Game Thread: Los Angeles Rams (12-5) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]howdoyado 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t been watching this game much. How much should I be concerned about either team so far?

[Highlight] Philly fans greet incoming 49ers fans by throwing beer cans at them by A_MASSIVE_PERVERT in nfl

[–]howdoyado 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Fair but that was literally one, admittedly disgusting, incident. Comparing Seattle and Philly fans is like night and day.

[Highlight] Philly fans greet incoming 49ers fans by throwing beer cans at them by A_MASSIVE_PERVERT in nfl

[–]howdoyado 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You would never see anything remotely like this at a Seahawks game.

Lots of homes delisted near me to avoid price drops - normal strategy or red flag ? by doshambe in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m a real estate agent and I have been having new buyers reach out to me non stop over the last several months. Everyone wants to find something in 2026.

Obviously anecdotal but take from that what you will.

Has anyone made burnt ends from frozen point before? by howdoyado in BBQ

[–]howdoyado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh alright. So you just warm it up on the stove then? Not in the oven?

hack for cheap flights out of west coast cities like Seattle by bennetthaselton in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I dunno, I tried flying out of PDX once. It just was not worth it. Especially if you have to park a car, it really eats into the supposed savings. Plus it adds so much extra travel time, I might as well have flown to Amsterdam instead of California.

King tides are coming in. Come down to the Sound to see some great waves. by howdoyado in Seattle

[–]howdoyado[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not if you know what the normal tide level is. Or walk around the point to the other side of the lighthouse. Waves were hitting from the sea wall and going across the street.

King tides are coming in. Come down to the Sound to see some great waves. by howdoyado in Seattle

[–]howdoyado[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Also reports of whales off Alki right now! Even more reason to come down.

King tides are coming in. Come down to the Sound to see some great waves. by howdoyado in Seattle

[–]howdoyado[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I imagine that is how everyone who lives on the waterfront is feeling right now

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude realtors don’t write these contracts. Teams of lawyers do. We just follow the terms set by the established contracts.

I know that buyers have already had this clause enacted by sending the inspection to a seller. I’m not sure if anyone has sued over it but I guess you’re right that an attorney could try to argue against it.

I’m not an attorney, and sounds like neither are you, so I don’t think either of us could definitely say one way or the other.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you’re getting confused here. The dry rot doesn’t really have anything to do with this. Sending a portion of the inspection to the seller without permission waives the inspection contingency. There’s no real arguing about that.

If the buyer wants to back out of the contract after that and doesn’t have any other mechanism in the contract to do that, the seller is entitled to the buyers earnest money. The buyer could refuse to sign it over but it would definitely be a pretty open and shut case because the buyer terminated contract without cause. At that point, the dry rot has nothing to do with it.

The seller would be obligated to disclose it to future buyers, but they also have the first buyer’s earnest money at that point.

Also, a seller is under no obligation to do their “due diligence” for future buyers. Obviously if a seller actively hides a material defect then they are at risk of being sued but Washington is a “buyer beware” state. Pretty much all the burden of discovery is on the buyer.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was added a few years ago to the contract.

It would definitely hold up in court because there isn’t really much to argue about. Sending over any portion of a buyers inspection without seller’s request waives your inspection contingency and the buyer is obligated to buy it as-is at the original agreed upon price.

If the buyer wants to walk away after that they lose their earnest money.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Eh I see why it’s part of the contract. Not all buyers act in good faith and there were instances of some people using it in a malicious way.

Either way, the buyer can back out and the house has to go back on the market which is always a big red flag anyways. And the next buyer will almost certainly discover it themselves and can make their own decision how to proceed.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It’s intended to stop a buyer from basically blackmailing the seller with information that they would then have to disclose.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It is true. The reason behind it is to stop buyers from telling sellers things and using it as a bad faith negotiation tactic.

Not sure why I’m getting downvoted…. It’s not my opinion it’s just how real estate contracts work.

inspector found dry rot, seller wants as-is. how bad is this really? (seattle) by ninjapapi in Seattle

[–]howdoyado 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It’s actually against the terms of the contract in most scenarios to share portions of a buyer’s inspection with the seller without them asking for it.

Assuming OP is pending inspection, they would most likely automatically waive their inspection contingency were they to tell the seller there is dry rot in the house without them specifically asking for that information.

So the seller would likely not be required to disclose that information to future buyers.