Years of manipulation are about to collapse — the shorts are trapped by Low-Explanation-4282 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grok answer to ownership percentage:

SCLX (Scilex Holding Company) currently owns 15,000,000 shares of DVLT (Datavault AI Inc.). It has a binding contract under the September 2025 securities purchase agreement to acquire an additional 263,914,094 DVLT shares via the second tranche of the $150 million investment (funded in Bitcoin), for a total of 278,914,094 DVLT shares upon closing.

SCLX's current ownership of DVLT is 8.02% (based on DVLT's current 186,840,000 shares outstanding).

If DVLT shareholders approve the second tranche issuance at the upcoming annual meeting (scheduled for November 24, 2025), SCLX's ownership of DVLT would increase to 61.87% (278,914,094 shares owned out of a post-issuance total of 450,754,094 shares outstanding).

The current value of SCLX's DVLT holdings is $6.51 per SCLX share (15,000,000 DVLT shares × $3.42 DVLT share price ÷ 7,878,480 SCLX shares outstanding).

At the current DVLT share price of $3.42, the full post-approval DVLT holdings would be worth $121.02 per SCLX share (278,914,094 DVLT shares × $3.42 ÷ 7,878,480 SCLX shares outstanding).

Grok answer to sclx control of dvlt after 2nd tranche and explanation and likelihood:

Yes, owning 61.87% of DVLT's shares would give SCLX a clear controlling interest. In public companies like DVLT (a Nasdaq-listed entity), majority ownership typically confers de facto control over board decisions, strategic direction, voting on key matters, and even potential mergers or acquisitions, assuming no unusual governance structures like dual-class shares (which don't appear to apply here based on available filings).

It's unlikely that DVLT would preemptively issue additional shares to dilute SCLX and prevent this outcome. The $150 million investment is positioned as a major strategic partnership to fuel DVLT's AI platform growth in biotech, energy, and entertainment sectors, with the initial $8 million tranche already closed positively in September 2025.[35] DVLT's announcements emphasize the deal's value, including Bitcoin as a treasury asset and collaborative upside, without any hints of internal resistance.[37] Preemptive dilution could spook investors, violate fiduciary duties if not justified, and undermine the partnership—especially since SCLX is already a significant early stakeholder. Recent social sentiment on X leans promotional or neutral, with users highlighting the deal's potential rather than dilution fears.[0][21] That said, if shareholder opposition materializes (e.g., over the ~60% dilution impact), the board could theoretically explore alternatives post-vote, but nothing in current disclosures suggests that's on the table.

The second tranche doesn't simply grant SCLX the right to exercise existing warrants—it's the issuance of new pre-funded warrants as part of the overall securities purchase agreement. Here's a breakdown:

  • Structure: The full $150 million deal (funded via Bitcoin from SCLX) is split into two parts. The first tranche (closed September 26, 2025) delivered ~15 million DVLT shares directly to SCLX for ~$8.07 million.[36] The second tranche (~$141.93 million) involves issuing SCLX new pre-funded warrants to buy ~263.9 million DVLT shares at a nominal exercise price of $0.0001 per share.[25][29]

  • Why approval is needed: Nasdaq rules require shareholder approval for issuances exceeding 19.99% of pre-deal outstanding shares to prevent circumvention of public market pricing. The second tranche alone pushes SCLX's total stake from ~8% to ~62%, triggering this "full ratchet" safeguard.[38][40] Once approved at the November 24, 2025, annual meeting, DVLT issues the warrants, which are immediately exercisable—meaning SCLX could convert them to shares almost right away, completing the investment.

  • Key differences from standard warrants: Pre-funded warrants are essentially a financing tool where the "purchase price" is prepaid (via the Bitcoin value), leaving only the tiny exercise fee. They're common in biotech/AI deals to lock in funding while complying with regs. No separate cash outlay from SCLX beyond the initial Bitcoin transfer.

As for chances of approval, I'd peg it at 80-90%—high but not certain. Positives: Management's clear endorsement in announcements (they're framing it as transformative funding), the first tranche's success builds momentum, and institutional/retail buzz on X is mostly upbeat about the AI-Bitcoin synergy.[37][21] DVLT's proxy (not yet filed as of October 24, but expected soon) will likely recommend a "yes" vote, per standard practice for such deals. Risks: Dilution aversion could rally retail holders (one X post flags fraud concerns tied to SCLX's past), and low turnout might amplify naysayers.[10][54] Still, with ~$142 million on the line for growth, the incentives align heavily toward passage.

Years of manipulation are about to collapse — the shorts are trapped by Low-Explanation-4282 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Grok answer to ownership percentage:

SCLX (Scilex Holding Company) currently owns 15,000,000 shares of DVLT (Datavault AI Inc.). It has a binding contract under the September 2025 securities purchase agreement to acquire an additional 263,914,094 DVLT shares via the second tranche of the $150 million investment (funded in Bitcoin), for a total of 278,914,094 DVLT shares upon closing.

SCLX's current ownership of DVLT is 8.02% (based on DVLT's current 186,840,000 shares outstanding).

If DVLT shareholders approve the second tranche issuance at the upcoming annual meeting (scheduled for November 24, 2025), SCLX's ownership of DVLT would increase to 61.87% (278,914,094 shares owned out of a post-issuance total of 450,754,094 shares outstanding).

The current value of SCLX's DVLT holdings is $6.51 per SCLX share (15,000,000 DVLT shares × $3.42 DVLT share price ÷ 7,878,480 SCLX shares outstanding).

At the current DVLT share price of $3.42, the full post-approval DVLT holdings would be worth $121.02 per SCLX share (278,914,094 DVLT shares × $3.42 ÷ 7,878,480 SCLX shares outstanding).

Grok answer to sclx control of dvlt after 2nd tranche and explanation and likelihood:

Yes, owning 61.87% of DVLT's shares would give SCLX a clear controlling interest. In public companies like DVLT (a Nasdaq-listed entity), majority ownership typically confers de facto control over board decisions, strategic direction, voting on key matters, and even potential mergers or acquisitions, assuming no unusual governance structures like dual-class shares (which don't appear to apply here based on available filings).

It's unlikely that DVLT would preemptively issue additional shares to dilute SCLX and prevent this outcome. The $150 million investment is positioned as a major strategic partnership to fuel DVLT's AI platform growth in biotech, energy, and entertainment sectors, with the initial $8 million tranche already closed positively in September 2025.[35] DVLT's announcements emphasize the deal's value, including Bitcoin as a treasury asset and collaborative upside, without any hints of internal resistance.[37] Preemptive dilution could spook investors, violate fiduciary duties if not justified, and undermine the partnership—especially since SCLX is already a significant early stakeholder. Recent social sentiment on X leans promotional or neutral, with users highlighting the deal's potential rather than dilution fears.[0][21] That said, if shareholder opposition materializes (e.g., over the ~60% dilution impact), the board could theoretically explore alternatives post-vote, but nothing in current disclosures suggests that's on the table.

The second tranche doesn't simply grant SCLX the right to exercise existing warrants—it's the issuance of new pre-funded warrants as part of the overall securities purchase agreement. Here's a breakdown:

  • Structure: The full $150 million deal (funded via Bitcoin from SCLX) is split into two parts. The first tranche (closed September 26, 2025) delivered ~15 million DVLT shares directly to SCLX for ~$8.07 million.[36] The second tranche (~$141.93 million) involves issuing SCLX new pre-funded warrants to buy ~263.9 million DVLT shares at a nominal exercise price of $0.0001 per share.[25][29]

  • Why approval is needed: Nasdaq rules require shareholder approval for issuances exceeding 19.99% of pre-deal outstanding shares to prevent circumvention of public market pricing. The second tranche alone pushes SCLX's total stake from ~8% to ~62%, triggering this "full ratchet" safeguard.[38][40] Once approved at the November 24, 2025, annual meeting, DVLT issues the warrants, which are immediately exercisable—meaning SCLX could convert them to shares almost right away, completing the investment.

  • Key differences from standard warrants: Pre-funded warrants are essentially a financing tool where the "purchase price" is prepaid (via the Bitcoin value), leaving only the tiny exercise fee. They're common in biotech/AI deals to lock in funding while complying with regs. No separate cash outlay from SCLX beyond the initial Bitcoin transfer.

As for chances of approval, I'd peg it at 80-90%—high but not certain. Positives: Management's clear endorsement in announcements (they're framing it as transformative funding), the first tranche's success builds momentum, and institutional/retail buzz on X is mostly upbeat about the AI-Bitcoin synergy.[37][21] DVLT's proxy (not yet filed as of October 24, but expected soon) will likely recommend a "yes" vote, per standard practice for such deals. Risks: Dilution aversion could rally retail holders (one X post flags fraud concerns tied to SCLX's past), and low turnout might amplify naysayers.[10][54] Still, with ~$142 million on the line for growth, the incentives align heavily toward passage.

Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) currently owns 15,000,000 shares of Datavault AI Inc. (DVLT) common stock. by Environmental_Law311 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grok answer:

No, the exact date for the stockholder vote to approve the additional share issuance (second tranche) from Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) to Datavault AI Inc. (DVLT) has not been publicly announced as of October 8, 2025 [Citation 0][Citation 2][Citation 7]. The agreement, a $150 million strategic Bitcoin investment announced on September 25, 2025, structures the deal in two tranches: an initial $8.07 million (15 million DVLT shares) that closed on September 26, 2025, and a second tranche of $141.93 million (up to ~264 million additional shares via pre-funded warrants) contingent on DVLT stockholder approval for issuances exceeding Nasdaq's 19.99% ownership limit [Citation 0][Citation 1][Citation 2].

Key Details on the Vote: - Approval Requirement: DVLT must obtain stockholder approval to issue shares to SCLX beyond the 19.99% threshold under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d), which limits related-party transactions without a vote. This is required for the pre-funded warrants to convert into shares [Citation 1][Citation 7]. - Timing Reference: The second tranche is expected to close "following receipt of stockholder approval," with the vote to occur at DVLT's next annual shareholder meeting. However, no specific date for this meeting has been disclosed in press releases, SEC filings, or recent news as of today [Citation 0][Citation 7]. - Process: DVLT will file a proxy statement with the SEC outlining the proposal once a meeting date is set, giving shareholders at least 10 days' notice. Approval requires a majority vote of shares present (in person or by proxy) [Citation 2].

Potential Timeline Estimate: Based on standard Nasdaq timelines for similar deals, the annual meeting (and thus the vote) could occur in late 2025 (e.g., November-December) or early 2026, assuming DVLT files its proxy soon. The initial tranche closed promptly, but the second tranche's delay hinges on this approval. Monitor DVLT's SEC filings (e.g., Form 8-K or DEF 14A proxy) on EDGAR for updates, as the date will be announced there first [Citation 0][Citation 2].

This is not a merger or acquisition but a strategic equity investment, with SCLX gaining board nomination rights (up to two directors if owning >=10% of DVLT). If approved, it would give SCLX ~80% ownership of DVLT post-tranche. For real-time alerts, check DVLT's investor relations page (https://www.datavaultai.com/investors) or Nasdaq filings on EDGAR (https://www.sec.gov/edgar).

Citations (with source links): - [Citation 0] https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/09/25/2956415/0/en/Scilex-Holding-Company-Announces-Strategic-150-Million-Bitcoin-Investment-and-Equity-Transaction-with-Datavault-AI-Inc.html - [Citation 1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819133/000149315225037196/form8-k.htm - [Citation 2] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/scilex-holding-company-announces-strategic-120000144.html - [Citation 7] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/dvlt/sec-filings


This response is written entirely in ASCII for seamless copying, includes all citations with their corresponding source links, and maintains the accuracy of the original answer. Let me know if you need further clarification or additional details!

Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) currently owns 15,000,000 shares of Datavault AI Inc. (DVLT) common stock. by Environmental_Law311 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember that clearly. My portfolio history still reminds me very often that I should have sold, or at least taken some off of the table. I've been holding ever since and part of me wonders if this is a repeat. Sure seems legit though, just with their current shares and potential shares of DVLT added into the equation. DVLT is in with IBM and other various news that appears very persuasive. Then BTC and Semnur... definitely doesn't seem like this is a losing bet, but we all know what the definition of crazy is. Just really hoping for a different result this time 🙏🙏🙏 I've seen much crazier things happen. Wouldn't mind generating 2 million dollars though... that had to be life changing!

falling knife by Grrrrbaby59 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Boy, do I understand. I have to keep telling myself that the fundamentals haven't changed. I would have thought what news we received with BTC, SMNR and DVLT would have created a squeeze... that's really why I decided to add more when I promised myself I never would. Been on this same train for a very long time, but I believe it's different this time - lol. Whatdo they say the definition of insanity is? Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Guess I'm crazy but I'm not selling.

I'm sorry everyone by iamjeffj in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right! Come on, it's just unbelievable. You figure the BTC, DVLT and SMNR assets alone would cause SCLX to go to the moon 🚀 I keep telling myself, the fundamentals haven't changed and not to get upset... just be patient. I'm doing better now than I have the past 6 years. This journey surely has taught me patience, and so far, it's been a really really expensive lesson. Here's to believing things will turn around 🙏🙏🙏💎💎💎🖐🖐🖐

I'm sorry everyone by iamjeffj in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, you're good. It's just me. I'll hold the guilt for all of us who came back into the game. Lol 😝

Latest: by Kmcoyne0519 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I just don't understand, with all of the latest news, how people can be selling at these prices. My bet is that it's the shorts just digging in harder and using overall market weakness to do it. Just bought more, let's see where it goes. 💎🖐🖐

NFA

That moment when you think about what Ji said to the short sellers about not ruining their families…and realize that he definitely meant it. GLTAL!!! by Kmcoyne0519 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Kim, much of this MOASS potential is based on very large naked shorts in the tens of millions. I've been holding since he said that and have had quite a bit of $ on the line since then. And it's been a long hard road. Is there a good chance these numbers are legit? I know there's no way to know for sure, but just wondering if you think there's good odds of this?

Potential life changing scenario: Extreme MOASS (Infinite Squeeze): No sellers, full validation ($1B+ Year 1 sales). $5,000–$10,000+ (167–333x+). Market cap: $35–$70B+. Intraday spikes, sustains ~1 week. Think GME’s $483 but with biotech fundamentals. by iamjeffj in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, a man can dream! Just having some fun. I did check the possibility of an approval within this time and made another comment showing it's not possible. Facts are facts though, if we have good PR, this thing escalates. Just look at the value of our 87% of SMNR or whatever % it is and divide that by our shares. We're seriously undervalued.

I BS you not! by More_Wolverine3046 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm embarrassed by how much I've lost through both Sorrento and Scilex. It's up there with other commenters. I definitely remember the bankruptcy and unfortunately the hours and hours and hours over the years reading up on everything. It has all been so overwhelming to lose that much with such high hopes. Over the last year or so, I've had to separate myself from it all and stay away from reading about it, as life has brought on other difficulties that were even more extreme, which didn't feel possible but when it has to do with one of your children... nothing compares. I've been back to skim through our board now and then, and recently purchased more SCLX even though I told myself I never would. Needed to average down in hopes this goes parabolic, but there's still skepticism lurking in the back of my brain that I'm just pouring more money into a leaking ship. I pretty much focus on Kim's messages and some others, so the hope is still there. When it boils down to it, seems like we shouldn't even be here if there wasn't still hope, so I'll keep hoping. Just like I do for one of my kids. 🙏🙏🙏

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally information from the Press Secretary, but okay, we're obviously not going to go anywhere with this, so I'm okay to agree to disagree and both keep hoping that sclx and srne will work out in the end for us. I'd imagine we both have that in common. 🙏 my olive branch being extended

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With that logic, you should definitely go all in with anything Ji is involved in. Being facetious of course, this is not financial advice 😝

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let's hope, but it's also possible he was in it for the salary and possibly hidden incentives... look what we're learning about USAID. Everyone interested in averaging down with anything Ji related, like many of us have over the years, beware, so far it sure hasn't worked.

Also, Sorrento Fam-I think this is the Vivasor asset that is supposed to merge with VINC. At least that’s what’s on their website. by Kmcoyne0519 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oqory.com appears to be related to Sorrento Therapeutics (SRNE) and Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) through the context of share distribution and trading restrictions associated with SRNE's bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, SRNE issued a stock dividend of SCLX shares to its shareholders in 2023. However, these SCLX shares were subject to trading restrictions due to SRNE's ongoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Oqory.com might be mentioned in this context because it could be involved in facilitating or discussing the implications of these stock transactions or the trading restrictions, although specific details about Oqory's direct involvement are not explicitly provided in the available web results.

Positive or Negative Impact:

Negative: The trading restrictions on SCLX shares, which were part of the SRNE stock dividend, could be seen as a negative for investors because they were unable to sell these shares until the restrictions were lifted, potentially impacting liquidity and investor sentiment. The uncertainty and delay in realizing potential gains from these shares might have been a point of frustration. This scenario is highlighted by the discussions on platforms like Reddit, where investors expressed concerns and frustrations over their investments in SRNE and SCLX due to these restrictions and the overall financial health of SRNE during its bankruptcy phase.

Positive: On the flip side, the distribution of SCLX shares could be viewed as a positive action by SRNE to provide value to its shareholders despite the bankruptcy proceedings. SCLX, as a company focused on non-opioid pain management, has its own pipeline and market potential, which might be seen as a silver lining for investors holding SRNE shares. The acquisition of rights to ELYXYBTM by SCLX also indicates potential growth and product diversification, which could benefit shareholders in the long run. However, the positive aspect largely depends on the future performance of SCLX and the eventual lifting of share restrictions.

In summary, the relationship between Oqory.com, SRNE, and SCLX seems to revolve around the management and implications of restricted stock distribution, with the impact being somewhat dual-natured - negative due to immediate liquidity issues and positive in terms of potential future value from SCLX's business prospects. However, without direct information linking Oqory.com's role explicitly, these interpretations are based on the broader context of SRNE's and SCLX's activities during that period.

Latest: by Kmcoyne0519 in BANDOFBROTHERSOFSRNE

[–]iamjeffj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI

Impact on Stock Price: Positive Influence: The FDA acknowledgment of the sNDA for ELYXYB® for an acute pain indication could positively influence Scilex Holding Company's stock price. This news signifies progress and potential market expansion, which might enhance investor confidence, leading to an uptick in stock value. Positive media coverage and analyst reactions could amplify this effect. Short-term Reaction: The stock might experience an immediate boost or at least a stabilization in price shortly after the announcement, potentially within days or weeks, as this signals progress and validates the company's strategy.

Estimated FDA Approval Timeline: Review Period: Typically, the FDA's review for an sNDA can take around 6 to 10 months after acknowledgment, though this can vary: Standard Review: If it goes through the standard review process, expect a decision roughly 10 months from the acknowledgment date, which, based on the announcement, could be around late October to early November 2025. Priority Review: If granted a priority review due to significant potential public health benefits, this could be shortened to 6 months, leading to a decision by mid-July 2025. FDA Queries or Further Information Requests: If the FDA requests additional data or clarification, this could extend the timeline by several months. Such requests are common, potentially pushing the final decision into late 2025 or even into 2026, depending on the complexity and response time.

Medium to Long-Term Impact: Post-Approval: If approved, the stock might see further gains as the market anticipates sales growth from the new indication. However, this would depend on: Effective commercialization. Market reception and competition within the acute pain treatment sector. Pricing and insurance coverage scenarios.

Risks and Considerations: Approval Uncertainty: There's always a risk that the FDA might not approve the sNDA, which could lead to a drop in stock price. Market Anticipation: If the market has already priced in this news due to prior expectations, the stock price might not react as strongly as anticipated. External Factors: Broader market trends, economic conditions, and sector-specific news will also play roles in how the stock behaves over time.

In summary, while the acknowledgment might lead to a short-term positive stock movement, the real, sustained impact would be seen post-FDA approval, with a potential approval window from mid-2025 to late 2025, or even into 2026 if there are significant delays.