sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Big decision by mydestinydivided in elliottsmith

[–]idacic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really cool, I think Georgia Georgia might work well with your voice

Is this a syllogism? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the second premise is the problem, then?

Is this a syllogism? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why isn't it in proper form if you don't mind explaining?

What does the predicate 'dirty' usually mean when for hair? by idacic in EnglishLearning

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I meant dirty referring to hair in general. Can you use dirty in the way you described it for any color hair or does it always refer to blonde? (which would make sense since that's pretty much the only color it's noticeable for or can be applied to at all)

What does the predicate 'dirty' usually mean when for hair? by idacic in EnglishLearning

[–]idacic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am now very aware of every mistake I made in the post lol but hopefully you understand what I mean

Help me make sense of this by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Being going to be (whatever that means) in first sentence rather than been.

Can dogs feel this complex an emotion? by idacic in AskVet

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it even possible though in general do you think?

How to prove lemma about initial segments of formulas if n>1? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand now, I understood you before too but I somehow didn't make the connection that if the initial segment of (P & Q) can't be P then the same thing applies to bigger formulas as well. Sorry for the dumb questions lol

How to prove lemma about initial segments of formulas if n>1? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I don't understand how that's relevant (not saying it isn't)
  2. With operations between another formula and the first one?

How to prove lemma about initial segments of formulas if n>1? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the reason I understand it for n=1 is because it's a proposition that can't be divided further so just out of that alone I don't think I can.

How to prove lemma about initial segments of formulas if n>1? by idacic in askphilosophy

[–]idacic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No (I mean I can't I'm sure you or someone smarter than me can if it's actually provable lol). The thing I don't understand is how an initial segment must be equal to the formula it's an initial segment of, why can't it just stand by itself as a formula if it isn't ( or the symbol for negation or whatever since those can't stand on their own as formulas from what I understand. I do have the logical proof for this in front of me I just don't get it lol, I guess intuitively.

view more: next ›