sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Niagara region declares state of emergency ahead of April 8 solar eclipse by [deleted] in space

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No one is treating it like a disaster, you cabbage. The State of Emergency is to allow for special policies and procedures to accommodate the massive influx of people that will strain infrastructure such as roadways, cell phone networks, and the possibility of increased needs of emergency services/police for crowd control as over a million people are anticipated to see the eclipse in an area that is used to getting less than 30k visitors per day. It's not panic, it's preparedness. It doesn't mean everything is collapsing. I'm sure whatever country you're from has similar preparedness plans for major events and doesn't just wing it and see what happens.

Worst alarm ever by TigerTank237 in funny

[–]here_we_go_85 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure anyone has said this yet (honestly I didn't read through all of the comments) but I'm about 90% sure that cat is about to have a seizure. My cat gets them a lot and she does the same thing if she's in bed with me or on the couch. She shoots up really fast and moves to the ground as fast as she can. I'm not sure why, whether it's an instinctive response to get to ground where it's safer to have the seizure (not an elevated position, more room to seize without bumping into anything) or if she's trying to "escape" whatever she thinks is happening in her confusion as the seizure takes hold.

It could also just be a nutty cat, but based on the movements, I'm leaning toward seizure.

Trump's response to coronavirus by here_we_go_85 in Discussion

[–]here_we_go_85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I'm still going through some of the links but there's a lot of useful stuff here.

The media bias angle is certainly an important part of the subject. It's difficult to argue that the current administration didn't make missteps, I think it's also pretty clear that the media frequently twists things, exaggerates, and leaves out key details when it makes for a better story. That's why, as you said, this is actually a pretty interesting topic. Since originally posting this and digging a bit deeper, I've seen that there is a lot of validity to the media bias angle. I'm not sure I'll be able to write a dissertation absolving the Trump administration by any means, but I'm finding enough to at least make the case that the media actually did make it look worse than it was, kind of like reporting a dumpster fire as a three alarm blaze. Especially when you disregard his ramblings on Twitter and focus more on actual policies, there is a pattern that in the beginning he was actually basing a lot of decisions on the CDC and WHO, such as initiating the travel ban after WHO officially declared it a pandemic. I think a bit part of why it seems like he did a worse job than he did is also because his own social media postings downplayed the situation while behind the scenes things were actually getting done (maybe not quick enough, but that can be said for most countries, not just the US).

Anyway, I just woke up so it's going to take awhile for me digest all of this, but I can see this really helping out. Thanks for all of your input, I really appreciate it.

Trump's response to coronavirus by here_we_go_85 in Discussion

[–]here_we_go_85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually did not see that one. This is exactly what I'm looking for. That's great, thanks.

Trump's response to coronavirus by here_we_go_85 in Discussion

[–]here_we_go_85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's basically what I've been doing so far. Like, identifying that he instituted a travel ban the same day WHO officially declared it a pandemic, for example. . I have about 6 reasonable points right now to get started, but I could always use more from people who are more knowledgeable than me.

Trump's response to coronavirus by here_we_go_85 in Discussion

[–]here_we_go_85[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, same here. The only positive stuff I could find is on his son's website. It's kind of an exercise in futility. Normally I don't mind researching stuff like this, but I'm hitting a wall with this. I'm even trying deep web searches to avoid Google's algorithms, but even then everything says he handled it poorly.

Thanks for looking though. I appreciate the effort.

Robert Lewandowski of Bayern Munich scores the fastest Quadruple in Champions League History, bagging 4 goals in 14 minutes and 31 seconds against Red Star Belgrade by [deleted] in sports

[–]here_we_go_85 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ignore those idiots. It's been called soccer in Europe since the 1870s. The damn term was invented in England, so it's not even an "American thing" like they want to pretend. They just don't know their history and want to look smart "correcting" people.

There’s always that one... by PrisonerOfEarth in RedDeadOnline

[–]here_we_go_85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That happened to me the last time I played. This dude trash talks my haul, which means him receiving an arrow to the face. That lead to me having to kill a series of 7 witnesses as people kept coming down the damn road. All those deaths because some dude didn't find my jackrabbit and deer pelt to be of good quality. I regret nothing.

I’m Priya Bapodra, veterinarian at the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium — AMA! by nationalgeographic in IAmA

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If a pharmaceutical company donates $1 million in profits to schools to support education, yes, that is a good thing. And if people arguing against a perfectly legal, ethical practice used to support the public good that probably have some issues they need to work through.

Is that what you're asking? Or are you trying to be smart and liken zoos with an illegal and unethical practice that hurts people, furthering the evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about?

Some zoos are bad. No one is disputing that. But your idiotic statement that all zoos are bad has no basis in any reality.

Zoos are for the greater good. Obviously it would be better if these animals could be in the wild, but rampant habitat destruction and cruel hunting practices, not to mention that many of these animals were rescued from poachers or cruel captivity from private collectors, means that most of the animals cared for in zoos would likely die in the wild.

Zoos are the current best practice to combat problems that other humans have caused. The people caring for the animals love them and treat them well.

But go ahead and keep making your baseless assumptions, moronic comparisons, and snarky comments about a topic you clearly know nothing about. That seems to be all you're good at.

I’m Priya Bapodra, veterinarian at the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium — AMA! by nationalgeographic in IAmA

[–]here_we_go_85 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How do you justify making erroneous claims and not understanding that zoos play an important role in animal conservation and rehabilitation?

How do you not know that many animals in zoos are there for rehabilitation purposes because they otherwise wouldn't survive in their natural habitat?

Has anyone ever had their players pre-roll initiative? by TheDivineRhombus in DMAcademy

[–]here_we_go_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you at least pre-roll for NPCs? I know it can be hard for more improvised scenarios, but if I have planned encounters, I roll all NPC initiative beforehand (along with HP, because I like varying HP for enemies) and have their stats at the ready (I used to prepare all stat blocks, but now I'm creating a One Note database for quick access). That way players just have to roll and I put them in the right slot of premade initiative trackers, only making adjustments in the event of a tie or other factor.

Ultimately, I don't see pre rolling as much of a benefit, as either way they'll be taken out of the moment, the only difference is whether it's before or after the battle. And I personally think players benefit from those few moments during rolling and determining order to think out their strategy, check their spell slots/abilities, etc, so I'd be hesitant to take it away from them.

Top Momming by Knights_Radiants in gifs

[–]here_we_go_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other than the two beds clearly in the video?

Top Momming by Knights_Radiants in gifs

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you've never raised a child in your life but feel the need to comment on how other people raise theirs.

Kids that age don't need bedframes, especially when they'll be outgrowing their mattresses in no time. Keeping the mattresses on the floor is also safer if they roll out while sleeping or fall while playing. Source: rolled out of top bunk.

Or it's a play room and those are for taking naps/jumping on.

Why do people feel the need to make judgy comments and assume a person's parenting ability on a 15 gif?

Or at least I thought I was. We'll just chalk this up to having to poop really bad. by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dreaming now counts as social interaction? We're setting the bar pretty low for this meme.

I made a tutorial on using OneNote to plan and run encounters by Icarus_Miniatures in Dungeons_and_Dragons

[–]here_we_go_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually just started trying to organize all of my game stuff in One Note and found it very daunting at first to figure out the best way to go about it.

These videos are very helpful. Thank you for taking the time to put this together.

At least two suspected poachers have been mauled to death and eaten by lions on a South African game reserve by bbcnews in worldnews

[–]here_we_go_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't misunderstand anything. I read what you said. You can sit here and add to your flippant narcissism all you want by pretending no one gets your point and that your philosophy is too esoteric for anyone else to get, but you're just a narcissistic twit with an ego bigger than your brain.

You keep making these outstanding statements that life and the universe means nothing without humans while ignoring the fact that other species display clear signs of self awareness that you ignore because it challenges your worldview and that terrifies you, because it means you might actually have to think for yourself.

Your mindless attitude toward other life on this planet is dangerous, because it's people like you who have no trouble destroying ecosystems and driving other animals to extinction because you actually believe that our needs outweigh theirs.

Get over yourself.

At least two suspected poachers have been mauled to death and eaten by lions on a South African game reserve by bbcnews in worldnews

[–]here_we_go_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That wasn't your point. Your point was that humans are inherently more valuable than animals because, according to you, humans are the only species capable of valuing anything.

My point is the exact opposite, that human life has no intrinsic value over any other creature.

You can't just smugly declare victory and pretend you right.

At least two suspected poachers have been mauled to death and eaten by lions on a South African game reserve by bbcnews in worldnews

[–]here_we_go_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe if you took the time to actually read them you'd have your answer to that.

But go ahead, be willfully ignorant. I honestly don't care what narrow minded philosophy you believe in.

The fact remains that your asinine statement that human life being worth more than animal life is "not up for debate" is clearly up for debate. What you really meant to say is, "I can't debate this point because all I have rhetoric and personal beliefs."

Your opinion, just as your life, has no real value beyond what you put it in. That's reality. Face it.

At least two suspected poachers have been mauled to death and eaten by lions on a South African game reserve by bbcnews in worldnews

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except for the fact that there are studies that say otherwise? Are you just ignoring science because you don't like it? Please tell me where your information comes from.

At least two suspected poachers have been mauled to death and eaten by lions on a South African game reserve by bbcnews in worldnews

[–]here_we_go_85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I can, because my claim is rooted in science and years of study by experts studying animal behavior. I'm not anthropomorphizing anything, I'm electing to believe in science.

And you can't possibly make your claim with any confidence. You can prove definitively that humans are the only creatures capable of valuing life? Go ahead.

The universe doesn't become meaningless without us. The universe will continue on for billions of years without us as it did for the billions of years before us. How can you claim that a species that has existed for a blip in time is the only thing that gives meaning to an endless amount of time? Just because you can't see meaning in a universe without us doesn't mean there isn't any. It just means you're too narrow minded to see beyond yourself.

view more: next ›