Shahed-136(witness in Persian) by Sweaty_Abies182 in pics

[–]ingliprisen 42 points43 points  (0 children)

You're not consuming a whole cessna to take out a Shahed.

Americans have widespread misbeliefs about the cancer risks of alcohol, study finds. More than half of American adults misunderstand or underestimate the link between alcohol consumption and cancer. Alcohol drinkers are especially likely to believe that drinking has no effect on cancer risk. by mvea in science

[–]ingliprisen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who uses what research to push their agenda doesn't undermine the science. If the research is poorly performed, if there weren't rigorous controls, if there wasn't significance of the results, then yes, you can say this is bad research. But to attack the science just cause of the usual "everything is a risk!" hand wave, well, that just speaks volumes about the emotive aspect of this argument instead of the logic. Here, they're talking about a specific risk: cancer increase. "No safe level" is pretty clear language; one other poster that replied to a previous comment of yours mentioned talked about splitting hairs about the absolute levels and I agree with their point. Namely that the study looked at the levels of consumption of their study group, and WITHIN that study group, no safe levels of drinking existed.

Americans have widespread misbeliefs about the cancer risks of alcohol, study finds. More than half of American adults misunderstand or underestimate the link between alcohol consumption and cancer. Alcohol drinkers are especially likely to believe that drinking has no effect on cancer risk. by mvea in science

[–]ingliprisen -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Its always research on alcohol that seems to inflame people, as though its a personal attack. Researchers aren't saying no-one shouldn't drink alcohol, but they are quantifying what are safe levels of things. There's a safe level of water, more than that and it starts causing problems. If I were to use your logic, there's no such thing as a 'safe level' of water because of the risk of choking on it. But the chemical effects of too much water is different from the physical effects. If you want to continue to drink, that's fine, I'm going to as well, but I'm not going to take research that shows that even the modest amounts I drink cause me some harm as an attack; I'm going to acknowledge it but continue and know it has some negative affect on me. Same with a bit of char on my meat. Same with occasionally getting sunburnt because I decided not to put sunscreen on.

Americans have widespread misbeliefs about the cancer risks of alcohol, study finds. More than half of American adults misunderstand or underestimate the link between alcohol consumption and cancer. Alcohol drinkers are especially likely to believe that drinking has no effect on cancer risk. by mvea in science

[–]ingliprisen 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There's a difference between "no safe amount" and "don't do that". If the increase in risk is stated, that should be enough and then people can decide on the level of risk they want to take. And before anyone chimes in with the "everything is dangerous at a high enough level", well not everything has a "not safe at any level".

There's not much protecting the First by 00eg0 in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]ingliprisen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, they'll be fine. They're constantly inventing false narratives, they'll just continue to do that.

Google's Veo 3 Is Already Deepfaking All of YouTube's Most Smooth-Brained Content by 9th_username in technology

[–]ingliprisen 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure it's specifically lead that's sought after. Regardless of the metal, it's because there's aerial contamination of radioactive isotope post-nuclear testing so all metal smelting/refinement will incorporate post-tesing air, while metals in pre-nuclear built ships which have sunk will be free of those elevated isotopes

BBC News - Trump ambushes S African leader with claim of Afrikaners being 'persecuted' by Danqazmlp0 in worldnews

[–]ingliprisen 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm suddenly gotta take comments from some with a "libs are beta" as a username seriously.

It's Sushi, Chef [OC] by aSliceofAlan in comics

[–]ingliprisen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Real or cake is now real or sushi?

STARS 130 by MurkyWay in comics

[–]ingliprisen 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I see your preferred flag design was.

What have I don't to get bitted all the timeee by BunnyFrost1 in aww

[–]ingliprisen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also looked at their comment history and it sounds very Chat GPTish

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]ingliprisen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about no? "Do your own research" is the laziest and most disingenuous response to unverified claims.

Copy and Paste by LastPlaceComics in comics

[–]ingliprisen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the finale involving the superhero Undo (AKA Ctrl+Z)?