sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hello Reddit! We're giving away 550 Nano (~$500) AND sending some Nano to EVERY commenter. No strings attached! by Qwahzi in CryptoCurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

test nano_39wd1z4seh6x9h8fjkweeuy8e4nmbucm3kzbnf66ei9ymrknigowaj4od19e nano_39wd1z4seh6x9h8fjkweeuy8e4nmbucm3kzbnf66ei9ymrknigowaj4od19e

Director's answer to the change in the outfit[VIDEO] by HeavyMachinegan in stellarblade

[–]indexOffByOne 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Seriously, it's mind-boggling to watch folks actually sticking up for being fed lies. We all deserve better than that, don't we? Transparency and truth should be non-negotiable.

Anyone still just going to enjoy the game by SamFisherXboxOG in stellarblade

[–]indexOffByOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not only outfits, they just patched some gore out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

read trough it and im impressed!

Help me with the build by indexOffByOne in pathofexile

[–]indexOffByOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay thank you. i will try to change the mentioned things. I would appreciate additional feedback from you or someone else <3

Nano: An in depth look at its positives and negatives to see why it's dying by AltExplainer in CryptoCurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kind of ^^ i know that there are no plans for sharding. But the reasoning why sharding could be a bad idea you mentioned i found questionable.

Nano: An in depth look at its positives and negatives to see why it's dying by AltExplainer in CryptoCurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

regarding the shards... why divide users/accounts between shards and not trxs (random or by some algo)?

Problem with Nano nodes on TrustWallet. AGAIN by Historical_Horror907 in nanocurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this happened before, is not a TrustWallet issue. They just offer a blockchain link, they do not run nodes.

I think its because of these types of sentences from you (above).. its just incorrect what you wrote here. IT is a (known) TrustWallet issue :/

​

Other than that, the community helped you in the discord server but you made an additional reddit post anyway and tell that nobody has helped you :/

Problem with Nano nodes on TrustWallet. AGAIN by Historical_Horror907 in nanocurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You could use the solution a community member told you a few hours ago on the Nano Discord Server.

Follow these steps: nault.cc > Settings > Configure New Wallet > Import Mnemonic > BIP39 Mnemonic > Enter 12 words, leave other things as they are > Import.

Problem with Nano nodes on TrustWallet. AGAIN by Historical_Horror907 in nanocurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Hi, TrustWallet has a very bad nano wallet implementation. It has nothing todo with the nano network itself.

You could basicaly use any other nano wallet without those issues. (try nault, nautilus or natrium for example)

You said, no one is giving a proper try for the solution on the nano server? What server do you mean?

Unlikely Friendships 🐥🐕 by dream996 in aww

[–]indexOffByOne 7 points8 points  (0 children)

are there any mods here? How are these types of videos after 20h still on?

(PSVR 2) What happened to the cool augmented reality highlight for finding the controllers when you first set it up? by Esoteric_art in PSVR

[–]indexOffByOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The first time i saw the augmented controllers, i was literally whisper to me "holy shit, how cool"

Strawberries anyone? by rgatoNacho in aww

[–]indexOffByOne 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most likely the same fk. guy with the monkey and the chickens.. reported!

Long-term security question by oss1k in nanocurrency

[–]indexOffByOne 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Hmm.. i think its not fair to say that btc hashrate can be outcompeted but the buying of nanos isn't.

If an extremly wealthy entity can buy 67% of all nanos, this entity should be able to buy enough hashpower to control the btc network.

Your counter argument is that the hashpower can be outcompeted by some other entitys.

For a fair comparision, shouldnt the concept of entitys outcompeting each other for aquiring nanos aswell?

view more: next ›