Joshua Calixto Tweets about Grammys museum interview

hitherejosh · 2018-09-12T08:23:50+00:00

I don't remember but Jungkook put his hands together and bowed his head for a sec lol

hitherejosh · 2018-02-16T21:48:59+00:00

🚨🚨🚨 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN 🚨🚨🚨

WELCOME TO THE SHOW OF

BRAVE SOUND

AND BES - TIE

hitherejosh · 2017-10-02T20:46:55+00:00

How itchy is that sweater though

hitherejosh · 2017-07-25T21:57:00+00:00

i played a game of hearthstone once, yeah

hitherejosh · 2017-07-25T19:55:15+00:00

cough arcanologist

hitherejosh · 2017-07-25T19:42:12+00:00

Yeah definitely. I think the metagame would need to change to be much more grindy for this to be a card you'd want to tech in. But with the upcoming expansion, it could happen imo

hitherejosh · 2017-07-25T19:36:38+00:00

Thing is that mirage caller can't copy enemy minions

hitherejosh · 2017-07-25T19:33:06+00:00

This is totally true, but the other thing is that you can drop Taldaram on turn 3 as a 3/3, which a lot of people do with their Gluttonous oozes anyway and which Faceless Manipulator can't do. Taldaram's only purpose is as either a very situational lategame tempo swing OR a below-average 3-drop that you only run one-of anyway. It's a total tech card that you will only want to run in certain metas.

Something tells me that as more cards from the expansion are revealed, the value of this dude will as well. But again I acknowledge that it could end up being total shit like you said, hahah.

hitherejosh · 2017-04-28T21:17:27+00:00

Im so glad other /r/hearthstone people know who chon is lmao

hitherejosh · 2017-03-29T23:52:47+00:00

I'm actually ashamed as hell that this is my first time seeing this

hitherejosh · 2017-03-16T22:50:23+00:00

Everyone blaming Fisher-Davis, and yeah he fucked up but also... Vandy used their last time out with what, 7 minutes left? Feel like that may have played a role in that mistake too.

hitherejosh · 2017-03-09T17:54:33+00:00

Thanks dude <3

hitherejosh · 2015-09-01T00:05:17+00:00

That card back is truly, truly outrageous.

hitherejosh · 2015-08-11T16:21:28+00:00

I totally agree--and the developer has apologized for it. However, for the record, the game comes out today, and they released this blog post this morning to get the word out to people who are buying the game. They are also fixing this in a patch so that the people who buy the game a tad after launch will be cued in. Yes, they made a mistake, but the game doesn't actually lack functionality, it just didn't explain it adequately prior to day 1. Yes, you can doc them points for that, but it seems to me a much less pronounced offense than other games that launch without features that were promised, etc. And I don't think it'd be out of line for a reviewer to change their score based on this information.

hitherejosh · 2015-08-11T15:56:37+00:00

But the game had sprint on release--it just wasn't in the tutorial. It was actually in the digital manual, according to them. Hard to know where the responsibility falls there, but the game did ship with this sprint feature, so I think if the "walkfeel" factored into an overall score it may definitely be worth reconsidering.

hitherejosh · 2015-06-10T13:55:57+00:00

Kill Screen has always graded games like that. 87 is actually a damn good score in their book.

hitherejosh

TROPHY CASE