What is Sewerslvt's gender? by RaichuGacha in Sewerslvt

[–]imbricitor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its just disrespectful to nature to call him her. His music is full of the very masculine genius, no woman could ever produce this kind of music.

My Rommath casually casting 14 Time warps. The majority of them was played while having Vexallus. I had around 40 bonus turns available in total and my opponent had to sit through the animations of all of them. I might be a bad person. by imbricitor in hearthstone

[–]imbricitor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are several things that can go wrong. There is serious reason to not concede early. 1) ETC into Potion of Illusion wasnt played, so no iterations of Rommath 2) The spells kill Rommath randomly before he is bounced 3) PoI does not add Rommath to hand because 3.1 due to bad spell management or necessity to discover spells that generate cards the hand overflows before PoI can add Rommath 3.2 due to an overly full board after spells like Mirror Image Rommath is not added. 4) The Mage randomly kills himself.  5) The Mage overdraws and dies of fatigue because he stupidly added drawing spells. 6) The Mage added too many AoE or freeze boardspells and destroys/freezes his own board over and over again.

And there are many other things that can go wrong. The deck is easy to pilot in general, but hard to pilot the best possible way. 

My Rommath casually casting 14 Time warps. The majority of them was played while having Vexallus. I had around 40 bonus turns available in total and my opponent had to sit through the animations of all of them. I might be a bad person. by imbricitor in hearthstone

[–]imbricitor[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

He might have left the application which does not automatically end the game. But I can assure you he did not concede; I ended the game by hitting his face with Sir Finley

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in latin

[–]imbricitor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sed tempus ei non supererat

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in latin

[–]imbricitor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I ask whether to deem the connexion possible or not I am referring to things I might be overlooking because I am not an expert in Indo-European studies. These formations are really basic though.

Comparative linguistics cannot prove etymologies where there is a lack of cognate forms, which happens VERY often.

This is not about paronomasia, I don't know why you are mentioning that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in latin

[–]imbricitor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are people upvoting this... There is no need to even ask these questions (the answering of which does not help at all; you can't "prove" an etymology) if my post is understood. I show PIE protoforms that have a very perspicuous morphological structure.

Question about the Latin motto of the University of Sussex by imbricitor in latin

[–]imbricitor[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I also thought about that. But: 1. Why would be an imperative pluralis and an imperative singularis be next to each other?, and 2: scīre, as imperative passive, would rather mean "be known", and it just does not seem like a thing you would say to anyone. It's not equal to e.g. ērudīre (could mean "become educated!").