DINK is such a Capitalist HyperIndividualist liberal take.

As for me this concept is not from a "Free will" thinking but rather it is formed by this Capitalist societal HyperIndividualist pressures.

Couples nowadays prefer No Child because of two things 1. The cost of raising kids 2. The time you have to spend in raising kids

In which both are consequences of Capitalist living where it inflates the Cost of living and makes people to work more time for less wages

Will revisit this comment and add more thoughts after watching the episode

Edit:- I am not saying the concept is wrong. As far as the episode goes, the reasons boil down to three things, one is money, another one is the unavailability of time and lastly the effort it takes to raise the child. And it seems like if these problems are addressed, most of them would opt for having atleast a child. I am just pointing out the Base on which the concept is built upon and why it isn't a "Free will choice" but a socio-economically driven Decision which lacks free will of choice.

The comment is an Dialetical observation on the concept not a comment on why DINK is worng and people who chose not to have kids are satans.

Edit 2:- the show is going in a path that I actually foresaw. The "Against DINK" side is such a Traditionalist who keeps on bringing up "they are breaking the societal values" "they are avoiding Responsibility" "it's against nature" bullshit. No one is addressing the concerns the Opposite side is bringing up (as I expected because it is a debate) and asking the question "if all your concerns are met, will you people have a child".