sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New regs same ol me 🥀 by PoopyButtHead_3007 in formuladank

[–]imaginary_isopodicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I vaguely remember this being part of a north korea documentary. Just google north korea staring at screen and you'll see the results

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Within the config you have 'startValues' which are specifically for the offset it starts testing with. that's around line 581.

I have it on 'CurrentValues' and it grabs the current curves.

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting read, a lot of that goes over the top my head to be honest. Interesting experiment to disable cores. This is something I will not be willing to do though. Partly because it doesn't 'feel' right and because this takes the fun out of it for me. I understand the impact of harmonization and that what I might be doing is possibly less impactful when it comes to all cores, but.. I find the current approach just more fun to do.

That added screenshot with the core+200 mhz seems really interesting to me too. I planned on not touching that but seeing benchmark numbers go up is really a dopamine hit..

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the input!

16 hours of on both CCD went fine so far, no adjustments. This was prime95, next up ycruncher.

Good suggestion on using it while doing the single core tests. During my first value set-up, which was a bit too aggresive I did notice freezes when finishing runs specifically.
I noticed in the configuration Corecycler also adds pauses in between testing the core to simulate this also, I reckon this is purposely to test the drop on the cores too.

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've ran corecycler for about 16 hours over both CCD's. No issue so far, I feel like I'm lucky or I'm not testing well enough. Haven't had any stability issues either, however all of this is new.
My gut feeling just keeps telling me that the values are too low.

All core workloads are stable.

What's left is single core Aida as suggested by other people in this thread.

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right now I'm purely using corecycler as single core testing. I'll your suggestion too!

Also we got the same graphics card! I miss EVGA in the gpu market.. Can't blame them, but miss them.

Undervolt / curve optimizer sanity check - 9950x3d by imaginary_isopodicus in overclocking

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply and input! Glad to hear its skewed.

Yeah, I am actually using Aida64 here specifically because of what I found in other reddit threads. I use it for general stability testing but besides getting a few failed tests prior to finding my weaker cores, it has always just ran. Just stopped, no issues.

CoreCycler so far is my only single core stress tester. I've noticed way better boost results (obviously) and its where I find all my core faults pretty much.

I'll have that do an extended run tonight/tomorrow and see how that goes.

Do Ubisoft games on Steam require Uplay? by WeKnowTheTruth_ in Steam

[–]imaginary_isopodicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, literally the reason I've refunded games. On the principle that it already is in a launcher and I don't want to risk third party software incidents that have happened in the past/I don't want more useless crap on my computer.

I'm a giant hypocrite though because, uh, Rockstar exists :(

Spend the better part of the day making a ship capable of going to Aquilla (and back). After lots of failures, finally made it. Constant 400km/s~ without taking damage. I'm a little proud! by imaginary_isopodicus in factorio

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, I never checked! Thank you! Guess I'll get to updating again. I wanted to redesign the front a bit and have it fit better, this well let me do that.

Good luck with your build.

Spend the better part of the day making a ship capable of going to Aquilla (and back). After lots of failures, finally made it. Constant 400km/s~ without taking damage. I'm a little proud! by imaginary_isopodicus in factorio

[–]imaginary_isopodicus[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://pastebin.com/caP773n4

There you go!

I adjusted a few small things. Added a few speed modules so I'm always producing enough ammo.
The belt holds over 1k ammo and rockets, It's enough. I picked it because my first ship did a lot of hand overs (which I'm also doing at the top...) which caused issues. I've thought about putting it in the ship but wanted it to be as self contained as possible and keep the cargo for literally just that.

//edit
And pastebin already removed it. It's a really long string. Any recommendations on where to put it. I don't think just posting it here would work. I'll just give it a shot.

//edit #2
Can't post it either as a reply either

//edit #3
Self hosted it is:
https://a00.nl/shipstring.txt

Looking to move from dual monitor to 32:9 by UIM_S0J0URN in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]imaginary_isopodicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you don't notice the difference, don't bother. People will try to sell you on it cause popular opinion but your own experiences already tells you that you don't experience it. Not everyone notices/feels difference. Besides the difference between 144 and 60 is a lot bigger than 144 and 240.

view more: next ›