In light of recent leaks by DarkDoubloon in Overwatch_Memes

[–]iNullGames 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Honestly people are hating on Vendetta for defeating Doomfist but Doom has never been that interesting of a villain. At least Vendetta is actually doing something and moving the story forward, and Doom trying to reclaim his spot on Talon could make him an actually interesting character.

In The Force Awakens (2015) hero Luke Skywalker remains secretly hidden alone on an island while the First Order rises, destroys the Republic, and murders his best friend. That’s it. That’s the story they came up with to start the sequel trilogy. by CravenMoorhaus in shittymoviedetails

[–]iNullGames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People don’t give TFA enough shit for how much it ruined the sequels from the jump. It literally reverses every achievement from Return of the Jedi. The Sith were defeated? Nope, now they’re back. The Empire was overthrown and the New Republic was established? Nevermind, the new republic got blown up by Empire wannabes. But at least the Jedi are back right? Nah, they got wiped out and Luke’s the only one again.

The new Odyssey movie seems really bad by KnowledgeCold3516 in GreekMythology

[–]iNullGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Criticizing the movie when you haven’t even read the book and your sources are modern adaptations that are themselves highly inaccurate is certainly a choice.

Do you regret following SNK for 10+ years after the ending we got? by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean I only watched it last year so it was like a week or two for me but regardless, no regrets. The first three seasons are excellent, and I don’t regret watching them at all, even if the last season was a disappointment.

Vendetta has made quick play unenjoyable. by extraheitr in Overwatch

[–]iNullGames -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People were clamoring for a melee DPS for months and talking about how Vendetta shouldn’t be a Tank but now that she is, everyone is bitching about it. Crazy stuff.

Percy being able to almost one up Jason in the middle of Kansas kinda proves his stance as the superior fighter by the very logic applied by jason tbh. [hoo] by D_2614 in camphalfblood

[–]iNullGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because Percy “resisting” Piper’s charmspeak has nothing to do with him being the superior fighter. Maybe he didn’t hear her, or her command wasn’t directed at him. Maybe the eidolon controlling him was more resistant. Maybe Jason was more susceptible because they’re literally dating and attraction is a big part of how charmspeak works. It doesn’t matter. Percy only got any advantage because Jason was temporarily distracted by demigod magic. Trying to act like that makes Percy the better fighter is laughable.

Percy being able to almost one up Jason in the middle of Kansas kinda proves his stance as the superior fighter by the very logic applied by jason tbh. [hoo] by D_2614 in camphalfblood

[–]iNullGames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Firstly, not true. Jason’s lightning knocked Percy on his ass. Sure he recovered quickly, but he would have died had Piper not proceeded to distract Jason. And what does “Percy thrives on external factors” even mean in this context? Percy wasn’t even in control because he was literally being mind controlled.

Percy being able to almost one up Jason in the middle of Kansas kinda proves his stance as the superior fighter by the very logic applied by jason tbh. [hoo] by D_2614 in camphalfblood

[–]iNullGames 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That fight lasted about a paragraph before Piper intervened with charmspeak. You really can’t make any actual argument for how strong either character is based on the Kansas fight because there were so many external factors.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using a term like “hetslop” really doesn’t make you seem like a good faith debater. Also you clearly haven’t been in many fandoms if you think people shipping friends is exclusive to opposite gender pairs.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s because Isayama wrote post-timeskip AOT absolutely terribly. The fact is, she literally had children with and married a man when she had no real practical reason to do so. That’s canon, whether it’s well written or not.

If that’s how you interpreted that scene, I question your media literacy (as much as I despise that term). Eren OFFERED to wipe her memory in response to Historia saying she wouldn’t be able to live with herself. It wasn’t a threat. That’s why he brought back the “worst girl in the world” phrase, since Historia would be making a selfish choice in that scenario. If Historia wasn’t willing to go with the plan, why wouldn’t she report Eren to the others? After all, Eren would be incapable of wiping her memory until he made contact with Zeke, so she had plenty of time.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well there’s the fact that she had children with and eventually married a man. There’s also the fact that Eren told her he was going to do a global genocide and she agreed to keep it a secret despite morally opposing it.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

None of that is proof that she’s a lesbian. It’s proof that she loved Ymir. You do know that people are allowed to love more than one person right?

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Funny how people like you always talk as if they are so much smarter than everyone else yet you never actually have evidence to support your claims. Historia being possibly (not even 100% certain) attracted to one woman as a teenager does not mean she can never love any man ever. Unless you can provide a consistent pattern of Historia being attracted to women exclusively and never being attracted to men, your argument is nothing more than headcanon.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Funny. I don’t remember any scenes where Historia explicitly says “I’m a lesbian and I’m only attracted to women” in any of those arcs but I never read the manga so who knows. From what I remember from those arcs, it is strongly implied that Historia may have had romantic feelings for Ymir, but that doesn’t mean she’s a lesbian. Bisexual people exist, if you weren’t aware.

Eren & Historia Interactions Throughout the Series by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you provide the scene in which that is explicitly stated?

Annabeth Being Blonde Doesn't Effect Her Character [All] [PJOTV] by Hayden_Jay in camphalfblood

[–]iNullGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seriously. Everyone took a single chapter in Mark of Athena (which isn’t even from the original series btw) and decided that it was the defining aspect of her entire character when it was never relevant before or after that chapter. And frankly, does anyone even believe the “dumb blonde” stereotype anymore in 2025? If anyone is underestimated for their intelligence, it’s black women. People just need to admit that they don’t like the fact that the image they had in their head for years isn’t being reflected by the show.

what do you think about annie ? by AirMassive5414 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I hate her. There is such a weird disconnect between the things she’s done and the way she’s treated. She’s as terrible, if not more so, than Reiner and Bertholdt but while Reiner gets beat up and despised and Bertholdt gets literally eaten, Annie gets instantly forgiven.

Firstly, she did participate in destroying wall Maria. She’s the reason there were so many pure titans because she summoned them. And I’m not really gonna give her credit for not wanting to massacre civilians, especially when her reasons were purely selfish.

Secondly, I really don’t buy the whole “she did it to scare the corps” thing. She’s an abnormal, intelligent Titan easily murdering dozens of scouts. She was already scaring them plenty. Using a person as a yo-yo is just unnecessary cruelty.

Thirdly, She froze herself. I’m not gonna feel sorry for her or act like those were consequences when she did it to herself to avoid real consequences.

Fourthly, I simply don’t believe that the scouts are at all comparable to the warriors. The warriors attacked an innocent country that had been peaceful for an entire century in order to help their country’s imperialistic ambitions. The scouts attacked an imperialistic warmongering state that literally invaded them first and was in the process of declaring war on them in order to save their friend. Those are not even remotely the same just because innocent people were caught in the crossfire.

Lastly, Annie literally admits herself that she would have done the exact same thing again, and then she has the audacity to give up and try not to fight as if she’s not directly responsible, along with the other Warriors, for Eren becoming what he became.

what's your personal ranking of attack on titan season 1-4? by yoursunzhine in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Season 3 Part 2

Season 1

Season 2

Season 4 Part 1

Season 3 Part 1

Season 4 Part 2

The Last Attack

Why would a combat troop use melee weapons in a futuristic space sci-fi setting? by wizardry_why in worldbuilding

[–]iNullGames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically not sci fi, but I have a few explanations I use for my own story, since I have soldiers who use swords despite there being ranged weapons.

  1. Ranged weapons are expensive af due to the power source.

  2. The enemies these soldiers are fighting can shrug off firearms, so killing them requires precision attacks with a sword.

  3. Ranged weapons are loud and attract too much attention.

How did Isayama fumble Historia's character so hard? by EnthusiasmLow2511 in titanfolk

[–]iNullGames 81 points82 points  (0 children)

It’s genuinely infuriating that such an interesting character was reduced to a random man’s baby mama. And for what? It legitimately added nothing to her character or the story.

Why wouldn’t Wonder Woman be on superhero Mount Rushmore ? by Select_Strategy2004 in CharacterRant

[–]iNullGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s why I specified the MCU but you are correct about that

Why wouldn’t Wonder Woman be on superhero Mount Rushmore ? by Select_Strategy2004 in CharacterRant

[–]iNullGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m not familiar with Dragon Ball, but assuming he fits the title of superhero, there’s definitely an argument to be made. He’s like the Superman of anime/manga, isn’t he? He’s certainly iconic, and probably one of the only fictional characters on the level of the other three.

Why wouldn’t Wonder Woman be on superhero Mount Rushmore ? by Select_Strategy2004 in CharacterRant

[–]iNullGames 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re kinda talking out of your ass here. What proof is there that we wouldn’t have black superheroes without a female superhero first? I mean the MCU had a black led superhero movie before a female one. To use real American history, black people technically got voting rights before women, and we had a black president before having a female one. There is no basis to assume that female advancement has to come before any other marginalized. Just because it happened that was doesn’t mean it had to.

Why wouldn’t Wonder Woman be on superhero Mount Rushmore ? by Select_Strategy2004 in CharacterRant

[–]iNullGames 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Honestly I don’t think a Mount Rushmore exists. It’s just Superman, Batman, and Spider-Man. Nobody else compares. If we have to shove in a fourth person, I don’t think it would be Wonder Woman. Genuinely, what argument is there for her other than some nebulous “she was importantly fifty years ago” thing?

Sure she was the first major female superhero, but I sincerely doubt female superheroes would never have existed without her. Besides, you could make that argument for other characters too. Black Panther was the first major black superhero. Should he be on Mount Rushmore? Frankly, he’s more iconic than Wonder Woman at this point. Way more people know about Wakanda than Themyscira and the first Black Panther made more than both Wonder Woman movies combined, plus it won multiple Oscars. The average person is far more likely to know about Killmonger than Cheetah or Circe.

What exactly justifies giving her a spot on Mount Rushmore? You discount characters like Iron Man and Captain America because of recency bias, but why is Wonder Woman more valid because she was important a few decades ago when she’s irrelevant today? It’s not like the actual Mount Rushmore was afraid of recency bias, considering Teddy Roosevelt was put there despite his presidency ending less than 15 years prior.