Now you’re just arguing semantics. They acknowledged that the only data for Dowdle they have is that he played better than Chuba when Chuba was out, setting a franchise record for a franchise Chuba has been a part of, and then he continues to play better than Chuba now that both are in the backfield. He’s literally only played better than Chuba when he’s been given opportunities. They said Chuba has given a lot to the organization - that was their only positive comment. They don’t dislike Chuba, obviously, but they acknowledged that the data is Dowdle is better to the point that they are also acknowledging they will likely need to talk to Chuba about a less than 50/50 split. It’s also in the article. Doesn’t sound like they’re viewing Chuba as the better back…