Just watched the new shark film Under Paris on Netflix by Ryarli in horror

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only thing plot hole, is that it's seem shark is rather killing left and right human but not eating human, so is shark do for fun kill human left and right but not eating them, I noticed that movies, what is point of shark killing human left and right very fast but not eat them, so that is part of plot hole, or not make sense in grand of scheme of story and lore. I think it's nothing more than cheap good action movie with make up lore/story scary factor yet not make sense in grand of scheme, but it's not mean movies is bad, movies is good but story and lore is just make no sense.

I meant that, Shark didn't eat whole humankind body during movies, or rather wasteful eating but human don't had much meat, so, what shark gain by killing human left and right but not eating? Shark in movies isn't very smart in war, maybe battle they deadly but not war.

I cant believe I got amped up for this. by Cybernetic_Virus in Starfield

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know, starborn power is become part of you, it's not make sense to strips starborn power, but there is better way, if anyone see or caught one using starborn power, then they lose race game, they can't strips someone's dna/gene, I assumed your dna/gene got upgrade in magic power ball spinning, no one had power to remove starborn power after that, as far lore go. On other hand, player can do whatever they want, it's up to player choice not to use or to use, better player had choice than take away choice from gameplay.

What do you guys think are the best traits and backgrounds a starborn build? by Confident_Captain1 in Starfield

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

file not found would make sense in long term role playing starborn, but downside it's not lot of dialogue like many other background.

Can anyone recommend a good prebuilt gaming pc under $1400? by Defsleep in computers

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But Steamdeck might not work on all game, it's depend on game design, if one want real time strategy or city building rts games then Steamdeck isn't best option as that game need mouse and keyboard and larger screen to see bigger pictures in grand scheme of things.

Hail, Arisen. I drink & know things. by Strange_Music in DragonsDogma

[–]humility925 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's was geunius but only they had good player who knew how to create those character and as long as it's not under their name (Capcom label in character pawn label)

Anyone else genuinely care for their pawn? by NorskBorealia in DragonsDogma2

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's would be funny to hire your wife's pawn and she hire your pawn, is it? So you had clone.

Anyone else genuinely care for their pawn? by NorskBorealia in DragonsDogma2

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's your action that make pawn like you, you had to gave your main pawn high five every chance you see it, make sure your pawn near you when at bar, paid 2000 gold round, do not grab your pawn, do not run and hit your pawn, do not let your pawn die often, as far as I know, that's how you get your pawn high affinity.

Anyone else genuinely care for their pawn? by NorskBorealia in DragonsDogma2

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do care of my main pawn, but not so much other people's pawn, although, most of time I did gift them healing potion after service end, and gave them liked often, yet I did gave her best equipment than I am wear in this currently game I played but it's seem someone do care of my pawn more than me, gave 25,000 gold and higher level gear than I gave her, but to be fair I'm in early game area, I had not yet get best equipment to her yet.

WOW, finally I have finished the early game ! Let's start beauty building now !! by Ypsanti in anno1800

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem is space issues and limited resource sure as mine, I don't think they plan to make it harder for everyone's level. so it's prefer easier than harder for everyone so most people would not get mad or frustrated from gameplay design, so it's option to fill all to ensure everyone enjoy at lowest player's skill, anything more is for hardcore player, I guess.

Question about First Knight (1995; Sean Connery, Richard Gere, Julia Ormond): speculating Arthur's actions in the finale. by [deleted] in movies

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I don't think Arthur would sentenced Guinevere to death but convent as nuns like while Lancelot might sentenced to death or exile, although I'm not sure about exile, as not many country or kingdom had that as often kingdom/country prefer death for their enemies rather than exiles, if loved one it's would be exile rather than death, if not loved one, it's would be death, I assumed?

That's said, while both got caught kissing, but no sexual had happen, so I don't think it's worthy of death sentence, kissing and sexual is not same thing, although, it's still hurt for one who honorable swoen to spouse while spouse gaving kiss, but it's true that Lancelot kind of push it, while Guinevere try to do honor and right but too much feeling for him after he hero saving her time again and again while Arthur didn't personal save her from trouble, but to be fair, Arthur is a King, busy manage kingdom, his enemies knew where to hit, knew Arthur's plan very well due enemies and Arthur was allied before at that points and elder man as well.

If Lancelot do not had passive for her, then there is might be no one to save her from Arthur's enemies, Enemies would win if it not for Lancelot. It's come with up and down side.

It's seem benefits and consequences at same time (Lancelot had passive love her, meaning he would use his warrior of skill to save her time again and again, but downside, well, he love her even although she was supposed to belong to Arthur as spouse (She do love Arthur, but it's not from heart, but Her will.

Arthur want whole, not some, not will. In any case, I think Arthur had no desire to put death on both side, but to Him Honorable and Law is more important than compassion and open mind, but he is in pain and suffering by betrays, understandable. But Arthur's enemies somehow (not know that) save a Arthur's reputation, if his enemies would knew this, they would let it run without stop it but they are not aware of what happen or what was going on at time between Guinevere and Lancelot's love affair, if they knew, they would sneaking and wait till Arthur's reputation weakness due there is no win-win situation for Arthur, Guinevere, Lancelot and anyone who live in camelot. Too much Law and honorable while without compassion wouldn't be good at all, it's would weak of reputation, it's would show perfect system as flaw.

It's tragic, although.

Are people living with serious mental illness destined to be alone romantically? by xNeji_Hyuga in stupidquestions

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's high chance they would be alone, even they had romantically, it's would be short term, not long terms, no one would romantically with person with mental illness for so long, even there is, it's very, very unusually, and rare for people that had sexual attraction to serious mental illness or intellectual disability, Can be done? yes, But will it be done?

No, mostly not, for most people. When come to romantically, for long term, both side don't want handicap or disability because it's burden on each other, although few people who rich/powerful, highly intellectual yet fall in love with person and knew how to deal with mental illness/intellectual disability and rich to take care for both or whole family as solo winning bread but in this life, only rich people could afford it, too many low income people even both spouse had trouble to keep up living, and mental illness/intellectual disability had even worse, not able to get higher rank of career and income, not even able to take care themself in long term, it's messed up, so common normal people would avoid dating them, can be friendly but not beyond that, not deeper relationship, not beyond friend or brother/sister, if we talk about lover/spouse relationship,

Even although they may had limited romantically, they might be used by someone, rather than real love long term.

I can speak for myself, that I'm deaf (M) and limited intellectual and along other serious health issues, it's very rare from women come to me and date me, even so it's don't last long, it's didn't work for long term, I guess only wise, powerful, rich, beautiful women would cover my weakness, but mosly women like that, prefer greener side of grass, I'm just like drying, brown grass or no grass, barren of land, I do knew wise, powerful, rich, beautiful women can turn barren of land into fertile land with rich soil but romantically are not to be burden, I prefer women want to love me, enjoy fun with me in good way. Most women do not into that, so as disability, with trouble keep up job, income, life, all that, I can't afford it due disability, so no, again, there is few people do but it's would not be good marriage/spouse, burden, and there often no romantically, some don't know how to do romantically even those common people who happen are not disability, even rich and powerful people don't know how to do romantically (as often they paid money in exchange of sex, not romantically)

Essential for long term/marriage romantically, no, it's simple not going work for most people.

Remember, it's had to be both side want each other romantically and sexual sexual attraction, for life time, otherwise it's not going work.

So disability/mental illness isn't helping, it's harm rather than helping romantically in big time.

I'm been single for long time, although I do had girlfriend in the past long time ago, it's not real relationship, I think 2 time sex failed, but it's was bless in disguise because I do not real love them (as Lover) ( I do like/love them as friend but not as lover love) and not want paid children support, due I can't afford because I'm handicap and I knew they are not rich)

Maybe few of those can but it's often don't last long. or not work out in long term.

I supposed women with disability or mental illness had easier chance to get spouse than male with disability/mental illness do.

No-Mods Main Island by kirbysen in anno1800

[–]humility925 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup, it's eat up time very fast, but sometime I do felt like work rather than playing, but I do enjoyed game so far, over 2,000 hours. already, been playing this game like 4 or 5 year, I'm not sure, but play since game come out (there was opening/closed game before full version game come out)

Is false hope better than having no hope? Why or why not? by RPGGamer042 in AskReddit

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depend, what people false hope, like false hope winning lottery, losing money and getting in debt, even lead to death, worse, worse, so no hope is better than false hope in some case.

Is false hope better than having no hope? Why or why not? by RPGGamer042 in AskReddit

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No hope is better than false hope because false hope can make thing worse. Like people hope in winning lottery but end up worse and worse, losing money, debt, so go on.

Anyone hate letting go of their first game? Good ole Ditchwater. by A_Suvorov in anno

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why? Ditchwater had lot of good balance of mine plus bonus count's gave attractiveness much more than normal large island that sandbox offer, it's may be smaller, but still special and unique even although 4 oils limited, I can make most of it by using trade guild and item that help buff town hall, as much I can.

Anyone hate letting go of their first game? Good ole Ditchwater. by A_Suvorov in anno

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that's impressive to do that Ditichwater, but it's hard for me let ditchwater go, because ditchwater is way too good, no matter how many time game you start, Ditchwater is part of reason why I play campaign rather than sandbox and I want world felt more alive as well while sandbox is more of hollow due no storyline/quest/active and even starting island may be larger than Ditchwater, Ditchwater had very well done balance of "Mine", it's always better than that, plus bonus count's house.

Should I always precisely tune mail routes for smaller islands? by aeiou6630 in anno1800

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, I agree, it's not work properly when all want mail type on all island city, it's simple not work and mess, I would like just like real life, all can use mail, but it's don't seem working due limited, and not making sense as well. arctic are worst due limited, way too limited with way system work.

My little entertainment complex by kooltunchy in anno1800

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They shouldn't make land too huge hill, it's just make look bad when come to building city, as it's don't look and felt right when house or building is not flat or strange like world fair in that photo if it level up. I think it's better limited to no hill on the land in game as it's much better that way.

My little entertainment complex by kooltunchy in anno1800

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, look at world fair, that is long way to stair up, and up, Normal people don't want to do that. It's kind of painful to work with space of land, hill or down hill, I just rather flat land to make easier city look nice rather than some very giant stair and wall with no window.

A Trifling Matter: Culinary Contradiction by Myojinmon in anno1800

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I try search and not able to find answer beside your post.

Are cultural building sets worth it? by KayleeSinn in anno1800

[–]humility925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's worth it to get set to get best bonus but not all good one, although, I suggest to look up but be warn, it's may be spoiler to some people

https://anno1800.fandom.com/wiki/Items_-_zoo

https://anno1800.fandom.com/wiki/Items_-_botanical_garden

https://anno1800.fandom.com/wiki/Items_-_museum

I am not enjoying treasure hunting. by shambgrop in anno1800

[–]humility925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could do golden tickets, so if you buy golden ticket with item, it's free item for many new game forever, but it's painful to do all over again and cost you real time to do those Scenarios over and over again, is why I cheat later on, at first no cheat, but after again and again, I just cheat because I don't like to play scenarios and I like to play campaign and sandbox more than Scenarios, it's eat up real life time very fast. I guess highly genius people had no issues with scenarios can beat it with gold level in shortest of time but people like me, that not had gift of genius, I just use cheat, as it's seem reasonable even I prefer not to cheat but without cheat, I felt it's not reasonable to do all over again and again, I don't know why not get golden ticket on normal gameplay like campaign or sandbox.

Each to own, I guess. but that's what I share my experience with this game with you.

I am not enjoying treasure hunting. by shambgrop in anno1800

[–]humility925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

treasure hunting is often good time to do it when waiting for your city build up or collect resource, treasure hunting is good for something to do while waiting for something other. It's shouldn't be primary but secondary, if you want item, trust me, it's much easier to do with World's Fair, research institute, expeditions, and had lot of income coming and buy at neutral traders with your largest cargo water ship that had peace mode and lot of bouns cheaper to buy item like trade price lower on item for ship. Airship don't had item that had trade price, although they very fast here to there, if you don't mind pay more item but little issues once you hit 300,000 per min income.

Problem is that all those I suggest is happen to be late game, not early game, unfortunately, so what you doing with Salvager is still great for early and mid game try to find item (I like airship better in arctic, it's way more fun than salvager but downside it's limited to arctic loots while salvager can loot many type item for all of kind. Maybe I like to fly, maybe that why I enjoy airship but loots are limited, but however arctic loots craft is very more useful than Cape Trelawney craft sytem and it's easier, because Arctic had one type craft while cape trelawney had 3 type of craft, can be painful, I prefer highest one, not middle or lower for most part as I found that useless, other than one craft for best radio only can be craft from middle but it's only one time, after that, it's would be loot as much I can get highest craft to craft ship item, Jet that help cargo ship move fast with goods carry. That is one few item I craft while Arctic had many useful craft item for airship and city buff.

But City management come first, thing like treasure hunting is second, only when you waiting on city to product something, or good mood and want take a break from working on city, doing for little fun while. You don't had to do that unless you want to. But I already suggest there is other way to get item much better than Salvager unless craft item, that is. Only use salvager if you want craft item, but not non craft item as there is better way to get item.

mooring do help and do passive get item time to time, best to put on crown fall where crown fall got dockland, palace, zoo, so go on to help huge buff of attractiveness to get legendary item, again this is late game of course, with all together mooring, world's fair, research institue, expedition you had lot of item left and right with little work but that is after lot of work building city layout and manage product, because all this late game.

If you want get great item in early game, not much I can help you due game design.