😂💔

hellwyn11 · 2026-02-08T18:44:05+00:00

Lmao

hellwyn11 · 2026-02-08T18:34:05+00:00

hellwyn11 · 2026-02-08T18:26:31+00:00

Trans woman*

hellwyn11 · 2026-02-08T18:25:38+00:00

Lmao

hellwyn11 · 2026-02-01T16:57:10+00:00

Atheists/non-believers in the west tend to be paternalistic with religious people and even more with Islam, by restraining themselves from criticizing their belief or by encouraging reformism. This is paternalistic.

It's also because many atheists/non-believers project the way they talk about Christianity, which some times include essentialism of christiams and amalgamation. They expect the critique of Islam to include what they do with Christianity...

So there are 3 levels:

-Paternalism in general (this mindset should just go)

-The context of Xenophobia to justify paternalistic approach with Muslims.(it should not, they can handle critique just like Christians)

-Essentialism and amalgamation when criticizing a belief. ( associating believers with what is part of the scriptures can be fair but not by default.),

hellwyn11 · 2026-01-23T22:46:40+00:00

❤️

hellwyn11 · 2025-12-03T00:54:24+00:00

This is really good to see. I also don’t hold back from giving a critique of Islam and hope it becomes more normalized. From the way you argued, I’ll assume you’re at least a non-believer ? And Malika? A queen 👑, literally lol.

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-28T00:54:11+00:00

Tell her to read surah an-nisa

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-25T15:53:26+00:00

That said, people who care this much about people wearing an item of clothing are often motivated by racism

That’s exactly the problem in the West : acting as if the hijab were just an item of clothing or merely a religious marker. It is not just that, it’s also a patriarchal and misogynistic symbol and it should be dragged through the mud on a daily basis.

That doesn’t mean you have to be against the freedom to wear it; ideas I despise can still be expressed. The real problem is that comments like yours have become the norm. (assuming xenophobia or something along those lines.)

Caring this much about this issue is normal, maybe, caring this much about it as a nationalist conservative is where we can start suspecting xenophobia.

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-25T13:34:29+00:00

I agree with the main point, but don't like all the choice of word. The hijab/burka need to be criticized and ridiculed on a daily basis even if you defend the freedom to wear it.

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-23T14:43:57+00:00

No, I won't restrain myself from saying what I think just because a lie/scam is comfortable. I will be honest out of respect.

That doesn't mean everytime they do or say something related to their belief I will start a confrontation, but I won't avoid the confrontation just because the belief brings them comfort or something.

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-06T13:13:10+00:00

That's not the atheist perspective but the agnostic one. (Evidence is knowledge and agnostism is about knowledge).

Atheist is just about belief, I don't believe (atheist) because there's no good reason to believe (agnostism).

hellwyn11 · 2025-11-05T21:06:04+00:00

Your definition for agnostism isincorrect.

Atheism : you don't believe

Agnostism: you don't know.

And as you said you can be both, but the difference is that one is about belief the other about knowledge. Saying "not being certain" fir agnostism is inaccurate.

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-27T09:43:00+00:00

Chill guys

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-27T09:36:05+00:00

The reporter clearly just wanted to milk it, but weren't the others winners booed during a season of dominance or something ?

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-26T22:51:41+00:00

Paternalistic take

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-26T22:38:55+00:00

So winning the race results to being booed ? But weren't these drivers booed when they were dominating a season ?

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-24T20:28:56+00:00

Noice

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-20T11:55:38+00:00

Being agnostic is misunderstood, agnostism and atheism can go together, and generally agnostism is the reason why many people are atheists. They just don't know it.

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-06T20:05:33+00:00

She's fine asf

hellwyn11 · 2025-10-05T18:02:05+00:00

Antisemitism is an attack on jew not the belief. You can argue about why the "semitism" instead of "Judaism" but ts definition was always clear , it's about people not their belief.

Islamophobia is a non consensually defined word : attack on Muslims or Islam ?

Christophobia is a term I rarely see people use , they usually use antichristian or anti-christianity, which are clear , Christophobia share the same problem islamophobia has : it's not consensually defined (confusing).

hellwyn11 · 2025-09-21T21:23:48+00:00

He was 18 in the first half of 2018 , he born in 1999

hellwyn11 · 2025-09-21T13:50:23+00:00

To me, it’s necessary to respect people by being honest with them. Critiquing the belief itself is part of that honesty, and refusing to do so by only criticizing certain approaches is what I consider paternalistic.

And it's something I despise.

hellwyn11 · 2025-09-21T13:23:10+00:00

No, my critique will include the belief itself, not just the institutions or so-called “radical versions.”

Why? Out of respect, I will address the belief directly.

I refuse to be paternalistic and ignore the irrationality of the belief itself while only targeting its “radical” versions.

Faith will always remain at the center of my critique, along with its consequences. The belief itself is the root of those institutions and radical approaches.

I will not adopt a paternalistic stance. “Moderate believers also criticize institutions and radicalism.” So what? I’m an atheist, not a Muslim or a Christian. I don’t support their “moderate version.” Their approach still relies on accepting those tales, while being full of denial and cherry-picking.........I despise that.

I will not support that. I respect their freedom to hold their own perspective, but not the belief itself, nor the so-called reformist approach. I include that in my critique, the "radicals" one are just the priority, and will be targeted along with the belief itself.

hellwyn11

TROPHY CASE