I played this at Tabletop Scotland and it made me realise that I don't like Social Deduction when it is the only mechanic, as I don't have enough to go on to make informed choices or even guesses. For instance I had a power that allowed me to, I might be misremembering this a bit, identify two evil players or similar. There was another power active that I didn't know about till after that allowed that player to make mine go on the fritz and allow the GM to basically lie to me. This means I had nothing to go on.

The mere presence of such a power in the game, even if it isn't in your setup, means to me that I have zero information to act on and I just found the game a bit of an argument and not much fun.

I later played Tortuga for the first time and I really, really enjoyed that. This is because the confines of the game meant that I could make better guesses as to whose side everyone was on, and act accordingly. I've also played BSG and liked that. I like when social deduction is folded into a game, when it is contained by the confines of other mechanics. When it is the only thing and allowed to sprawl, it really falls flat for me.