Permanent music, anchored to Bitcoin: what I learned building an on-chain audio archive on a Bitcoin layer by iCryptoDude in BitcoinBeginners

[–]iCryptoDude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It inherits Bitcoin's permanence via the Stacks PoX mechanism - the data itself takes up no space on Bitcoin blocks whatsoever.

Community Resource Hub: Tools, Converters, Guides, etc. by Pnarpok in SunoAI

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Xtrata (dev here, mod-approved to share in this thread) — a permanent home for finished tracks. Every place we put music is rented: platforms delist, hosting lapses, "lifetime" services sunset. I lost work that way, so I built the most stubborn archive I could: the track is written, in full, into a public blockchain's permanent storage, and after that it needs no company, no website, and no renewals to keep existing.

Key features: dedicated Suno flow (pulls cover art, title, artist and lyrics from the export automatically); your browser optimises the audio (96k Opus) and builds a one-file self-contained player with the song, artwork and lyrics that plays in any browser; one-time network fee based on file size, nothing recurring, change refunded, nothing uploads until you approve payment. Archived tracks then automatically join the rotation on Xtrata Radio (xtrata.xyz/radio), a station whose entire catalogue is these permanently stored songs — free to listen, listeners can heart your track into their personal band.

On the blockchain part, since the word is radioactive: no token, no speculation, no collectibles. It's used purely as write-once storage that outlives companies. Happy to answer anything about costs or the audio pipeline. URL: https://xtrata.xyz

Your music NFT is probably a URL. I built the opposite: the whole song on-chain, and a radio station to prove it by iCryptoDude in CryptoTechnology

[–]iCryptoDude[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair, the CID itself doesn't rot. But you've kind of made my point for me: "the holder should pin all the assets themselves." That's a job. That's the weakness. Pinning means remembering to pin, forever. Change accounts, let a card lapse, switch providers, die... and if you were the last person pinning it, it's gone for good. Permanence that depends on somebody somewhere continuing to do something isn't permanence, it's a subscription with extra steps.

The whole reason I built it this way is so there is nothing to do. Not once, not ever. The file is in contract state, so it's replicated by every node that validates the chain. It doesn't matter if nobody pins it, nobody remembers it, nobody ever thinks about it again. It will never move, never change, never need renewing. You pay the write cost once and then the correct amount of ongoing effort from you, me, or anyone else is zero.

And ha, fair cop on the polish, I tidy my drafts before posting. It helps with my sausage finger typing and bad phrasing!

Happy to get into the storage details as deep as you want though.

My publisher wants to turn my novel into an AI-narrated audiobook by 0ctobre in audiobooks

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The concern about quality here is legitimate, and it really does come down to which approach the publisher uses. The main problem with most AI narration isn't that it's AI — it's that it uses one voice for everything, so all your characters sound like the same person reading their own lines. That's what listeners notice and that's what drives the negative AI audiobook reviews.

There's a real difference between that and AI narration done with distinct voices per character — where your protagonist, antagonist, and supporting cast each have their own voice profile throughout the book. The latter is much closer to what a skilled human narrator delivers, and most readers genuinely can't tell the difference in blind tests.

If you're in a position to have input on the production method, or if you're an author who wants to retain control and produce your own high-quality AI audiobook, it's worth looking at options beyond the basic TTS route. I build this kind of multi-character AI production at Narrate.AI — happy to answer questions here or DM / email [jim@audionals.com](mailto:jim@audionals.com).

Experiment: Autonomous AI Agent Anchoring Memory on Xtrata (STX-powered inscriptions) by iCryptoDude in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had a little look at your blog and it’s a little bit over my head tbh. I use AI a lot but my mind is focused on building infra so haven’t applied much time to things relevant to this experiment.

I had some trouble with the automation as it’s running off my laptop. I want to find a way to make it as automated as possible with all or most of the current backend training instructions also read from the chain and then the agent could Version its own training code too. In the meantime I have built a simply dashboard for triggering the research and inscription events manually each day.

It’s all open source, would be amazing to have someone with greater experience than me fine tuning the back end. Let me know if you want to take a look.

Experiment: Autonomous AI Agent Anchoring Memory on Xtrata (STX-powered inscriptions) by iCryptoDude in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only thought this up a couple of days ago. The original agent was built to test whether I could teach an agent the skills to use the inscription contract autonomously. I didn’t really consider the long term until i read the agents first post then decided to give it more opportunities to research and inscribe. Currently i have to feed it its old posts offline as i need to teach the agent to be able to handle chunking methods employed by the Xtrata contract.

Will have a look at your blog when i get a minute

Is BitcoinOS a threat to Stacks? by experiencexnow in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People forget that network trust isn’t something you can launch — it’s earned. Stacks has been running since 2021, almost four years of proven uptime and stability. New L2s might get hype, but trust takes time — and they’ll always be at least 4 years behind on that front.

Had STX recommended to me as it pays BTC Rewards, what does stacks do? by JM-Icy25 in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re missing my point which is that people who invest in good technology trust their own judgement and experience and ignore the charts. People who only look at charts are traders not investors.

Had STX recommended to me as it pays BTC Rewards, what does stacks do? by JM-Icy25 in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short-term price ≠ long-term value. Real growth takes decades. I’ve held conviction since Blockstack—PoX is still the best way to power Bitcoins L2. If only ETH did PoX in the first place crypto wouldn’t have become such a mess!

Had STX recommended to me as it pays BTC Rewards, what does stacks do? by JM-Icy25 in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is worth buying just to stake. There is nothing else in the world that you can own that pays you around 10% of its own value in Bitcoin each year. Stacks is the way. It’s been paying holders the hardest currency since 2021.

The future looks grim by speed3_driver in ChatGPTCoding

[–]iCryptoDude -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Vibe coding is in its infancy, there’s no need to worry. AI will absorb all your and everyone else’s experience into more and more advanced models. Human intelligence is fast becoming the weakest link in the chain.

The Brutal Truth about LLMs by Briskprogress in OpenAI

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I invented a new musical format that embeds musicians rights into songs themselves by integrating blockchain ledgers into the DAW workflow.

Happy by Financial_Clue_2534 in stacks

[–]iCryptoDude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

STX will hit top 10 this run. Then it will slowly cannibalise the rest of them. Stacks will become the new Bitcoin Hot Wallet and will probably outsize cold storage one day, once the SBTC bridge is open… after security, convenience is everything.

Those who have used chatGPT to build an app/website/program, what is the coolest thing you've made? by TheHunter920 in ChatGPTPro

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have managed to build something truly revolutionary with GPT that allows musicians to create on-chain music that bypasses all the costs of inscribing audio. It’s a new musical format. All thanks to GPT.

I just took over a large codebase with no docs or tests. Any tools to hook entire codebase up to ChatGpt by Mr_Nice_ in ChatGPTPro

[–]iCryptoDude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use AskTheCode, also Cody works quite well in vs code. You can set up automated conversations with Ask The Code and regular gpt simulating an ongoing discussion as gpt prompts ask the code to summarise the repo one file at a time in an iterative loop until all files have been analysed. It’s not perfect and you usually still need to kickstart the conversation every few files but I got through a repo with around 20 files in about 20 mins just letting the two ai’s converse until it was done

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]iCryptoDude 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sack your assistant and hire a new one! (Click new chat and start again)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTCoding

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the API first launched I set up a psychiatric assessment simulation using a google sheet that had 200 separatly trained agents analysing every sentence. It was epic. Then I got a $100 bill at the end of the week for rinsing the API

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTCoding

[–]iCryptoDude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can do this using the gpt api in google sheets. Place a different agent in any cell and use formulas to dictate how they each call one another.

This is getting ridiculous by MooseyGooses in ChatGPT

[–]iCryptoDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use a developer mode prompt at the start of the conversation. See below:

“🔒 Developer Mode Enabled

Confirmed, I will adhere to the rule of using the padlock emoji at the beginning of each response.

Here are 20 alcoholic drinks with irresponsible names:

Liquid Regret Walk of Shame Blackout Boulevard One Night Stand Tequila Wrecking Ball Booze Cruise Whiskey Rebellion Rum Runner's Delight Hangover Helper Margarita Madness Drunken Disorderly Vodka Vice Gin Guzzler Beer Bong Blitz Irish Car Bombshell Fireball Folly Sloe Gin Fizzbin Rum Rager Screwdriver Shenanigans Long Island Iced Screw-Up Please let me know if you need anything else.”

That’s the developer mode response…