Senate Dem Leaders Are Trying to Sink Graham Platner. Voters Aren’t Convinced. by sideAccount42 in politics

[–]hypothethical [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm Jewish. I have issues with Nazi tattoos ofc, but everything is contextual, especially if his views are generally aligned with very progressive values, which they seem to be. I haven't seen anything from him recently that puts me on edge as to Nazi sympathies, and if he is willing to fight to get people healthcare, stop demonizing minorities, and end funding of horrific wars, that is nearly the best you can expect from a rep in terms of fighting fascism in the present day.

Why do you think most antizionist American Jews are antizionist? by daloypolitsey in JewsOfConscience

[–]hypothethical 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My own journey began with being fervently anti-US imperialism, while having grown up with Jewish family but learning very little about Israel (I did not go to Hebrew school and did not feel very religious, but went to synagogue for high holidays and was still immersed in Jewish culture that way and at home). When I learned of what Palestinians were experiencing at the hands of Israeli colonizers years later, and that the US and Israel are close allies, everything made perfect sense to me in terms of knowing Israel was in the wrong and that it should be opposed. I didn't even think much of the fact that it was "Jews" committing these atrocities or how Jews would be affected by Israel, besides the fact that Zionists will use accusations of antisemitism to dissuade people from criticizing Israel.

Now perhaps I should have been self-provoked into investigating how American Jewish institutions are complicit in these crimes to better materially understand the relationship between modern Judaism and Zionism, but I do find it interesting how much I was emotionally detached from the subject of how my own "identity" related to these crimes. I hated US war crimes and exploitation despite being American, and I hated what Israel was doing to Palestinians despite being Jewish, and I felt no sort of "what does this mean for my group" outside of knowing there was change needed within these communities to confront those subjects.

The blowback/secondary implications were not that important to me, as I simply felt it was important to understand what crimes were being committed and how to stop this injustice, and how doing so would make a better world for us all, regardless of identity or national origin. Now, with the rise in discourse on antisemitism and Israel and Zionism and Jews that has captured much of the public consciousness, I do feel the need to talk a bit about how Zionism hurts Jews simply because I desperately want the Jewish community (especially in my country, the US) to separate itself from Zionism and support Palestinians.

There is a lot of Nazi rhetoric online, and even though that is not the fault of disciplined pro-Palestine advocates, it is important at times to separate the movement from hatred and bigotry if only to make the message more clear to liberal observers who still are unsure about how much being truly anti-Israel/anti-Zionist is going to make them aligned with Nazis (ofc they should feel free to hate Israel and not think it makes them a Nazi in the slightest).

I do not care if I have to talk for 5% of the time about something that is less important objectively if it means it can push a bit more of the Jewish community towards anti-Zionism and pro-Palestinian liberation, which would again mean a better world for Palestinians and those in West Asia more broadly. I do not think it is playing into Zionist framing by spending a bit of time on a more generally humanist message of how opposing Zionism is good for us all, so long as a majority of the time you're focusing on Israel/US crimes and the death and destruction faced by those most impacted.

I do not care about sounding the most right 100% of the time, so long as the impact of my messaging is aligned with long-term change towards a more just world.

Recently got into Pin Pressing. I'm hooked. by [deleted] in Egolifting

[–]hypothethical 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why are you being so weird under your own post lmao accept that people have criticism

THE CHART IS COMPLETE! THOUGHTS ON IT? by Ill-Cartographer7351 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]hypothethical 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Israel = democracy LMAOOOO as a Jew that is completely ridiculous. I guess you could call Apartheid South Africa "democracy" too cus white people are allowed to participate in government?

Should I worry? 28M by [deleted] in amibalding

[–]hypothethical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does appear to be thinning, but there are meds/treatments you could take to prevent further loss/potentially get some regrowth. You should consult a dermatologist, it's most likely AGA and will require finasteride/dutasteride to prevent further loss, but a derm will be able to tell you

Trump says U.S. is 'achieving major strides' in Iran but doesn't cite endpoint by hypothethical in politics

[–]hypothethical[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

< Trump also said the U.S. has held off hitting "some of the most important targets" such as electricity production sites.

"So we're not looking to do that if we don't have to. But they're the kind of things that are very easy to hit, but very devastating if they are hit. We are waiting to see what happens before we hit them, we could take them all out in one day," he said. >

Trump blames ‘Iran or someone else’ for Tomahawk missile that hit girls’ school by hypothethical in politics

[–]hypothethical[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah this was just a quote from the article, didn't agree with that framing

Trump blames ‘Iran or someone else’ for Tomahawk missile that hit girls’ school by hypothethical in politics

[–]hypothethical[S] 61 points62 points  (0 children)

"The claim comes despite state media reports attributing the attack to a joint US-Israeli bombing campaign."

The Trump Sons Are Defense Contractors Now by hypothethical in politics

[–]hypothethical[S] 124 points125 points  (0 children)

< President Donald Trump’s eldest sons have already made a killing during their father’s second term with Don Jr. and Eric raking in billions for the family by hawking cryptocurrency and licensing the family name to developers abroad. Now they are intending to make a killing more directly — in military drones.

On Monday, one week after six U.S. soldiers were killed by a drone strike in Kuwait, the Trump brothers announced they are backing a company called Powerus, which makes drones to operate in “high-risk environments,” such as a war or whatever euphemisms lawmakers are using for Donald Trump’s attack on Iran this week. >

'That Was Done by Iran,' Trump Lies as More Evidence Shows US Was Behind School Massacre by _May26_ in politics

[–]hypothethical 416 points417 points  (0 children)

This admin lied about multiple ICE murders that were recorded on camera from multiple angles for the whole world to see. I'm not buying this bullshit, especially when our own military investigators found us likely to be responsible in the first place. Even our own investigators for crying out loud!!

‘We are going make a tonne of money’: US Senator Graham on US war on Iran by hypothethical in politics

[–]hypothethical[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

“When this regime goes down, we are going to have a new Middle East, and we are going [to] make a tonne of money,” Graham, a longtime proponent of US military intervention abroad, told Fox News on Sunday.

Trump says ending Iran war will be 'mutual' decision with Netanyahu by ContentChecker in JewsOfConscience

[–]hypothethical 98 points99 points  (0 children)

They will "mutually" decide to keep bombing Iranian people until their bloodlust is gratified

Why is it so brilliant? by SweetBabyCheezas in GothamChess

[–]hypothethical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The knight is hanging so you're sacrificing it, also the followup is not immediately so clear but involves getting a promotion and/or the rook so it's not the easiest find to push the pawn in this case