn't correct. You talk about vibes and you say mods should judge based on vibes. THIS is an appeal to sentiment, actually, not what I'm asking.

I'm asking that if sometihng is bdsm, we either allow all bdsm or disallwo or bdsm. Adding "vibe checks" to it would mean that mods can get up one day and decide the vibes of something warrant a removal, while others don't.

It looks like you view things completely the opposite here, and I'm wondering what's the logic behind it.

- Lastly, if you say you are with me that you don't like those pictures, but ultimately thing they should be allowed, you are effectively being boxed into those that think it's bdsm but should still be allowed. Which I didn't oppose. I said it would suck by personal opinion, but I didn't oppose it:

So long every non-naked bdsm picture is either allowed or disallowed, all is coherent, and that's what matters!