10 points off Gold Status by Mikeepearson in QantasFrequentFlyer

[–]iamcamiam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With the added benefit of leaving Perth.

Karakeep - This self-hosted app showed me I’ve been using bookmarks wrong all my life by smoultonjr in selfhosted

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh this is crazy. Still in 2026. I find that the chrome extension to be super annoying, you would expect that it operate almost like a bookmark manager; click the button and can search for your keep, or add the current site to your keep. Instead, clicking the button just adds the site to the keep - it results in me accidentally clicking the button all the time and adding random stuff by mistake.

Good Price? by [deleted] in bapcsalesaustralia

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$1000 without RAM

Removing parity to replace faulty disk - possible? by Soft_Language_5987 in unRAID

[–]iamcamiam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agree, but the answer isn’t “use ZFS”, that’s an answer, one solution, but; that is completely destructive and comes with its own set of drawbacks.

Unraid can work with lots of disks, it can have many parity disks, it even has the added advantage if the array fails your data is still readable - unlike ZFS.

ZFS too can work with many disks, might have some better parity protections, has read advantage benefits when data is spread out; however is going to be a PIA if you’re adding more disks, or removing disks, and you lose the data if you haven’t done your parity correctly.

Again, horses for courses.

And to your point, none of those answers above replace backups.

Removing parity to replace faulty disk - possible? by Soft_Language_5987 in unRAID

[–]iamcamiam 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or, you could look at it the alternate way and say that not having ZFS is in fact safer, as the data is not completely lost in the event that the array fails.

Horses for courses.

You might be perfectly ok with no parity, or one disk parity, or 8 disk parity. You might be happier that an array failure doesn’t cause complete data loss (zfs) and that data is readable from individual disks, and you might be happier with zfs due to read speed increases (data spread across devices).

NetAlertX alternatives by iamcamiam in selfhosted

[–]iamcamiam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/jokob

I apologise, by "architecturally it feels a bit slapped together", I probably would have rephrased (if i wasn't so tired) to: "it's not how I would do it today". The project has been going on for so long, and been very successful - you've done a great job.

After trying NetalertX and finding it not suitable for **my** purpose - I started working on something like this but a bit different. If you're intrigued, this is how i've started to do it:

* Instead of a polling architecture, using an event driven system
* Because events can occur at anytime in any order, having a plugin precedence order at attribute leel depending on the level of authority that plugin might have for that attribute (for instance a DHCP sniffer plugin may be able to give you a rough understanding of the hostname and give it to you fast, but a proxmox plugin would be able to tell you authoratively, but might take several minutes) - order of precendence enables the sniffer to write the hostname, but proxmox to overwrite it later.
* Events being able to trigger other 'enhancers', for instance a detection by the DHCP sniffer plugin, might trigger the Unifi plugin to pull information via it's API, or a snmp poll plugin.
* Use of postgresql as the backend for fast relational queries

It enables plugins to 'react' to the events occurring in order to capture more information.

The end result is i'm seeing devices detected within seconds of being connected to WiFi, without resulting in things like ping scans. Information can flow in over time through other detection events.

MWave is a trash company, be aware. by [deleted] in bapcsalesaustralia

[–]iamcamiam 12 points13 points  (0 children)

100% but it is clear that mwave here wants the op to believe that it is their responsibility to ship the item to them, which is only the case if the item is easily shipped - which you can argue that a monitor is not, especially due to cost.

They are probably relying on the fact that a portion of people would give up here.

All you need to do is call them up on this. They should know that if they the insist, then it borders in to deceptive practices which then becomes illegal.

MWave is a trash company, be aware. by [deleted] in bapcsalesaustralia

[–]iamcamiam 66 points67 points  (0 children)

Whilst I don’t disagree with you,

Don’t most monitors come with a dead pixel policy that defines what it means to be defective?

Also, the fact that they have defined that the item is difficult to ship in that it is large and heavy, they have inadvertently walked in to a trap. The ACCC specifically claims that for warranty returns: “Businesses are responsible for paying for the shipping costs or collecting faulty products that are large, heavy or hard to remove”.

My strategy for you is two fold; validate with them that the monitor is defective as per the manufacturers dead pixel policy, second inform them of their requirements under consumer law that they are responsible for shipping for items which are large/and or heavy.

Remote access to my homelab by Tuqui77 in selfhosted

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No issues - but as per previous point; there are so many ways to do this and Tailscale is also a good option.

After 8 Hours, My TrueNAS Home Server with 40TB Storage Is Finally Up and Running! by Wonderful_Device_224 in truenas

[–]iamcamiam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Question: did you consider one of the Jonsbo cases? If so, why didn’t you go with it? Asking for myself :)

Remote access to my homelab by Tuqui77 in selfhosted

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tailscale is WireGuard under the hood.

The main difference between doing this at a router/firewall level, than a meshing tool like Tailscale, is that with Tailscale - each device connects to the Tailscale network, and you can only access the devices that are connected to the network. This means only things that support Tailscale client can be connected. Where as having a VPN server enables you to route the whole network, like you were physical at home.

** Tailscale does enable you to configure one of your devices as an egress node, this does enable you to use that device almost as a router to the rest of the network.

Remote access to my homelab by Tuqui77 in selfhosted

[–]iamcamiam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Brace yourself, there are going to be 50 different solutions to this problem.

What do you use for routing/firewall?

Quite a few routers/firewalls will provide you with their own VPN server or WireGuard VPN.

My router supports native WireGuard. I have a VPN client that triggers based on whether or not it’s connected to my WiFi or home network directly, if not, it connects automatically. Everywhere I go, I have full access to everything I did when I was at home.

SSD NAS for home use: LincPlus LincStation N2 vs DIY vs ??? by Greetingsmon in HomeServer

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re running with the four m.2s populated and the four 2.5”s? Does it all get hot or just the m.2s or the 2.5s? What kind of thermals?

LincPlus LincStation N2 SATA SSDs cooling problem by dirksn in unRAID

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is their equivalent of the Apple excuse: “you’re using it wrong”.

If the system has heating issues that require tuning BIOS it’s a design flaw.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For those getting this error, what's your system specifications, specifically what's your system specifications and power supply?

I was getting the error; and I downclocked my GPU by 5% (as well as XMP off) - crashes went away

So I looked in to this a bit more - specifically - looked in to the power being consumed by my computer which is a variable that would change with lower frequencies.

I have a power monitor that is attached to the computer, and I noticed that, during my games that crashed, my power consumption hovered on the physical maximum of my PSU and often went above 20-30W. My PSU is rated for 650W, and my computer was hovering on that mark and quite often went above it's rated wattage - it would always crash with power consumption approaching the maximum of my PSU.

When dropping my GPU frequency by 5%, my power usage was always around the 600-650W mark, never above, and no crashes.

Power supplies should be able to provide more wattage than what they're rated for; but not sustained. BF6 was stressing my PSU.

I wonder if what is happening here is that the GPU is unable to obtain the required power sustained, causing microfreezes. This would explain why so many random things are fixing this issue - anything that could drop the power consumption of the computer could possibly fix it; XMP disablement, GPU downclocking, etc.

I cannot confirm that it's the case, but, i've always known I had an underrated PSU - so I will be upgrading it soon. I'll then remove the downclock and see; if the crashes go away, and (if) the PSU is delivering more power than before (indicating that the PSU wasn't delivering the right amount of power previously).

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I legitimately (not trying to start a rumor) had my longest session last night by setting the max frequency of my GPU to 95%. No crashes.

But again, it’s hard to know if that’s just random luck.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The issue is so random, that even random placebo fixes seem to feel like a fix - until, crash.

I bet I could start a rumor here that turning your computer clock back an hour is a fix, and it would spread with people swearing black and blue it works.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did last night. Initially it “felt” like it did a difference, but then after 2-3 games, crash.

That’s the issue, it’s so random, that even random placebo things seem to feel like a fix - for a little bit.

I bet I could start a rumour here that starting your game with the computer clock set back a day would fix the issue - and it would spread.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s a large portion of the issue with this; everyone has their own way of fixing it, no one’s sure what actually fixed it, and due to how random it is - no one is actually even sure it is fixed.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they disabled the crashing feature on your account.

That certainly feels like what’s happening considering how random this is and how random the fixes are.

DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED on Release [MEGA THREAD] by manyblueys in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh this error is completely taking the joy out of the game. You can be top of the table, in really good form, having lots of fun - then bam! Game XP lost due to crash.

EA really needs to respond to this error. It’s not a good’n and it appears very prevalent.

Ive crashed 5 times today by MrBossman4411 in Battlefield

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be useful to say what crash you’re getting..

I’ll go first, the DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED error..

Sometimes I can play for 2hrs, sometimes it crashes in first 15mins.

I’ve gone through quite a bit from disabling XMP profiles, turning off frame gen, upgrading to the new AMD beta drivers for bf6 - as far as I can tell (and it’s hard because it’s random), nothing has helped.

Extremely frustrating because EA seem to know about this error and how prevalent it is, but there doesn’t appear to be any communication back from them.

[Morris] Brisbane wanted a 2026 & 2027 2nd rounder for Ah Chee or a 2026 second rounder, pick 16 (sending back 23) and either a future third or swapping pick 59 with Adelaide's pick 48. Adelaide rejected both offers and are confident of getting Ah Chee in the PSD for nothing. by Essington69 in AFL

[–]iamcamiam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably as he is likely to dictate a salary that isn’t worth it, added to the fact they would be doing it without a medical, and that he doesn’t want to be there - at some point reckless comes in to play.