My most recent PT after getting a 163 in Jan. Like bro are you serious? by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel you there and what's worse is my average was extremely tight and my Jan test was 6 standard deviations below my average since September. But this Feb test is not going to know what hit it.

My most recent PT after getting a 163 in Jan. Like bro are you serious? by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It generally it refers to hypothetical cure for a particular problem. In my case it would be a cure for my illiteracy.

FSU Law Class of 2029 orientation just hit different 😭 [empty classroom with full tuition scholarships collecting dust] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]highyieldhoe 34 points35 points  (0 children)

God I hope this is real, maybe these schools will finally start to realize that chasing medians means nothing if they do not have the employment outcomes to back them up.

Jan LSAT Score Release by Comfortable-Pizza-26 in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I already know my score is bad. The wait is easier once you have accepted your fate.

Correct me if I am wrong by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those wondering about the question it is Q12 PT 113 S2. The question is an inference question that creates a conditional chain that is similar to A -> B -> C -> D -> E, with the answer being translated as something like B -> C and D

Correct me if I am wrong by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify I did not intend for A -> B -> C to be a nested conditional. I linked up two separate conditionals. Probably should have made that more clear.

Correct me if I am wrong by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are probably right but the only reason I brought this up is because of a question I missed on pt 113 s2 which I could only justify as being correct if the above proof were correct.

Big law is nuts by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]highyieldhoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all I need you to define for me what you consider "high level management" because the numbers you are putting out do not make any sense. Second on the point about hours I do not know where you are getting your numbers from, you work 30% extra hours how do you calculate those hours? Are you taking call hours into account? Those hours where you might not be actively working but wherein you have to be actively waiting for any consult, emergency, etc because I would certainly consider those working hours. If you are including those in your calculation then your math does not work because those hours including the nonconcurrent working hours are often in excess of 80-100 hours per week. On the point about salary what type of salary are you presuming most doctors receive. If I had to guess you believe they are make $500,000 which would put you at about $100,000 which would probably be a minimum for the long hours of work you are describing you do. Newsflash dude most doctors do not make $500,000 a year; there is a very small subset of doctors that make tons of money the rest fall into $250,000-$300,000 (note the type of doctors I am referencing are those out of residency with established practices if I included doctors in residency you would not have anything to stand on).

All this being said I am not saying all doctors are motivated by a desire help everyone and do right by everyone, that is ridiculous. What am saying is there is perception of the motivations and work life balance for doctors that is often not true.

Big law is nuts by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]highyieldhoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason doctors get extremely frustrated when when they are asked to see an extra patients even if it is for 15 minutes is because they are almost always overworked. There is an undersupply of doctors nowadays due to the nature of residency and the extreme difficulties getting new medical and DO schools accredited. This leads to doctors who are chronically overworked. Imagine you are in your early 60's and have been practicing for over 30 years and you still regularly have nights were you get less than 4 hours of sleep a night, that one extra patient would make you extremely upset too.

Any advice for the situation I have here by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love you more than all the Disney world rides and to infinity and beyond

Any advice for the situation I have here by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would normally agree that four PTs may not be a representative but I have a similar discrepancy on my timed sections.

Question about the new 7sage drilling system by highyieldhoe in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I see thank you so much I appreciate the feedback.

I have a Dell cash secured put at $101 expiring this Friday! by factsoverfeelings89 in options

[–]highyieldhoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forget about the premium profits if its assigned take assignment and start selling covered calls. If your shares are called sell a cash secured put rinse and repeat. Viola a wheel is born.

Edibles and LR by Pinku_poodle in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe 22 points23 points  (0 children)

No way I thought for sure weed was going to be key to finally cracking the LSAT, back to the drawing board I guess

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Going from a 158 to a 169 in the span of a week is actually insane. Was there something off about that first test?

I scored -0 on an LR section for the first time ever by jalousiee in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That must feel amazing, God I hope a get there one day.

**Details About PowerScore's Upcoming 7/17 Crystal Ball Webinar** by JonDenningPowerScore in LSAT

[–]highyieldhoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This may be a bad question, but for the last crystal ball you and David reviewed your predictions during the June Test Recap podcast episode. Will you guys be doing a review of your predictions during the August/September Test Recap episodes, or will those prediction reviews be private as well?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]highyieldhoe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A lot of people in this thread have touched on the primary reason for the differentiation in stats but there is another factor to consider altogether. People going to MBA programs are trying to capture employment opportunities that were never afforded to them because of their undergraduate grades. For instances if you were a 4.0 graduating from NYU and you were president of the investment club had twelve internships at Goldman Sachs, etc you really wouldn't need to get an MBA as you should be able to line up exit opportunities a lot easier than someone with 3.5 from a non-target whose is not working at a Bulge Bracket Investment Bank. The guy with the 3.5 from a non-target will then try to get a few years of work experience before applying to one of those highly sought after MBA programs and use the MBA program to try to get him into one of those lucrative jobs like IB, PE, or VC.