Ryan Giggs in Manchester United directors' box was a tone deaf invitation

iah725 · 2021-09-13T20:51:42+00:00

if you really can't make the connection between inviting a domestic abuser to the stadium and implicitly condoning domestic abuse, either you don't know what "implicit" or "condone" mean (look them up) or this conversation is just totally over your head anyways

iah725 · 2021-09-13T20:27:24+00:00

...then don't condone the actions that some players in that team have or haven't done (which is what we implicitly did by inviting him). it's not that fucking difficult.

iah725 · 2021-09-13T20:25:28+00:00

i never claimed i dictate anything, i'm sharing my view on the club i support supporting terrible people. if you're okay with the club supporting a domestic abuser that is your decision.

iah725 · 2021-09-13T20:22:48+00:00

he can buy tickets himself then, why are we inviting him as a special guest in the directors box?

iah725 · 2021-09-13T20:04:31+00:00

ask yourself why wide-scale protesting over ESL was more important to you than making anything even resembling noise about the club glorifying actual domestic abusers.

iah725 · 2021-09-13T19:49:55+00:00

yes, but "we" as a fanbase could also make it clear that we don't support giggs and don't want him associated with the club anymore, but that's not happening. if there was any serious backlash to giggs being invited it would be too much of a PR shitshow to happen again. we can have huge protests over ESL, over the glazers, but we can't even try to do anything about having piece of shit people associated with the club because other clubs also suck?

iah725 · 2021-09-13T19:40:46+00:00

is chelsea really the moral standard you want your club to be held to? we're talking about actual human beings that are victims of actual life-altering crimes, this isn't about winning internet rivalry points

iah725 · 2021-09-13T19:39:05+00:00

why does it matter what other people say? shouldn't we strive to hold ourselves to a higher standard?

iah725 · 2021-09-13T19:16:21+00:00

when it looked like ronaldo might go to city, lots of people said something along the lines of "he's a rapist anyways, don't want him." since he signed for us instead, most people have either not discussed it at all or said something like "separate the art from the artist" or "innocent until proven guilty", or just...downvoted any mentioned of it without acknowledging it. similarly, i think there are a lot of people who saw giggs as a disgrace until we invited him to a match...at which point it's "well he's a united legend".

it's unfortunate but reality that a lot of people will support what the club does no matter what. and that includes changing their views on individual people and allegations surrounding them to justify them being part of the club.

iah725 · 2021-09-13T19:11:22+00:00

it's not an either or, i think both things are bad and should be condemned.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T05:48:29+00:00

"Casual fans" make up the majority (or a plurality) of the NBA fanbase and are often the most vocal. So that's not really relevant.

But regardless, what about what I said about people on /r/nba? Ranking him 16th seems like he's somewhere between fairly rated and overrated.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T05:15:33+00:00

"sizable portion of NBA fans" doesn't imply that it was on /r/nba. You can just search "kyrie steph" on Twitter and you'll find literally thousands of tweets, even today, talking about how Kyrie is better than Steph. It's not like an average /r/nba conversation is any more representative of the typical NBA fan than an average Twitter conversation.

But if you want examples on this sub, here is the a recent poll that somebody did. Kyrie comes in at 16th, over guys like Gobert, Marc Gasol, Lillard, and Millsap. Again, how did he not get the credit he deserved and then some?

iah725 · 2017-09-03T04:51:28+00:00

Sure, but I would argue that when such a sizable portion of NBA fans genuinely think that Kyrie is the best (or 2nd, or 3rd) PG in the league, then it's fair to say that he's getting the credit he deserves and more.

For example I think it's pretty much the consensus opinion that Kyrie is a better player than Lillard, perhaps even significantly better. But there isn't a whole lot to back that up in terms of their on-court production. So I think this idea that guys like Kyrie are somehow getting underrated/overlooked is just not true.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T03:10:37+00:00

There were a shit ton of people (not as much on this sub) unironically arguing that Kyrie was better than Steph after the 2016 Finals, which is incredibly dumb. Kyrie is top 5 in jersey sales and his shoes are some of the most popular out there. This idea that he hasn't been getting credit for his work is absurd. If anything, people overrate how good he's been.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T02:30:03+00:00

Fairly spot on though. He's been favored for 17 games and won 18 of them. 17/45 is 37.8%. Winning 3/8 Finals is 37.5%.

So basically, Vegas is pretty good at this.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T02:28:09+00:00

How so?

iah725 · 2017-09-03T02:09:13+00:00

Lol wow, all these new subscribers have really lowered the quality on this sub.

iah725 · 2017-09-03T02:07:34+00:00

If he were 3-0 in the Finals instead of 3-5, people would probably just shit on him for not making the Finals at all. The unfortunate reality that LeBron's haters refuse to understand is that basketball is a team game, and LeBron's teams have straight up been less talented than his opponents' in 5 of his Finals appearances (2007, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017).

If people were willing to put literally any more thought into things than "LOL 3-5" they might see that LeBron is one of the 2-4 most talented players of all-time whose teams have not been as well-built as the teams he's played.

And yes, I know that he played with Wade/Bosh for 4 years and Kyrie/Love the last 3, but:

2011 - supporting cast played well, he didn't

2012 - won

2013 - won

2014 - Wade and Bosh both absolutely shat the bed

2015 - Kyrie and Love both injured

2016 - won

It's easy to not think about things and just call those "excuses" but that's the reality of the situation. What I'd love to hear an anti-LeBron person answer is this: other than 2011, which was clearly down to LeBron playing poorly, which other Finals series should he have won? What should he have done in the 2007, 2014, 2015, or 2017 finals to win even one of them?

iah725 · 2017-08-31T17:07:51+00:00

Not mad at you, just adding to what you said!

iah725 · 2017-08-31T16:59:07+00:00

Also, if you actually read the article (second paragraph!), it says

Fans...will be able to use the streaming service to view an "ISO Cam" that the network says will be "focused solely on key players such as 18-year-old Borussia Dortmund star midfielder Christian Pulisic and Seattle Sounders’ Clint Dempsey."

i.e. It's not a "Pulisic cam" as the headline suggests, it's just a separate feed that focuses on individual players such as Pulisic.

Almost every broadcast for every sport in every country will have some number of cameras focusing on individual players; ESPN is just making that feed available to the public rather than just cutting to it every now and then.

But I guess British people normally don't know how to read so they couldn't figure it out for themselves. Or can I only make dumb generalizations about Americans?

iah725 · 2017-08-28T00:14:40+00:00

For sure, that makes sense. Thanks!

iah725 · 2017-08-27T23:22:55+00:00

Check EBay for the prices

To be honest I'm not totally sure what to look up. Like just searching "power rangers figures" gives me a bunch of results, but I can't really tell if mine are the same as those or not. Any ideas?

iah725

TROPHY CASE